What Is A Controversial Issue Affecting Our Society

Abortion is a controversial debate in the United States that divides the nation and still plays a significant role at election time. The Democratic Party supports abortion rights and keeping elective abortions legal because they believe in the privacy and equality of women. They believe that a woman must have the right to choose regardless of her ability to pay. “The Democratic Party strongly and unequivocally supports Roe v. Wade.”1 For example, Bernie Sanders, as a Democratic candidate, said, "I happen to believe that it is wrong for the government to be telling a woman what to be doing with her own body."2 On the other hand, Republicans say the unborn child has a fundamental right to live and they support a human life amendment to the Constitution. They believe that Roe v. Wade should be overturned and abortions should not be legal.3 Donald Trump, as a Republican candidate, has suggested that if abortion is criminalized, women should receive some type of punishment if they secure an abortion. The President of the United States can has many effects on federal abortion policy. Most important of all, the President has the power to appoint justices to the United States Supreme Court. For instance, Obama and Clinton appoint justices who will uphold the present abortion laws that allow abortions. Also, the President may sign or veto legislation related to abortion like President Bush has signed “the Partial-Birth Abortion

The issue of abortion is one of the most controversial topics of our time, but recently the amount of public interest has grown exponentially. A number of bills regarding this policy issue such as Defund Planned Parenthood Act of 2015 and Child Interstate Notification Act have both greatly influenced the public’s opinion of abortion. Although, the issue of abortion hasn’t always been like this; according to Timeline of Abortion Laws and Events, an article from the Chicago Tribune, “The earliest anti-abortion laws were intended to protect women from untrained abortionists.” (Timeline) Since the 1973 passing of the Supreme Court Case, Roe V Wade, women have been able to obtain the abortion procedure in all 50 states, 46 of which were

Congress is using bills like the Hyde Amendment to erode at Roe v. Wade until it doesn’t exist anymore (Engstrom 17). The opposition argues that the government doesn’t have any control over the poverty aspect of abortions (Engstrom 10). In actuality, they are just trying to refrain from infringing on the fetuses right to life, something that hasn’t been granted legally as of yet (Manninen 38). I argue that the Courts continue to rule on laws and legislation that impose undue financial burdens, such as the Hyde Amendment, and induce women to seek poor alternatives to abortions (Engstrom 25). The consequences of seeking these alternatives are potentially deadly (McGee

The United States Federal Government has different views about abortion. These “different” views directly affect the women of America. The President produces an Executive Order. Congress puts a “rider” in place and the Courts begin legal abortion in 1973. Executive Order Number 13535 concerning the Affordable Care Act was ordered by President Obama in 2014. This Act mandated health care for all Americans and is sometimes called Obama Care. This executive order was to make clear that the government would not allow us of federal funds for abortion services. The only exception was in case of incest, rape, or the health of the mother. The order also mentions the Hyde Amendment as one of its foundations policies that restricts what the government

Although abortion has been a very controversial issue throughout history, I will inform you on the recent law and policy in which has developed over the past forty years. Beginning in the early seventies, the famous Roe v. Wade decision began the controversial segregation of the right to abortion. The decision stated that “women, in consultation with their physician, have the right to have an abortion in the early stages of pregnancy.” (“Induced Abortion in the United States,” July 2014). Roughly twenty years later, and in the early nineties, the Planned Parenthood v. Casey readdressed the policy of abortion and gave the states more power to assist

Beginning with the 1973 landmark decision in Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court has consistently guarded the abortion rights of women in America. Abortion advocates have praised the decision for decades, and it has become a staple, however controversial, of American law. Throughout the following decades, various cases reached the Court that forced it to reconsider its decision, and Roe v. Wade was always upheld. This changed in 2007 with Gonzales v. Carhart, the first decision in which the Court allowed certain abortion rights to be curtailed. Much evidence suggests that Gonzales is the beginning of a new trend, and that the Court may begin to slowly allow abortion rights to be eroded. Behind this change lies a battle between conservatives and liberals, not about abortion, but about the role of the Supreme Court in American politics. Unfortunately, the abortion issue, difficult in of itself, is being used as a stage on which to fight a much larger battle about our government’s structure, unnecessarily perpetuating the controversy and uncertainty surrounding abortion policy in the United States. As a result of this, it may be better for abortion advocates in pursuit of their cause to avoid the Supreme Court altogether.

