What I Think Philosophy Should Be Taught On Their Thinking Process And Intellectual Imagination Essay

Descartes had a dream that was kind of strange. The dream he had felt so real it made him think about that demons are real. In his dream he sits by a fire in his room, and he was able to feel the heat from the fire. He said it felt like he was able to feel it in real life. Descartes stated that “for all he knows, he may be under the control of an all-powerful being bent on deceiving him”. When he saying under control of an all-powerful being he saying he might not even be physically real he might be an illusion. For some odd reason what he is saying you can’t base anything on reasoning you don’t even know if you are a real being. This knowledge is more certain than knowledge from the senses because of the dream he had. When you are in a dream you are not able to reason in your dream it just comes to you. He wasn’t think about having a fire in his room dreams come natural. Usually when somebody decide on something or choosing something they use

Descartes’ dream argument states that there are no differences between dreaming and being awake, which means there is no way of knowing if we are ever awake or dreaming. This is why he says we could always be in a dream. This means that everything we sense may not be real, just false perception of reality. The things we see in our dreams are stored in our mind. This helps Descartes determine what real knowledge is.

According to Descartes’, “As I think about this more carefully, I see plainly that there are never any sure signs by means of which being awake can be distinguished from being asleep.” This is the fundamental principle of the Dreaming Argument. The scenarios in which we experience whilst we are asleep are comparable to the scenarios we experience whilst we are awake. Often, we struggle to tell from our own perspective where our experiences are derived from; it is difficult to differentiate whether our experiences stem from reality or our dreams. The issue with this is that our unconscious

The Dreaming argument first showed up in Descartes First Meditation, where he focusses on the task to educate himself on his own doubt. When meditating he starts to think about how he has a hard time distinguishing himself from being asleep and awaking. This is how the dreaming argument came forth. The Dreaming Argument easily said is “If I am certain of anything, then I have to be certain that

In order for Descartes to doubt the existence of the external world, he has to establish that he could be dreaming. In Descartes’ first meditation, he points out that our senses sometimes deceive us, and that we should not trust something that has already been proven unreliable. He recalls that he has been deceived by his senses before in dreams where he was so convinced that he was

Dream Skepticism has been debated largely since Descartes’ projection of those ideas. Descartes believed many irrational thoughts in relation to dreaming, which proposed ideas that nobody at his time had ever seen before. Descartes’ challenging of the traditional ideas and proposing new ones in which challenged the minds of the individuals, as well as trying to convince the masses that dreaming had some sort of value for an individual that would carry on into his conscious world. Throughout these different ideas lied his main notion: the dreams produced in the human brain while unconscious are not false or fiction, rather, they present the truths that lie in our very minds and therefor should hold value to the dreamer himself. Descartes believed

Descartes explains his doubts by comparing the senses in one’s waking state and one’s sleeping state. Descartes argues that he dreams of things that seem real to him while he is asleep. For example, he sometimes dreams of sitting by a fire in his room, and in the dream he is able to sense the warmth of the fire, just as he normally feels it when he’s actually awake. Consequently, if his senses can cause him to feel the heat of the fire when he does not really feel it, he can’t trust that the fire exists when he feels it in his waking

In this argument, Descartes writes, “there are never any sure signs by means of which being awake can be distinguished from being asleep”. This quote is central and is a fundamental premise of his rationalization. In other words, what Descartes is essentially saying is that when you are awake you cannot truly differentiate between dream

Descartes in the fourth paragraph of the excerpt ends with the conclusion that there exists no evaluation that one can use to determine whether or not he is dreaming because based on his experience, the encounter with either world are so alike that one can hardly tell which one is reality and which one is a dream.

Descartes claimed that anything that is based on senses to distinguish reality from dreams should be doubted because sometimes he is convinced that he is sitting by the fire, only to realize he is actually lying in bed (Windt). This shows his skepticism because if we can’t be certain of whether we are dreaming or not, then how can we be certain of anything around us? Descartes’ doubt about reality is skeptical thinking because our belief about anything that is real and existent could be yet another dream and our perceptions could be false

Descartes uses three arguments to question what we’ve previously known about doubt: the dream argument,

Throughout high school, I was heavily involved in speech and debate, competing in the “sport” for three years. Although I faced many arduous challenges within the activity, I learned the importance of examining various aspects of life in a systematic and thorough way. Likewise, as I read Plato’s Apology, I began to realize that an essential part of simply living our lives is to also examine and dig deeper into our internal being. In fact, Socrates exclaimed that “an unexamined life is not worth living” (Plato, 2006, para. 68), but what does he mean by this? When Socrates made this bold statement, I believe that he was stating that we should always question, examine, and define our lives. Why? Because if we don’t examine our own lives,

In the process of questioning his own existence Descartes starts by denying the existence of his body and his senses, perhaps the two most important things that we humans associate with our being. He biases these denials on the fact that he had dreams before that had seemed just as vivid as ‘real life’ perhaps he

Maybe on a deeper level Socrates might have been talking about analyizing the purpose of one's life. This in my opinion is just as important. I feel that in order for me to succeed in life I have to at least examine the meaning of my being. I believe that it comes to a point in every persons life where they sit back and think "why am I here?" Whether it happens often or not, I wouldn't believe any person of sane health that said they never once thought about it. Socrates also said that "the good of life is knowledge." He believed in a higher good in life that could be achieved through an endless search for knowledge. His definition of higher good was when virtue and knowledge united. Although I agree that what Socrates speaks of is an important part of living, I would not go so far as to say it is the reason for liveing. I say this partially because of my definition of knowledge. I see knowledge not as just to be found in the universe, but in a way created by humans not unlike myself. Many things that are classified as knowledge such as: language, mathematics, and history are all human created. Our language was created by people in earlier civilizations, as well as mathematics. History is the story of these early people and civilizations. Should I assume that my reason for living is to learn of someone else's life? If so, what was that person's meaning for living? Undoubtitly these things are

Descartes states that the world we live every day might all the false due to the devil demons, external worlds could be mistaken, which we should never fully trust the external world, it is necessary to doubt our sense in the external world. We cannot be sure that everything that our sense is telling us is truth because we are dreaming or not. Therefore, Descartes also doubts if the dream is separate from the reality, and how are we able to distinguish the difference between dreaming and awake. Descartes provides an example of either