In this argumentative essay I will be arguing why President Donald Trump's travel ban is a good thing and not a racist thing there are many reasons people all over the world and in the United States are trying to fight his ban. Many people are looking at this ban as a racist thing to keep muslims out of America people are assuming it's racist when he hasn't even said anything they judge him for everything he is doing for the United States. “Since 1979 Iran has been accused of supporting terrorism, providing funding,equipment,weapons and training. The U.S. and Iran's relations have been on edge for years. Syria probably one of the most dangerous countries in the world. Struck by a deadly war with terrorism sweeping the country. Recently there …show more content…
Sudan , Sudan has many issues that really aren’t put in the news one issue is they have terrorist training camps within their country. two is that they got out of a war 10 years ago(http://www.state.gov/j/ct/rls/crt/2014/239410.htm) Sudan honestly don’t think that should be on a list there never in the news but the only reason they should be is because of their terrorist training camps. Libya currently in the middle of a civil war and falling deeper into conflict because of term oil there are different group within libya fighting over land.(www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-13754897) Libya has many issues it's just common sense why they should be on the list. Trumps travel ban is a good thing, he is protecting the nation with this travel ban because these countries have terrorists and he is keeping us out of world affairs. In every country that is on trump's travel ban is on for good reasons these countries are in war and terrorism is sweeping their country America is not the only place for these refugees to seek a new life there is many other places for them to go trump is trying to protect the nation's security and the American people from a major threat. honestly , I don't think nothing should be done. I think there should be more countries put on the travel ban list in
Immigration has become an issue all around the world. Everyone have different opinions on how immigrants affect our society. Is immigration good for the economy, the employment rate for immigrants and their pay, how the ban could have a major impact on the U.S., why do people migrate, and DACA (deferred action for childhood arrivals). This essay will hopefully answer any question about immigration and we should handle the ban.
For many ongoing years now, Syria has been in a war with thousands of fleeing refugees, terrorists that could be attacking at any minute, and the constant involvement of other countries that has done more harm than their planned good. I believe that the foreign involvement of countries such as the US and Russia have fueled more of the ongoing violence in Syria.
The travel ban is something many think is what is necessary for national security. In the executive order 9066 it says “275,000 Japanese immigrated to Hawaii and Mainland.” Those were many people who migrated, and they did not really take that into much consideration. To the current day, many have migrated, but “entry into the United states, commonly known as the Muslim ban or the travel ban, was an executive order 13769 issued by United States President Donald Trump.” The president put up this executive order so keep people away, but at what cost?
A Federal Judge temporarily barred Trump’s Executive Order concerning the travel ban. This has caused extreme controversy among American’s as topics such as immigration, refugees, vetting, and religion all take tolls on the perspectives of the media as well as the average American. Nevertheless, the travel ban has been critiqued as well as praised by different groups and the Federal’s Judge’s emergency order has sparked debate on the constitutionality of the order.
Dear Mr. President is a satirical essay meant to point out the faults of the argument supporting the Muslim ban. The term “Muslim ban” refers to the executive order, sent out by President Donald J. Trump, restricting the inflow of immigrants from 7 majority muslim countries into the United States. The arguments for the order was that it kept terrorists out as the government prepares tests determining how much of a terror threat a person may be. Many people have claimed it institutionalised Islamophobia, would be step one towards deportation of Muslim (for being muslim), and that the countries banned are not the ones committing the terroristic acts. I used verbal irony, mock encomium, and word play to make their points be noticed.
President Donald J. Trump has issued an executive order that has banned immigrants from entering the United States of America. Enacting this prohibition would damage America’s reputation as the melting pot that we once were. A group of presidents of leading American colleges and universities wrote a letter urging Donald Trump to rectify the recent executive order. The authors use different strategies such as ethos, emotional appeal, and logos to persuade Donald J. Trump to rectify the executive order banning immigrants from the United States.
The Travel Ban marks a major turning point in the policies on immigration in the United States. Due to increased terrorist attacks and illegal immigrant numbers rising, it is believed that temporarily banning immigrants from particular countries is key to ensuring safety within the United States. Though many have expressed their concern towards the ban because of its similarity to previous discriminatory and unconstitutional acts. The ban has even been referred to as the “Muslim Ban”.
