What Does The Label Has Changed Over The Past Decades?

The second question asks, “What are the communication ethics of labeling a product as made in a country (typically for marketing reasons) when it is only minimally true? Do you think that companies should have to disclose all of the locations where their products are made? Why or why not?” Unfortunately, laws for this situation are often ambiguous and vague; so companies are able to find ways around them, even more so when products cross into different countries that have entirely different laws and make it even easier for companies to be misleading through advertising. Ethically speaking, it makes more sense a company to be honest with potential customers, it builds trust creates and builds a better brand reputation. I believe companies should be obligated to be completely honest and clear about the materials and locations of which their products are made. This may potentially harm a company because it becomes easier for classified information to be leaked to the public, but this does not rationalize the idea of creating lies through advertising.

As early as the 1970s Mattel was manufacturing products in China in order to take advantage of lower costs and enable corporate resources to focus on establishing the brand. By 2007, nearly 65% of Mattel products were produced in China. Mattel used a combination of company-run plants and a network of contract manufacturers. Exhibit C displays a simplified example of Mattel’s supply chain after moving production to China. Global production obviously had major benefits for Mattel, the country factors of China gave it a comparative cost advantage over producing in the U.S., and outsourcing enabled Mattel to remain profitable in an increasingly competitive toy industry. However, outsourcing does have disadvantages, a global supply chain increases the challenges to regulate and enforce quality.

Klein, in “The Discarded Factory,” provides many examples to show that corporations are much less concerned about production and much more about their brand name. The statement he uses to help explain the reason behind why they are doing this is, "The difference between products and brands is fundamental. A product is something that is made in a factory; a brand is something that is bought by a customer,” (Peter Schweitzer). Many companies believe that while their products and factories are temporary and require upkeep, respectively, their brand will live on for much longer. Because of this, they shift towards outsourcing their production to keep costs as low as possible. The companies then use this extra money to help build their brand using sponsorships and marketing campaigns. In addition to sponsorships and marketing campaigns, companies will also improve their packaging, distribution, and retail channels, and they will expand. A quote once said by Nike’s

The 21st century has seen several companies cross international borders to look for new markets to conduct their business and increase shareholders’ return. The process was fuelled by opening of borders and advancement in transport mode and technology in the 21st century. The situation has complicated the attempts to fully understand the process of global production. However, the research and different literatures in the recent past have given customers and scholar a good read on forms of labour which go into producing the product or service, and how this work is globally distributed (Coe, Dicken and Hess 2008, p.274). The development has made customers to strongly know what they want and what they consume. Therefore, this essay will analyze the Global Production Network (GPN) of coffee and discuss who benefits most from the structure of this GPN. In the analysis, the essay will focus on three different aspects. First, the paper will analyze various forms of labour that go into creating the product and how is this work globally distributed. The essay will also analyze how the value is captured at each stage of production distributed along the network. Lastly, the essay will focus on the institutional arrangements that explain the structure of this GPN.

Many businesses in United States manufacture their product overseas. This involves manufacturing products outside United States where the labor cost is cheaper. Because of cheap labor, it is often more economical for a U.S. company to manufacture overseas and pay the shipping costs than to manufacture in the United States. For a company, the savings may be substantial. However, there are negative impacts on U.S. employment, as many jobs in the United States are being outsourced and replaced by overseas positions. The manufacturers outsource production projects to save time, money or resources. The manufacturing is outsourced so as to remain competitive and maintain a steady work flow. Without outsourcing, manufacturing costs could escalate to the point at which no product would sell and all employees would have no work. Outsourcing comes

“Global sourcing is defined as sourcing the technology, materials and components from sites and supplies located throughout the world. It also means the integration and coordination of requirements across worldwide business units” (Monczka & Trent, 1991, pp2-7).

Have you ever thought about those little words in fine print that tell you where a product was made? How about the last time you put tires on your car? Before you made a decision on the purchase did you stop and ask where the tires are made? Probably not! You heard the only words you wanted to hear....good and cheap! When did we stop caring about where a product is made or did we ever? Why would this matter anyway and what importance is of it? Some may argue that free trade and imports give us purchasing power. They believe cheaper goods results in more money in our pocket to buy other goods. That theory is a farce with little to no data to support it. Buying American made supports job growth, the environment and human rights.

Richard, many of the products that we use on modern day America were made in the third world by poorly paid workers. These are countries like India and China that care very little about human rights and value economic prosperity over the wellbeing of their workers. I would argue that almost all of the products we use are made

You walk into a store pick up items  and read its tag wait what does it say the three words any american hopefully hates to see "made in China." It might say "made in mexico" But it probably won't ever say "made in USA." It use to never be this way decades ago. You ask why do you even care it means cheaper product's. Well i do care because your taking business away from american companies because your to cheap to spend the extra money to get an actually well manufactured product.

New guidelines have eliminated this practice. However, companies choose to label products ‘Made in Canada from Domestic and Imported Ingredients’ instead of labelling all the country origins of their ingredients. An example is in the meat industry. Foreign animals imported into Canada but slaughtered and/or processed here still qualify for ‘Made in Canada’ labels, in fact, only pre-processed and packaged imported meat requires a country of origin label (Weeks).

Many companies who still do manufacture in America still do so by purchasing parts from China. It is cheaper to buy the part and have it shipped to America in order to then be assembled.

The supply and manufacture of many critical components is performed by sole-sourced third-party vendors in the U.S., China, Germany, Ireland, Israel, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, the Netherlands, the

According to the reading, it is true that “When digital camera and camcorder first appeared on the market in the early 1900s, Sony only had a few competitors such as Canon and Olympus”(49). Thus, it cannot be denied that Sony can gained a competitve advantage by reducing price, thus Sony placed its production in China in order to reduce the product’s assembly and manufacturing. However, when more competitors came, this strategices cannot work very well under this new circumstance, because for high value-added products like digital camera and camcorder, company cannot just focus on the manufacturing cost and minizing cycle time is also attached great importance. The short produce life cycle requires the company has more flexiable supply chain, otherwise it will increase its inventory cost. Imagine that if Sony still placed its production in China,

Next factors that the producer must be consider is ethics of the country. As we knows every country must have their own code of ethics. Not only country but every company also have their own code of ethic. Code of ethics is a set of rules that can and cannot be do at the some place. So the producer must knows the thing that can and cannot be do at the country that they come to make a business. It is because to prevent against the ethics of the country.

Many organisations are meeting the need for lower cost by moving to foreign countries where there are fewer regulations that interfere with the manufacturing process, where they can find cheaper labour and thereby lower basic plant, personnel and operations cost. Sourcing and outsourcing are two basic methods of foreign manufacturing which have developed over time and this help in making the best choice for global