What Is Edward Snowden Unethical

After September 11th, Americans looked to the government for protection and reassurance. However, they did not expect to find out thirteen years later that the government did this by using technology to spy on Americans, as well as other countries. George W. Bush began the policy shortly after the terrorist attack and Barack Obama continued it. There have been many confrontations over the years about the extent of the N.S.A.’s spying; however, the most recent whistle-blower, Edward Snowden, leaked information that caused much upset throughout America (EFF). It has also brought many people to question: is he a hero or a traitor?

Edward Snowden is responsible for exposing these government secrets. Many call this an act of treason, but it can also be seen as an act of civil disobedience. The most peaceful nature of his rebellion, and the unconstitutional behavior that it consequentially exposed qualify his actions. Although it was wrong of him to escape the consequences of his actions by fleeing to Hong Kong, his actions were ultimately beneficial to the American public. Being spied upon by the government is a direct violation of our right to privacy, and hiding it from the public is wrong as well. From John Cassidy’s article, “Why Edward Snowden is a hero,” he quotes Ellsberg; “‘This wholesale invasion of Americans and foreign citizens’ privacy does not contribute to our security; it puts in danger the very liberties we are trying to protect.’” The act of bringing these facts to light is an act of trying to preserve our liberty, and that’s what civil disobedience is all about.

Edward Snowden is considered by many to be a criminal, but there are others who firmly believe that Edward Snowden is a patriot, and rightfully so Edward Snowden is a hero to the American people and many abroad. The United States government has the responsibility to serve, protect and aid the American people, but sometimes the government and some of its classified documents every now and then get published and criticized. Edward Snowden had worked for multiple government agencies such as the CIA, NSA and prior to that an American contractor as a computer professional, and during his tenure at the NSA he had realized the grotesque and unprofessional ethics and violations of privacy against the American people, and so many innocent citizens

Edward Snowden. This is a name that will be in the history books for ages. He will be branded a traitor or a whistleblower depending on where you look. Many Americans feel that Edward Snowden is a traitor who sold the United States’ secrets aiming to harm the nation. Others believe that he was simply a citizen of the United States who exercised his right to expose the government for their unconstitutional actions. It is important to not only know the two sides to the argument of friend or foe, but to also know the facts as well. My goal in this paper is to present the facts without bias and to adequately portray the two sides of the argument.

The ethical issues involving Edward Snowden’s case encompass key issues of morality. Snowden’s actions are to be interpreted as right or wrong based on the circumstances and personal reasoning. The preceding interpretation is this case in every ethical quandary. Once these issues are assimilated to the affected parties we begin to understand the larger picture of morality and ethical reasoning in Snowden’s case.

Snowden is now seen as either a traitor or a hero by many. As a result of what snowden did, some persons see his actions as being unethical because of the fact that he may have violated a secrecy agreement but it can also show that the law was unjust and unconstitutional. In addition, the Attorney General of the United States, Eric Holder, also did not find Edward’s rationale to be very convincing. He stated, “He broke the law. He caused harm to our national security and I think that he has to be held accountable for his actions.”

The reason Edward Snowden has left his amazing life behind is not because he was forced to but it was because he felt a sense of duty to, and he did not want to be part of the government, specifically the NSA for what they were doing. Edward Snowden believed what the NSA did was wrong and he did not want to be part of an organization as this. In this interview of Edward Snowden, he was asked multiple question and one of the most important

How would you feel if someone watched everything that you did online? After the Oklahoma City Bombing in 1996, and the September 11 attacks, the federal government significantly expanded counterterrorism and domestic surveillance law enforcement tools in order to prevent terrorism. In 1996, the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act was passed, which increased domestic surveillance tools by law enforcement. In 2001, the federal government passed the USA PATRIOT act, that expanded the authority and power of the intelligence community and law enforcement in order to respond to domestic and international acts of terrorism. This also created the Department of Homeland Security, that controls all almost all of the government agencies that are responsible for preventing and responding to domestic terrorism. In 2013, Edward Snowden released many classified

The article “Why Edward Snowden is a hero written” by John Cassidy gives more insight on the motives and thoughts on his reveal about the N.S.A. and its mission and responsibilities as a part of the government. Though Edward snowden was looked upon as either a hero or villain due to his actions of informing the citizens of the United states about the N.S.A. and their abilities to tap into anyone’s security, passcodes, and such, he was not constitutionally violating any law. The constitution and privacy laws clearly states that we citizens as individuals have the right to privacy. This alludes to the idea that citizen’s personal information is to be kept safe and protected from the public. Edward Snowden had acted on behalf of the United States citizens and believed the best

Critics of Edward Snowden label him a traitor and a coward. They condemn him for irreparably harming government security operations and setting of a worldwide chain of events that weakened the American position on the world stage. While America now has blight on its records due to the leaks, the topic that should be addressed is should the whistle-blower, the man who uncovered and exposed the questionable and wrong activities, be blamed or should those who allowed the illegal and immoral activities be held accountable for what they started. Edward Snowden had the justification and conviction to do the correct thing and present the incriminating evidence straight to the public. When one takes in consideration everything that Snowden has lost because of his decision, there was little gain for him to make the immoral activities public. Snowden’s crime is breaching the trust of his government contract to expose egregious monitoring by the government on the American public. In an interview conducted by the Washington Post, Snowden speaks out about his goal in releasing the files: “All I wanted was for the public to be able to have a say in how they are governed,”

Edward snowden is no hero hes just a a inmature guy who needs have to have serious consequeces.Edward snowden the man who has leaked alot of the goverments information is still free after 4 years of the incident. “Edward Snowden a 29 year old former CIA employee and curent goverment contractor,has leaked National american information of millions of americans”(June.2013.p1)In this quote it says that Mr snowden leaked millions of americans information,How dare he leak all that Information!,it was all our private stuff and he just leaked like it was nothing.This quote means that he just cant leak all our information he needs to get penalized in page 1 it says that he has flled to hong kong china,they did not even stop him which is really frustrating.This

The fact Snowden chose to leak only information he and his media connections felt would not be detrimental to the public or government, yet would provide enough information that the public as to start an open debate on “big brother” oversight and privacy laws, shows that Snowden was in good faith and conscious leaking information for good and not for personal gains.

“You can't have 100% security and then also have 100% privacy and zero inconvenience. Society had to make choices” said President Obama. It has become a given in society that it is on the government’s agenda to procure its nation’s safety in exchange of the privacy or freedom of the people. Edward Snowden, a paladin of social justice, has now come to light with outstanding facts as for what specifically it is that the National Security Agency (NSA) is able and willing to do for the country’s sake. Snowden, a 29-year-old NSA ex-employee, worked from Hawaii on his computer support for the recollection of data in bulk from the whole nation . Under the name of Verax, which means truth teller in Latin, he

why it was justifiable and how it did in a way enhance democracy in the United States. Snowden

From the movie Snowden I have gained insight into Snowden’s critical thinking. Edward Snowden is a whistle blower who exposed that the American government is spying on people across the world. Edward Snowden has no idea about what he is doing when he first got hired by the CIA until when he was involved with a task he asked to carry out. Edward Snowden was in a tough position when deciding to expose the secret that the American government was spying on the whole world. His life was on the line and his family was on the line. He has to made a decision to give up his good life. In exchange for the values he respected. He feels that there is egalitarianism and prima facie value are being abused by the work he is doing for the American government