The issue of illegal immigration has become a major debate for everyone. June Johnson wrote “Crossing Borders: Immigration” in her book Global Politics, Local Arguments to introduce the topic of undocumented immigrants in the U.S expanding and the measures that the government has taken to solve the problem. In Chapter 4, Johnson presented Victor Davis Hanson, who wrote “Illegal Immigration Is Immoral” to expose how the proposals to fix illegal immigration has lost all moral credibility. Krishnadev Calamur wrote “What Trump’s Executive Order on Immigration Does-and Doesn’t Do.” on Jan 30, 2017 in The Atlantic to expose the impact that Trump’s Executive Order 1187 to ban the citizens of seven Majority-Muslim
So far, more than 1 out of 10 Syrians have been wounded or killed since the beginning of the war in 2011. “Syria’s civil war has created the worst humanitarian crisis of our time. Half the country's pre-war population — more than 11 million people — have been killed or forced to flee their
Syria’s civil war is the worst humanitarian crisis of modern time. The “Syrian Civil war Began in March of 2011, between rebel brigades and government force; economy and infrastructure is destroyed” (Library, 2016). “Divisions between secular and religious fighters, and between ethnic groups, continue to complicate the politics of the conflict” (Corps, 2016). Additionally, the Syrian civil war has taken a significant
Syria is located on the middle east and is really close to Europe or the area where we call Eurasia. It shares border with Jordan, Iran, Iraq and Turkey. For the problem, it began in early 21st century, Syria have encountered a civil war which has affected everything in the country, from the very basic needs to the serious issues.
But with the current scenario, people are being separated from their loved ones because they are born in a specific country! Banning young children and aging grandmothers from the six countries obviously isn’t the right move. Everyone knows that America always had strained relations with Muslim bearing countries and the ban deteriorates it even further. Notably, 97 tech companies suggest that this ban is bad for business (Reilly) Jared A Goldstein states that every president has deemed that anyone of any race, religion can become an American citizen as long as he/she upholds the Constitution (Goldstein) Based on the opposition received by the ban since day one, it is imperative that the people oppose it as much as they can.
The travel ban is an executive order which was put into place by President Donald Trump’s administration on January 27th, 2017. The order was put into place for our national security to “protect the nation from foreign terrorist entry into the United States.” This measure banned travel into the U.S. for 90 days from Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen. This obviously sparked an outcry from social media, which caused a divide among Americans. With a show of hands, how many of you think that the travel ban is actually a ban on Muslim refugees and that it is racist. Recent polls show that 57% of Americans favor the temporary ban while 33% are opposed to it, and 10% are still undecided. Racism, fascism, and Islamophobia; these words have all taunted supporters of President Trump and the travel ban. The one thing people don’t realize is that the travel ban isn’t banning Muslims from America. Who in the room can name the top 5 countries with the most Muslims. They are Indonesia, India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Nigeria. Not one of these countries are listed in the ban. This ban is only for only ninety days, and is aimed at countries who have sent a large contingency of terrorists to the U.S. The countries selected have active terrorist training camps, and Trump is not the individual who selected the countries on the list. These countries are unstable, with no reliable vetting procedures. We shouldn’t admit people until they can meet our security screening standards.
On Facebook, I sought out opinions on this social justice issue by searching through public postings for the hashtags #travelban, #muslimban, #nobannowall, #refugees, #Americafirst, and #buildthewall. The vast majority of views presented by those using these hashtags were against the ban. One common theme held by those against the ban is that it was discriminatory. By adding Venezuela and North Korea to the list, the social media opinion is that Trump is trying to distract from it being a racist ban targeting Muslims. For example, Aram Shahinfard (2017) states in his Facebook update, “So he added a few more countries to make it a not-muslim ban? It is still not acceptable!” His Facebook friend,
Be it resolved that the United States fully repeals the travel ban due to the discriminatory effects it has on some people. The travel ban is a terrible executive order that was put into place by President Trump on january 27th of 2017. The travel ban was put into place to protect the United States by not allowing any citizen from seven muslim countries to enter. These seven countries are; Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen. These countries were targeted due to supposed risks of these countries harboring extremists groups such as Isis or Al-qaeda. According to the article “Trump's executive order: Who does travel ban affect?,” by BBC News, “ The travel ban suspensions the US refugee program for 120 days, places and indefinite ban on Syrian refugees and suspends all visas of incoming immigrants of the seven banned countries” (BBC News). The seven countries are heavily muslim, however most of the people in these countries are no threat to the United States in any way. Why is the United States completely discriminating the islamic religion when we are founded on the basis of religious freedom. Not everyone who is muslim is a terrorists so why are we punishing a lot of good people for the actions of very few. Most of the terrorist attacks that have happened since 9/11 have been carried out by a U.S citizen, so are we going to start deporting all muslim U.S citizens? The islamic religion is not the problem it's the radicalistic idea that some people