What Happens When There Is a Surplus of Imports Brought Into the Us

I think it also works to undo the notions that China was stealing away all our jobs in the apparel arena, because despite the complex protectionist measures taken, America still lost lots of jobs in the textile industry. The author points out that this is because of technology, and that when it really comes down to it, China is losing their textile jobs at a rate faster than the U.S. did (142). She also goes over some of the unintended consequences of the measures such as increased material costs as a result of the increased import barrier (142). She also suggests in this section as an alternative to erecting trade barriers, to instead compensate workers of the losing industries, known as the compensation principle (151). Lastly, with the lift of the measures and quotas by 2005, there will be a new surge in Chinese goods to America, as illustrated in figure 9.1, page 167. China’s percent increase after release from the quotas will measure some 900%.

From January until October in 2010 imports from China to the United States this year were $299,026.0 million and only $72,276.2 million in exports to China, leaving a U.S. trade deficit of -226,749.8 million - this is according to the U.S Census Bureau U.S Foreign Trade Statistics. Here we can examine that Chinese

With trade, a growing population, and the government not being able to pay for things came hyperinflation, simply a great depression. Although we are a leading economic nation right now, China’s economy is at an incredible pace and can and in many ways already has taken over ours. As Rome did, we often overextend our reach beyond the point of return on investment. We owe China lots of money to begin with from buying things from them, and also borrowing money. From what I understand, if China sells off our treasury yields, it will make our currency not worth as much. When our currency isn't worth as much it causes inflation, which can cause a major downfall.

As every day passes China grows stronger in every aspect and eventually they will be knocking on America’s doorstep in each of those categories. Economically, China is closing rapidly, but even the sleeping giant as Napoleon Bonaparte called it, has its limits. To be blunt, China is resource hungry and who knows what their country will do next. With the level of nationalism that their people have, China could go in multiple directions. For example, let us look at both China attempting to exert control over the South China Sea and also with the Senkaku Islands. Both of these areas are becoming more and more hostile, which ultimately could lead to deadly military engagements. With that being said, Blij also proposes an argument that I have been pondering for a while and that is a potential cold war between the U.S.A. and China. On the outside it seems as if there is a potential collision course to that conclusion. However, Blij does offer an interesting solution to this possibility and it is one that I believe should be the strongest takeaway. Blij suggests that trade, scientific, cultural and educational links and exchanges can be the solution to this issue. After all, China is responsible for many of the essential aspects to our life. Therefore, the least we as Americans can do is learn the various geographical aspects that encircle

Many critics might argue that the United States government should not regulate imports more heavily because it is bad for the United States economy. According to (insert source), a year ago the United States gross domestic product was almost $15.7 trillion, as per the Bureau of Economic Analysis. This was the consequence of the expansion of around $2.18 trillion in fares and the subtraction of $2.75 trillion in imports. As an aftereffect of this, numerous make the

Current state of the U.S. macro economy Import surplus There can never be any country in the world which can survive on its own without being involved in international trade with other countries. Even the United States a super power can not have an economy which is growing or even raise the wages of our citizens unless we extend our trade beyond our borders and sell products and at the same time buy products from the rest of the population outside our country. We import a lot of goods from other countries. There are instances whereby there can be surplus in the goods that are imported in the United States. For instance the United States is a huge importer of automobiles. A surplus in the imported automobiles can have certain consequences on businesses as well as consumers. This will lead to a price drop of the automobiles. This is good news to the consumers as they will purchase them at lower prices. On the other hand this is bad news to the businesses since the price drop will make them incur a lot of losses.

I agree with the author, because China’s economy has been closely integrated with the world economy, including the United States. On the one hand, it is impossible to destroy the Chinese economy while protecting the American economy and consumers. If a trade

China has a population of 1,300,000,000 (16+), and only about 770,000,000 people are involved For each item China produces for the United States, it helps China’s economy. China would definately not produce goods if it didn’t benefit them in some way. China’s economy continues to prosper everyday because they continue to produce and sell goods to other countries. Prices in China are a lot cheaper in comparison to the United States. Factory workers do not make a lot of money, but they make good money for the work they do. The average China factory worker makes $500 a month, but keep in mind that the prices in China are lower than the United States. These are the reasons that China chooses to produce goods for the United

Placing tariffs on imported products sounds like an easy fix but to me it isn’t quite that simple. We have to look at the needs of our people and by placing tariffs on imports it will because the pricing of these products to go up and some of us can’t afford for that to happen. The tariff won’t have any impact on making the products we make here cheaper it might have the opposite effect as materials needed to produce our products might be included within the tariff causing our products to increase in price, this wouldn’t be good for our lower income citizens. Instead

Our president strikes again when it comes to importing and exporting goods to/from the United States. In a news article I found they talked about President Trumps and a potential trade war with China and what it may look like. A trade war would mean abandoning an institution that recognizes that countries are stronger when they work together. President Trump action might possible start a trade war with China according to a statement from economist.com when they stated “Mr. Trump might, with some justification, accuse China of boosting its economy with subsidies and flooding some American markets with cheap imports”.

Impacts of International Trade International trade may also have an influence on the Gross Domestic Product or GDP, domestic markets, and university students. The GDP is “the total market value of all final goods and services produced in an economy in a one-year period” (Colander, 2010, p. 183). The GDP can contract if the U.S. is consuming more than it produces. As a result, if the imports are greater than the exports, domestic markets may lose earnings because income is being generated in the world market. If the U.S. has more exports than imports, domestic markets can increase their profit margins because of the demand for their products through international trade. University students are also affected by this method of trade because of the jobs that can be created or that are decreased. University students on decided career paths or those who have already began their career, will benefit if there is a trade surplus. With a substantial trade surplus, it can create more job

In the long run, I don’t think that the United States will be better off if it limits auto imports. However, it depends on the United States economic situation. If the United States doesn’t have a comparative advantage in making automobiles, then they shouldn’t make their own automobiles. The opportunity cost of producing automobiles at the expense of producing another more productive good or service, would counteract the money made from making domestic automobiles.

What Would Happen if the New T-shirt Market Operated as a Free Market? The producers in the new T-shirt value chain do not operate in a free market system. Government protectionist measures such as subsidies, quotas, and tariffs have limited economic success to a fortunate few. According to the

The Argument for Tariffs Although tariffs usually cause domestic prices to increase they can have a positive effect on our economy and specifically our domestic producers of steel and their employees. The US trade policy has historically been protectionist in nature, and congress, the principle body of power for import policy, heavily favored domestic firms over their foreign competitors (Irwin 146). As a result, domestic steel producers have had tariffs and quotas in place for many years. An effective tariff raises revenue for our US government and can help to subsidize domestic production at the expense of foreign producers. This is good because the American government receives money from foreign exporters that it would not have otherwise had access to. This money can then be used in domestic government policies and could

In recent years, the US has increased tariffs on the steel industry in order to restrict