Being humane or inhumane is it something we learn or something we decide to become? Does it only apply to a person or a group of people? In this essay, Dick Gregory presents two scenarios of inhumanity with parallel outcomes. The way both scenarios are structured gives a better view of who seems to be the good, bad and the ugly. His economic status, as well as his skin color, contributes to how society perceives him throughout his experience. Despite the circumstances, he did everything in his power to be like his idol regardless of his health. The first introduces a small child of the age of seven whom does not recall learning to shame in his house where it should As a child, Richard sees the world in positive view doing the best to …show more content…
The instructor had the right to correct the misunderstanding of Richard, on the other hand, her choice of words and tone of voice was unforgivable. The overwhelming emotion to buy himself a daddy by quintupling his original amount caused him a grave mistake followed by a lesson he did not expect to learn at that moment. Her patience came to a halt when he offered a donation from his “daddy”. She then proceeded by slapping him with the cold truth by saying, “We are collecting this money for you and your kind, Richard Gregory. If your daddy can give fifteen dollars you have no business being on relief”, she then added, “We know you don’t have a daddy”. In that instance he became the center of attention. Helene quickly turned to see him with a teary eyes that showed sympathy towards him. There was much shame in the room, his eyes were full of tears which caused him to run away. From his perspective, it was as if everyone in the world witnessed his shame. His fellow classmates just felt sorry for him, but said nothing when the instructor lashed out at him. Now he understood that society was cruel to him by hosting their events such as the Worthy Boys Annual Christmas Dinner. It was if ignorance was a blessing rather than the harsh reality of his status. The jacket he received from welfare singled him out from the crowd not to mention it …show more content…
This time he was a couple of years older and was capable of support himself by acquiring his own money shining shoes and selling newspapers. It is clear he no longer depends on welfare or is subjected to the humiliation of wearing any of their labeled clothing. He describes having goo-gobs of money which (according to the Urban Dictionary) means saying an overabundance isn’t enough. He was able to buy forty-five cents worth of food from his own money which is surely more than enough just for him. While he enjoys his meal an old wino walks in and takes a seat on the counter. He mentions that he likes winos because they only hurt themselves thus it is good because no one else has to feel any pain. It is disturbing how any reasonable person would find that to be good maybe he has started to lose a bit of his own humanity. The fact that no one tried to ask if he was able to afford a meal seems very unsettling as if there is a way for him to pay regardless of his status. After eating his meal worth of twenty-six cents the wino stated to the owner he had no money to pay for it. In reaction to his statement the owner jumped over the counter knocking down the wino along while also beating him on the head with a pop bottle. It caused the wino to bleed but the owner proceeded to kick him over and over again and because of that Gregory decided it was enough. He offered to
William Golding, winner of the 1983 Nobel Prize for Literature, argues in his 1954 book Lord of the Flies that humans are evil in nature. He uses multiple symbols to define what savagery really is and how it can affect even the youngest of society. Some symbols, such as painted faces or a pig's head on a stick are used as shocking narrative tools but are necessary in order to portray these children as ruthless monsters. Golding’s use of painted faces does symbolize that when there is anonymity, humans will commit atrocious acts, especially if they are in a position of power.
In the beginning of the story a poor boy named Roger tried to steal money from Luella Bates pocketbook, to buy himself some blue suede shoes because he had no one else that would . Luella Bates caught Roger and instead of turning him in she brought him home with her. Luella Bates took Roger home and got him washed up and fed. She talked to Roger about how stealing wasn't a right thing to do, and how she also used to do worse. Luella Bates treated him like a son and even gave him money to buy the shoes he wanted. So in the end Roger Realized that even though he didn't have a family to care for him he still had people that would care for him in his community like Luella Bates. The theme of the story ¨Thank-you, Ma'am¨ is that you shouldn't look down on struggling people because the steal, you should put yourself in their shoes and help them out. often times they steal because the have no money or people to provide the things that they need.
At that time, he was in love with one of his classmates, Helene Tucker. Richard did everything he could to impress Helene including leaving money he had made from shining shoes and selling newspapers on her stoop; he also used a lady’s handkerchief to wipe his nose so Helene wouldn’t see him wipe his nose on his shirt sleeve. Because Helene was clean, good, smart, and had a father, Richard regarded her a symbol of everything he wanted because of the importance he placed on Helene and the fact that Helene did not know how poor he was or that he didn’t have a father. One day The teachers in Richard’s school was asking students how much money their fathers were going to donate to the Community Chest before the welfare checks were issued so that each class could contribute to this local charity. In order to impress Helene, Richard was going to take this opportunity not only to make it look like he had a father but that his father would give more than Helene’s father. Richard’s teacher called on all the students in class except Richard to tell how much their fathers were going to
In our society, we are able to witness how our prejudices can affect the way people live. At times, there are people who come forward and confront the injustice in our lives and try helping the victims. However, there are numerous occasions were we fail to confront the prejudice, and take no notice of the consequences that may result; this is evident in the novel, To Kill a Mockingbird where the numerous prejudices and injustices heaped upon various characters brings the society itself to moral conflict. We witness first hand how failing to confront various types of prejudices may result large repercussions.
