What Is Digital ID Technology?

Voter ID laws in the United States have begun to create controversy since the beginning of its adaptations in the early 2000’s. Voter ID laws in the United States is a law that requires U.S. citizens to have a special form of identification in order to vote in an election. The idea with Voter ID laws is that the state must make sure that the laws do not pose any sort of burden on the voters. These laws have been proposed in order to stop voting fraud. However, the institution of Voter ID laws have made trouble in states, including Texas, regarding to the various amount of identification requirements needed.

There is no doubt that the attacks on 9/11 caused Congress to pass the Real ID Act in order to prevent foreign nationals from fraudulently obtaining a U.S. driver’s license. Congress said the Real ID Act is about security, not stigmas. The law was intended to set principles for states that issue licenses and to procure acceptable documents. However, due to budgets, there are not enough resources to verify the accuracy of these documents from foreign countries. This is based solely on three 9/11 hijackers being able to obtain state identification cards while using fictitious documents. In total, thirty three hijackers acquired state driver’s licenses. Unfortunately, stern stipulations have gradually decreased due to several states and local governments allowing Identification cards to be issued without distinguishing from an authentic driver’s license (Jeunesse, 2015).

Voter identification laws jeopardize the validity of our elections and create a climate in which people are disincentivized to vote. Voter identification laws aim to solve a problem that frankly does not exist. The main reason for their implementation is supposedly that they help in stopping the ‘widespread’ voter fraud in our American elections. However, voter fraud is such a miniscule problem that it can basically be overlooked, especially because of the electoral system works for the elections. According to Source D, researchers at Loyola Law School have found that "out of the one billion votes cast between 2000 and 2014, there were just 31 cases of voter fraud.

While the main purpose for voter ID is to eliminate fraud and corruption in the American voting system, it has brought with it consequences that discourage and even prohibit eligible voters to vote. The 2012 election, a vast number of state required a government-issued photo ID. Even the state Indiana required this even though “state GOP officials couldn 't provide a single instance of a voter committing the type of fraud the new ID law was supposed to stop” (Berman). Surprisingly, in Wisconsin, they will only except ID’s containing “a current address, birth date, signature and two-year expiration date” that so far

Many people believe that the law will help reduce voter fraud. In our day-to-day lives identification is required as a security measure. We are required to provide identification for simple things such as cashing a check, boarding a plane, and picking up a prescription. These identification requirements are legitimate

There are thirty states in the United States that require some form of official identification in order to register to vote and to vote for federal, state, and local elections. Voter identification laws ensure the integrity of elections by deterring impersonation fraud at the polls. Requiring a government-issued ID to vote will prevent voting under fake names or under the names of deceased voters, which according to The Pew Center of the States “more than 1.8 million deceased individuals are listed as voters”.

A policy formulation has long been underway in the form of national identification in order to supplement the right to vote. The only surefire way to combat this problem would be a Federal ID card that would be given to ensure that every citizen who is eligible to vote can vote, regardless of their states' laws on the matter (Cohen, 2016). However, this would override the Shelby County v. Holder court case that granted the matter to each individual state (Oyez, 2016). They go on to suggest that the Federal Government step back in and make it a right for all citizens to vote as they did during the Civil Rights Movement (Cohen, 2016). At the very least, the government should fund more programs itself in order to help mitigate the cost of obtaining identification. In Texas, some people have to drive up to 100 miles or more to obtain an identification card. While some groups have aided with this effort, I believe the state of Texas or the Federal government could easily mitigate the stress put on low-income and minority groups by creating a program to help more people vote (Ari, 2016). While other methods have been proposed, the literature review has shown that the Federal ID card is most likely to gain the most traction. Yet again, with the partisanship so divided, it would be hard to pass a bill such as this in a

In America, I-9 is a program that American firms rely upon to check whether one is an authorized employee or not. This system has many flaws because it’s easy to manipulate. E-Verify, a new and innovative way to check employee immigration status started to alleviate the problems I-9. In this essay, one can see what is E-Verify and the various arguments to E-Verify.

It’s no secret, the internet sensation has made many people redundant, however, over the past decade this global phenomenon has seen the birth of over 1.2 million jobs, dawning a new era for humanity. With rapid developments occurring in the design, development and implementation of technological discoveries. Traditional legal principles and processes are constantly challenged by the need to keep pace with new technologies. in particular, identity theft has skyrocketed since the rise of the internet; a 2012 survey conducted by the Australian Bureau of Statistics revealed 7% of respondents were directly affected by identity crime in the preceding six months. Identity theft not only affects Australian citizens it’s also a cancer to national security, in order for the government to beat this epidemic it’s imperative that harsher punishments are imposed on cyber criminals.

“Who Am I? Developing Character” by Jodi O’Brien is a secondary source. This piece discusses all the different factors that go into someone’s identity. One of Lyon’s main arguments is the benefits of a nation identification card as it pertains to security, convenience, and efficiency. In addition the benefits they have for enhancing security, Lyon says that national ID cards would make governments run more efficiently.

The REAL ID Act of 2005 is an Act of Congress that was designed to increase the safety of citizens throughout America. As a result of this law, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and the states began working together to implement rigorous standards validate and create documentation personal identification, like driver's licenses, identification cards, and other types of legal documentation.

Throughout the twenty-first century, technology has been one of the major focusses of people world-wide. Technology has even helped the unemployment rate by creating new jobs that wouldn’t have been around twenty years ago. Overall, technology is a helpful tool that is used to advance our knowledge of the world we live in. However, technology can also be used for wrong-doing. One example of how technology can be used for wrong-doing comes in the form of identity theft. According to Merriam Webster, identity theft is “the illegal use of someone’s personal identifying information in order to get money or credit.” For example, in modern-day America, companies are putting the personal information of their customers in the cloud, a data server that is connected to the internet. As technology advances, it is getting harder for companies to protect your personal information, and easier for identity thieves to hack into the cloud and steal it. Thankfully, President Obama is determined to strengthen cyber-security, and so he has introduced a series of proposals designed to aid the fight against identity theft. Firstly, Obama wants companies to share information with the government, in order to help the companies scan their servers for malicious software known as malware. Also, the president wants a system where customers will be alerted if their credit card is stolen, within a thirty

In the past decade, a total of 34 states have passed voter identification laws with the same guidelines from state to state. These laws require voters to show a proof of photo identification in order to be eligible to vote or receive a ballot at the voting polls. The initial purpose of the voter ID laws was to prevent voter fraud. However, the laws have made voting harder for some Americans, like minorities, women, students and elders by requiring a government issued photo ID.

Another outstanding feature of Estonia’s digital transformation is the data security and data privacy. By logging into the State Portal, residents can easily see which X-Road participants hold their information, which can access it, and which have accessed it. A Data Protection Inspectorate enforces proper usage, which allows the residents themselves to and take action themselves if they suspect a violation. In other words, individuals are owning all their data and have power over it.

Today, individuals are sacrificing privacy in order to feel safe. These sacrifices have made a significant impact on the current meaning of privacy, but may have greater consequences in the future. According to Debbie Kasper in her journal, “The Evolution (Or Devolution) of Privacy,” privacy is a struggling dilemma in America. Kasper asks, “If it is gone, when did it disappear, and why?”(Kasper 69). Our past generation has experienced the baby boom, and the world today is witnessing a technological boom. Technology is growing at an exponential rate, thus making information easier to access and share than ever before. The rapid diminishing of privacy is leaving Americans desperate for change.