From a young age, American students are able to comprehend the idea that our nation’s success tends to center around the equality of the people. History classes have taught us that the less discrimination in this world, the easier a country can succeed. Although the nation continues to fight the war of inequality between its citizens through endless protests and movements, the nation itself has promised equality to all minorities no matter their color or gender. With new laws added to the Bill of Rights, the United States have been able to resolve government issues regarding civil liberties such as freedom of speech, voting regulations and female restrictions that have haunted us from our American past.
Voting, in this day and age, is easily taken for granted by most. When Susan B. Anthony gave her speech in 1873 in the hope of the country bettering their laws to comply with the female population, she knew the nation’s laws complied most with “the white male citizens”(Source E) of the country. Knowing that mistreatment in society was something shared between minorities, Anthony called out the group of people that were treated better than anyone. When speaking to her audience, Anthony uses ethos in her speech in order to make her point clear that withholding women’s civil liberties is wrong. Being a woman in 1873, Anthony faced discrimination in her everyday life; for this reason, she chose to focus on changing not only the country’s social discrimination, but also it’s
Abraham Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation, and the passing of the Thirteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution were historical milestones in which the ever controversial topic of racial equality was first challenged. In theory, these two movements laid the groundwork for a racially equal United States of America. A country in which every member, regardless of skin color, or race were to be treated equally under the eyes of the law and to one day be treated as equals within all realms of society. As historic and powerful as these movements were, they did
Susan B. Anthony, a catalyst for women’s rights in the late 1800’s, drives a speech on Women’s Right to Vote (Fall of 1872) that argues against the oligarchy of sex that denies women their certain inalienable rights. Anthony develops her argument against the establishment by stating her case that she is indeed not guilty of any crime, but exercised her right as an American citizen to vote for our Presidential leader, as well as reciting the preamble of the Federal Constitution to back her argument. The purpose in which is to fight against the laws that hinder her ability as a citizen of the United States of America. Anthony is driving this speech to anyone who will listen, as she says “ Friends and fellow citizens,” and stand with her in the cause for women’s rights.
The writer was indicted for voting because the men gave her no rights. Susan B. Anthony argued that she has a citizen's right to vote with no crime committed because how the constitution was written. The writer’s proved her point by quoting the constitution and dictionaries. Susan B. Anthony used the laws of the land to prove her point that these laws was being used in the country as the main guidelines for the male lawmakers to be broken.The example that best describes this is ” We, the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare” Another piece of evidence “And secure the blessing of liberty to ourselves and our prosperity, do ordain and establish this constitution of the United states of America.”“It is we , the people; not we, the white male citizen, nor yet we, the male citizen; but we the whole person, who form the union”.“Are women persons? And I hardly believe any of our opponents will have the hardihood to say they are not”.
line 34 functions in a similar way in terms that both of them show her intense emotion. As
Susan B. Anthony entered the juryless courtroom. A judge sat before her. Just shortly after she arrived, Anthony said, “I have many things to say. My every right, constitutional, civil, political and judicial has been tramped upon. I have not only had no jury of my peers, but I have had no jury at all” (ecssba.rutgers.edu). Anthony stressed that the laws were not fair only because they were created by men. The courtroom tensed as she made more points clearly proving the judge wrong about the laws made forth in the United States. Susan B. Anthony refused to sit, fearing that it would be her last chance to speak her freedom in the courtroom. The tension was brewing and the judge continued to rebut Anthony’s firm arguments. She made it clear that it was biased laws that were being created against women. Anthony wanted to change that. Her confident statements about her fine for one-hundred dollars because of her decision to vote even though it was against the law, made the courtroom quiet. Many uncomfortably shifted back and forth in their chairs, looking at Anthony’s every movement. Anthony maintained a calm, yet effective speech despite the pressure upon her. She continued to state that it was only wrong of her to vote because she was a woman, and that she was not being treated like a human being as stated in the amendments. Susan B. Anthony, women’s rights fought the injustice. She spent
Why did it take more than 50 years for women to get the same rights as men after Susan B. Anthony gave her speech? After knowing that it took so many years for that happen, people might start thinking that Anthony’s speech was not effective or she wasn’t able to convince women to fight for their rights. No, that wasn’t a reason for the delay and in fact her speech was very effective. It just took a long period of time for congress to pass the bill that would allow women to vote and hold an office. Susan B. Anthony’s speech “On women 's right to suffrage” was very effective because she was very credible, she tried to speak to and support common sense, and she used repetition to send a strong message to her audience.