Women’s reproductive rights were on center stage when a case from Texas made its way to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court heard the case Roe v. Wade, and nullified a Texas law making it illegal to abort a fetus during a pregnancy, for any reason.2 The court moved a traditionally state-regulated policy into a federally protected right for women.3 What some legal analysts feel is odd, is the arbitrary way the justices decided the first-trimester timeline, and if the Constitution can recognize right to privacy.4 The ruling was a split decision, and has still kept the country split in their

In our long history as well as in the modern society, childbearing and motherhood have undoubtedly held a great weight in most women’s lives. We cannot deny that a woman’s choice to bear a child or not would have significant impact on the health and welfare of a woman. Although it is important that the government’s act is intended to protect profound respect for human life, the Court’s decision would allow the federal government to overstep the boundary of a woman’s liberty and discerning decision. The Act would impose an undue burden and substantial obstacles on a woman’s right to abortion. Power to enact a law to promote welfare of individuals is vested with the state, not Congress, unless otherwise such power is expressly prohibited by the Constitution. In the present case, the state’s power to regulate procedural options for a legal abortion is not expressly prohibited by the

The Severity of Abortion and its Role in the No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act

The issue of abortion is notoriously controversial. Since the Supreme Court’s 1992 ruling in Casey v. Planned Parenthood, states have enacted different restrictions on the procedure. These restrictions vary from state to state. Nineteen states currently have laws prohibiting partial-birth abortion, and forty-one states strictly prohibit abortions except in cases of life-endangerment. One particularly incendiary area of abortion law is that of public funding. However, as of this year there are only seventeen states that cover abortion procedures through public funding. In this paper we will discuss federal abortion legislation, while describing the laws and political ideologies of the following states: Texas, California, New

In the Executive Branch, the President doesn’t approve of abortions. President Obama is trying to

Since Trump has been appointed to office, he and his administration have created three proposals to advance the process of the fight against termination. The administration plans to erode abortion laws by appointing new judges and create executive orders to stop funding abortion clinics. They do this in hope of ultimately overturn the Roe v Wade statute.

Over the past few years the topic of abortions has risen. While under Obamas rule, abortions have been given easier access. As President Barack Obama delivers his last State of the Union to the United States as its president, looking back on his history made as the most pro-abortion president ever. He made no doubts about his support of abortion before he had even become president, he had even voted several

One of the most controversial situations in the United States is abortion. A couple of decades ago when abortion was illegal, thousands of woman died for attempting to terminate the child’s life themselves or with unprofessional help. On January 22, 1973, in the Roe v. Wade case, Supreme Court legalized abortion in all 50 states. This has saved thousands of woman’s lives and should remain legal.

The National Abortion Federation is an organization that supports all of the above views and more and publishes numerous resources covering a wide range of subjects related to abortion for health care providers, medical educators, patients and the public. In face of myths and misinformation about abortion, NAF's resources provide medically accurate information that enables women and the public to make informed choices. Their policy focus on the importance of women having access to safe and legal abortion options. They believe that in recent years Congress has made this impossible by banning safe abortion procedures, voting to make a fetus a person for the purposes of federal criminal law, and restricted access to abortion for federal employees, military dependents, Native Americans, and low-income women. They quote the fact that during his eight year stay in office President Bush has nominated over 200 anti-choice judges to the federal bench, has made a host of other anti-choice appointments to non-judicial posts, and has signed anti-choice legislation passed by Congress, and has used his administration to further policies limiting access to safe and legal abortions. Their view is that abortion providers offer quality care to woman in the face of hostility, harassment, and threats of violence. They advise that reproductive health care providers undertake comprehensive security measures to keep staff and