1. Do you think that ‘citizen journalism’ will eventually replace newspapers or merely supplement them?
Ans: I think that citizen journalism will not eventually replace newspapers but instead supplement them as they can’t produce news stories on their own but instead comment on news stories that is already been produced by professional journalist.
2. On the evidence to hand, do paywalls appear to be working?
Ans: Yes, the paywalls appear to be working. For example of the New York Times paywall which also provides the non-subscribers to read up to a certain amount of article before being asked to pay appears to be working. The paywalls of other companies like Wall street journal, Times of London, and the Sunday times appear to be working as well because of the number of people willing to pay if it has the value for what they’re paying which these companies are not failing to provide.
3.
…show more content…
Will there still be print newspapers in five years’ time? In ten years’ time?
Ans: Yes there will still be print newspapers in five years’ time as large number of population of the world are still deprived of internet which still rely on the traditional newspaper reading which most of the people still believe to be easy rather that reading the news on their cell phones or computers.
4. Will newspapers eventually have to get into the business of selling Kindle-type devices, such as electronic readers designed specifically for newspapers?
Ans: Yes newspapers eventually have to get into business of selling Kindle-type devices, such as electronic readers designed specifically for newspapers as now a days most of the news companies already have their own website that provides news to the public with the help paywalls that charge certain money, introducing such devices like kindle may make it easier for the general public to read news any time any
Jerkiewicz, who worked in the newspaper business for 15 years, said the subscriptions have fallen drastically. In 1995 the newspaper has about 24,000 copies in circulation, but in 2010, only has 9,000 copies in circulation. The readers however, had not quit reading the news, but had turned to online sources. He adds that magazines and newspapers should have a strong digital marketing plan. He thinks that traditional printing will continue to decline, but will never die out. There will still be a market, but it will just be smaller than it is now. He says that Kindle had not run print books out of business, and it never will. He adds that printing is so cheap now that printers are going out of business because falling subscription levels are leading to
“Los Angeles Times is the largest metropolitan daily newspaper in the country, with a readership of 1.5 million Monday through Saturday and 2.6 million on Sunday, more than 22 million unique latimes.com visitors monthly and a combined print and online local weekly audience of 4 million. The Pulitzer Prize-winning Times has been covering Southern California for more than 132 years” (Tribune Publishing, n.d.). From this published report company, it does not appear that the Los Angeles Tribune is dying anytime soon. Instead of a price ($) for paper, let us see what goes into getting the paper. The consumption of paper alone should make a consumer realize that a newspaper is better off read on the internet. In 2004, 8 million tons of office paper was used, which equals 178 million trees. Growth- global paper products consumption has tripled over the past three decades and was expected to grow another half by 2010. Can you imagine what it was
Opportunity is the key word for the newspaper industry right now. According to experts, neither digital advertisement revenues nor paywall subscriptions are the answer. Innovation needs to be present in order to define the future of the industry. For example, some added value needs to be present to merit the payment for content that was previously free or can be found using numerous substitute products free of charge.
I do not know about you, but our baby boomers are the most known for still reading the newspaper only because a lot of them still cannot adapt to the computerized world. Citizens that are somewhat uneducated, unemployed, live in rural areas, new to the area, younger than 20 or older than 60, have isolated themselves from social activities and social communications, and are strongly committed to a specific political party (Wanta & Yu-Wei & Yi-Chen, 1995). That information still fits to this day. The most interesting part is that the ones who really read the newspapers are the business people. For instance, “The Wall Street Journal is read by people who run the country, the Washington Post is read by people who think they run the
Just under five percent of Internet users take advantage of adblocking software in some form, and those numbers are increasing every year. In addition to the obvious boon of cleaning up the aesthetic of a page’s content, so it’s easier for you to read and enjoy, adblocking software can decrease data consumption and help protect you from malware, viruses, data theft, and the like. It can also improve battery life.
Competition in this industry is high and the trend is increasing. The top U.S. newspapers by total average circulation- from digital subscriptions, print products and other papers that use their branded content are,
The thesis in “Kindle vs. iPad” is “Both the iPad and Kindle offer a reasonably pleasant digital reading experiences; however, they vary substantially in terms of their overall capabilities” (Ingram). The authors support the thesis by comparing the differences between the two electronics.