In Susan B. Anthony’s speech, she reasons that the constitution grants these rights to not just male or white male citizens, but to “the whole people”(Source E) making the purpose of voting to serve as a means to “secure the blessing of liberty”(Source E) for oneself, and Anthony believed everyone should have an opportunity to participate. The pathos emotion in her diction moves the listener to feel what she was feeling, insisting that “women are citizens”(Source E) just like men. Hence, many women and people of color in the U.S. find themselves having to stand up to the authorities or the government to explain that they deserve to exercise the same liberties given to everyone else, sometimes in vain. In her speech, Anthony has to do just that, convince her listeners throughout her speech that she in fact committed no crime at all, but simply “exercised her citizens rights”(Source E). In order to do this, he even went as far as saying that laws that limited women and other minorities voting capabilities was a “violation of the supreme law”(Source E). Moreover, the modern day voting system reflects, under closer inspection, that the power does not truly lie with the people, but only with the representatives elected by the people-- which impedes on the civil liberties of the entire country. Such corrupt systems of government imposing laws limiting the freedom of particular groups further prove that civil liberty
Society has been significantly revolutionized since the beginnings of the United States. The very history of the country has been cursed with racism and the harsh oppression of minorities. In fact, America’s power and economy were founded on a Marxist theory of a two-class system. On the top of that system were the slave owners, and at the very bottom were the slaves themselves (Balkaran, 1999). Slavery and segregation used to be huge components in the lives of Americans. During those times, “Americans” were white, landowning men; obviously that principle has been altered a great deal. People of color, women, and the poor actually have been given suffrage by amendments in the Constitution. Although the United States’ culture and society
Political science is an intermingling of our past United States history and government along with current affairs within the political climate. The Honorable Ray Rickman’s presentation to our Introduction to Political Science class on September, 19th, 2017 was the perfect mix providing information and discussion on past historical beliefs and practices with this theoretical knowledgebase and personal experiences. For many typically college-aged students, issues like racism, gender equality, and equal rights are topics often highlighted in history books and overlooked within the present mundane tasks and cultural happenings. Mr. Rickman discussed the challenges his family faces striving for economic liberty during his youth and the current
Equality is something Americans strive to provide and maintain. It has become an integral and necessary part of our mosaic culture. Even now to the point that when people think of America, they naturally think of freedom and equality. People of many different races, disabilities and creeds have come to the United States seeking the impartiality upon which this country was founded. The institutions of this country have relied upon it, just as it was the created by the events in the laying of moral foundations. The expression of America's citizens plays an extremely significant role in the history of equality in American society. In the pursuit of equality and the "American Dream," people have authored inspiring
Ignorant women are not so ignorant after all. Women in the United States fought for over twenty years, from 1895 to 1915, for women’s suffrage. Women never gave up and showed their strength by overcoming any obstacle that tried to stop them from voting. Anna Howard Shaw was a one of the leaders of the women’s suffrage movement in the United States. On June 21, 1915 Shaw was the voice of the American woman and gave a speech to the men of New York before Election Day in November. In “The Fundamental Principle of a Republic” the rhetorical principles of ethos, anecdote, and hypophora are utilized to persuade the men of New York that women have the right to vote.
America is founded on the belief that all citizens are free to pursue their ambitions regardless of race, color, creed, or national origin. Yet, for the last fifty years, Affirmative Action has created an educational and work environment less focused on equality and more focused on ethnicity. There is no benefit for the United States to enforce Affirmative Action for minorities in educational and employment opportunities and equal treatment, because it promotes reverse discrimination, devalues real accomplishments, and cultivates the minority struggle.
As one of the most ethnically diverse countries on the planet, the United States faces the unique challenge of allowing a multitude of different races, religions, and cultures to live peacefully and prosper every single day. With a revolutionized idea of human rights spreading like wildfire across the world, individuals and groups are standing up to fight for equality in growing numbers. Racial discrimination and oppression have been the ugly past of our country, but it is now all of our responsibilities to guarantee that it is not our legacy. Healing our morally damaged history takes a great deal of time and effort, starting with changes in our government such as new legislature, and finally in our social atmospheres. Already our government has made huge bounds towards equality, beginning with a multitude of laws and amendments that cement the ideals of equality into law. In recent years, establishing that all races have an equal opportunity to hold government office, which culminated with our first black president in 2008. These legislative types of change are easy to recognize and measure; social change, however, is entirely different in nature. It takes time, it’s difficult to force a person to change his or her beliefs. To promote this social change, our country has adopted a set of legal behaviors that are intended to restore the rights of minority groups in our country, but are in effect doing so at the expense of other’s rights. While attempting to fix the unfair
Rosa Parks once said “Racism is still with us. But it is up to us to prepare our children for what they have to meet, and, hopefully, we shall overcome.” Through the constitution, equality in society is an achievable goal. Over time america has become more and more equal. From the abolition of slavery to the right to vote, this country has been heading in a positive direction since the constitution was established. While people are still entitled to their own opinions and discriminate against each other, there is no evidence of discrimination or inequality in the constitution. There are valid reasons for worry about the progression of equality, but it should happen eventually. There is clear possibility for equality showing in the amendments to the constitution, and in our country’s past.
Over time, our past ancestors had to find new ways to overcome challenges that many often are only able to learn about from history books. Some examples of these difficulties would be the abolishment of slavery, the ratification of the 19th amendment, which allowed any American citizen, regardless of gender to vote, and the civil rights movements that went on during the 1960s. Even though our progenitors solved these challenges that haunted our society for hundreds of years, we still have many other problems that need solving. Such as the unjust and biased treatment of students who have a disability, are part of the LGBT community, or are students of color. Ames High School is taking on these challenges by setting a series of rules for