This section shows that the boy believes he has a responsiblitiy to help his father stay alive and to make sure that he is taking care of himself. The boy shows this by making him a cup of hot chocolate. Although the world has changed vastly, the bond between father and son is still holds fast. The father attempts to keep the fire of life and the will to live alive in the boy by telling him stories that demostrated great courage and sought to promote justice.
Through this direct informal education, parents can teach their children the skills and roles they would need as adults. Though this mother has almost nothing material to give her son, she gives him what all children need, love. Think about the pain this mother feels that she cannot give her son those basic needs that people have. He has no clothes, no furniture, and very little food, but what he does have is love and happiness. We seem to forget that those simple things are as important as any of the others.
Every child on this planet right now, despite how caring or considerate they may seem while young, possesses the capability of developing into an inhumane and cruel individual. Their growth is fully dependant on how they are raised. Children that are left to fend for themselves and make their own decisions will consequently resort to savagery. This is the point that William Golding is trying to convey to the reader in both his comprehensive novel, Lord of the Flies, and “Why Boys Become Vicious”, an article written for the San Francisco Examiner in 1993 after two ten-year-old Liverpool boys are charged with offenses of kidnap and murder of two-year-old James Bulger. Many different factors coincide to influence someone to act cruelly, but the
Since the story uses a certain object, the Jacket, as the meaning of several issues, it primarily focuses on the narrator's poverty-stricken family. First of all, an example of the poverty is demonstrated when the narrator complains that the jacket "was so ugly and big that I knew I'd have to wear it a long time"(paragraph 3). It is clear that his lack of money was a problem in which he
What keeps the savage urges of humanity at bay? It is morality, a conscience that tells mankind right from wrong. Without morals, what would become of society other than anarchy, there would be nothing to push people to be compassionate. In his book “Lord of the Flies” , William Golding gives narratives on what the consequences are when one abandons their ethics. Golding’s novel defends his position on the brutality held within humanity, and whether one resists it. The capacity for evil and savagery is within every human being, but can be restrained by committing to one’s morals.
100. Professor Fuchs calls on Jeanette to talk about whether or not poverty was the result of drug abuse and misguided entitlement program or because of cuts in social-service program and the failure to create economic opportunities for the poor. They get into an argument over what the answer is and eventually Professor Fuchs says “What do you know about the lives of the underprivileged?” This statement angers her because she used to live an underprivileged life. It shows that she is still keeping the secret that she her family was poor.
This short video “GIFT” has two significant roles, the son and the father. The son’s character revealed a selfish personality labelling his father as unsuccessful and lacked respect for him, which affected their relationship. The father was the main character and hero also known as the protagonist (Dinham, 2014, p. 191). He was hard working, generous and the decision maker and suffered the consequences of his son’s actions who disconnected from his father when he left for university. The return from the foundation saw the son reminisce on his father’s words which assisted his son understand life values and helping others with “selfless” acts of kindness, and that life was “not about being rich, but how much you can give”.
Once upon a time… there was this girl named Jenna. She lived in an immense house and had many great friends. Her parents, Jack and Marie had really great jobs. Many of her friends considered her as “rich”. She loved her school and all of her friends and family. She had a brother, Johnathan who was 8 years old. She didn’t talk about him much, because he was sick with a very serious disease. He spent most of his time in the hospital, and so did her parents. The daily hospital trips costed tons of money and so did his medication and treatments. Jenna’s mom and dad took many days off of work because of her brother. One day she overheard her parents talking about a money situation. Jenna felt concerned and worried for her family. Her mom, Marie
Regrettably, this distinction arises from nothing commendable, or even remotely average. While the intent here has not been to attach moral judgments to the man's behaviors, the greater reality is that a simple comparison between M and an average man cannot help but illustrate severe and chronic deficiencies in the character of the former. A human's behavior essentially reveals the intrinsic worth of that human, as it reflects his ideas about life and humanity in general. In the case of M, and entirely opposed to the average man, the character is consistently self-destructive, unpleasant, and
Although being highly ambiguous, this very short story suggests the social tragedy of a poor family. The strength of this story is that it reflect a strong effect as the most detailed description of a familial
The protagonist provokes the audience to sympathize with the announcement of his mother’s death. He quickly rallies this with the disclosure of his “somewhat strained” relationship with his parents (605). Then, the protagonist goes on to address that it took him two years to learn about the circumstances surrounding his mother’s death. In any given circumstances, including “somewhat strained” relationship, it is beyond normal for anyone to take over two years to get acquainted with his/her mother’s death. Later on, the father goes on to reveal that he and the mother were ready to welcome the protagonist back despite them being “upset by his behavior” (606). This displays the one-sided effort put into their relationship. As the whole family seated themselves for the dinner, a family dinner, after a long time, this following incident ruined the charm and mood of the reunion.