The early 1900’s could be called the consolidation era as technological changes and competition for advertising dollars increased the competitive drive for circulation numbers. In response to these changes, many newspaper chains grew as smaller newspapers were gobbled up and absorbed into the chains or became obsolete. Complementing the glitz of the roaring twenties, a new form of journalism emerged that appealed to a different type of reader with its illustrious smaller size. But, as economic conditions worsened into the 1930’s, circulation increased while revenues did not. This is mostly due to advertising dollars being split between radio and television as both gained in popularity. By 1945, newspapers had declined to their lowest and continued to drop further alongside continued consolidation efforts into the 1970’s. While daily circulation declined, chains and printing expenses grew. The closer we got to the turn of the century and the digital age, readership dropped significantly as young readers pursued other options for news (Dominick, 2013).
Laura Finley states in her article “The Decline of Newspapers Is Bad for the US” that there has been quite a decline in newspapers in recent years. The cause of this decline is none other than our beloved internet. The biggest decline in newspapers was between October 2008 and March 2009. In this time period average newspaper sales decreased by 7.1 percent compared to the year prior. (14-15) Advertising revenues declined by an outstanding 30 percent in the first quarter of 2009! (15-16)
Most of the time the news content is available in real time and can be accessed anytime and almost anywhere in the world. The majority of the online news providers do not require a fee. As a result, the number of readers willing to pay for the news has gone down, causing a direct impact on the sales of the printed newspapers.
The belief that journalism is in decline has triggered major alarms, because society needs an informational environment that is easily available to all citizens such as newspapers. There is a large body of journalist that suggests that if television has taken over from the press as our main source of news this may limit our capacity to learn about public affairs; newspapers are believed to be far more effective than television at conveying detailed information necessary to understand complex and detailed issues. There is also widespread concern that if journalism fails as a profession it will not be able to reach large sections of the community, particularly younger or less educated readers. This may reinforce a growing gap among citizens between the information that they receive.
Unlike the TV news, newspaper are portable and has no time limited, this has the advantages that people can read them whenever they want. But I believe that getting news from TVs is due to its efficiency, convenience and easy understanding is a lot better than just reading the
In this era, the popularity of citizen journalism has spread throughout all over the world. As a matter of fact, more and more people are starting to take benefit of content publishers. This can be seen in Television news, such as winter snow photos, traffic accidents or local sporting events. However, it leaves a question, what exactly is news anyway? What do you need to be a citizen journalist? What is its impact on today's fast-paced society? Basically, a lot of people think this is a great thing and it can be a good tool for promoting interaction between the media community and the community. There are pros and cons of citizen journalism, we need to face this issue critically and dialectically (Techopedia, 2017). On the one hand, citizen journalism has some benefits that professional journalism can not provide. Firstly, comparing with professional journalism, citizen journalism provides a wider range of news and fills the gaps in mainstream media. The main body of the dissemination of citizen journalism is ordinary citizens rather than professional journalists or professional media. People can through the Facebook, microblog,Twitter to publish news which happened around their life. Delicacy, beautiful scenery, sports events, entertainments, political commentary can be seen in Weibo, Twitter, Facebook and so on. Secondly, citizen journalism could stimulate the interest of audience. Most audiences enjoy reading
A citizen journalist is not a citizen reporter- They use the same professional skills trained journalists use to tell the story of their community.
On the other hand, Tepp’s argument that SOPA and PIPA are the answer to these issues is flat out incorrect. Gregory Mead of analysis firm Semetric offers clues to why this is, “Data around the blocking of [websites] in the UK last April showed little negative impact on file sharing, which would have been due to the slew of copycat sites set up on proxy servers” (Mead, (as cited in Farivar, 2013)). Given the scope of the internet, this ineffectiveness is hardly a surprise. The use of a copycat proxy server, as mentioned by Mead, is just one of many circumvention tools that can effectively nullify any government blacklist. With further methods only a simple Google search away. There will always be someone out there doing their best to fight the system and take advantage of anonymity. Simply putting out what amounts to a small road-block offers no real threat to any of these enterprising criminals.