What Is Gandhi's Ethos

In The Essential Gandhi chapter 1, Louis Fischer includes excerpts from Gandhi’s book, The Story of My Experiments. In the excerpts, Gandhi offers a glimpse of his parents’ life and his family tree and describes important events and notable aspects of his childhood and adolescence. Growing up, Gandhi did poorly in school, was very timid and isolated himself. However, eventually, he became more social. One instance that Gandhi stood out from his classmates was when Gandhi misspelled a word that was part of a spelling activity while the British Education Inspector stopped by his high school.

Mahatma Gandhi, a highly influential man, was one of the world’s most well-known fighters for equal rights. Gandhi saw and experienced discrimination, for instance, “At the time Gandhi was there, South Africa was not a friendly place for non-whites. . . . Gandhi believed that this was wrong” (Satyagraha: Gandhi’s Legacy). Gandhi’s interest in human rights was born when he moved to South America and saw the way non-whites were treated. “Satyagraha: Gandhi’s Legacy” states, “Practices of Satyagraha included boycotts, protest marches, and fasts.” Gandhi stood up proud for what he believed in, and because of this he was able to fight for his beliefs. Gandhi did many generous, righteous actions in his lifetime, but the real impact happened after he died, including stimulating Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Nelson Mandela (“Satyagraha: Gandhi's Legacy”). Gandhi inspired others to speak up and change the world forever.

Historians say that Gandhi deserves great credit for pushing the issue of Untouchability onto the national stage and for lending his moral stature to the campaign to abolish it. Yet he never actually renounced the Hindu caste system, and the concrete results of his actions were few. Many Untouchables, particularly the educated ones, would love to knock him off his pedestal. Even the Harijan label (given to those in place of Untouchable) invokes pity rather than respect. (O'Neil, p. 5).

Mahatma Gandhi (the great-souled one) is renowned all over the world for his nonviolent philosophy of passive resistance. Gandhi was praised by the London Times as ‘‘the most influential figure India has produced for generations’’ in the “Mr. Gandhi” article they published in 1948. Gandhi has most notably affected, civil rights movements in three regions of the world; South Africa, America and India.

This truth gave a light of hope that encouraged fearlessness and willpower among the oppressed Indians. This truth had its blades more sharpened than a sword; yet gentle enough for a child to hold. Through civil disobedience Gandhi fought against the evil of violence. Through suffering, he touched the stoniest of hearts. Through humility, he gained compassion.

When we hear the word ‘India’, the first thing that comes to mind is Mahatma Gandhi. The word ‘Mahatma’ is a literal translation to: great sage, a saint, a person to be considered as a messiah (Gandhi, 2011, P4). Descriptions such as freedom fighter, warrior for justice and activist are just three popular terms that describe Mohandas Gandhi today. But are all these descriptions true? Mahatma Gandhi is revered by mainstream opinion as a Jesus like figure. The media and in particular, Richard Attenborough (Gandhi 1982), portray Mohandas as the epitome of perseverance, peace and courage. On the contrary, the film Gandhi, is a shockingly one-sided depiction of the Indian independence movement, which fails to accurately depict history and correctly acknowledge the unnecessary loss of life caused in the process. Evidence today emphatically refute claims of Gandhi’s ‘egalitarian’ and ‘pious’ persona with several historical sources and texts detailing his hypocrisy, stubbornness and blatant perversions of equality.

Gandhi had a very unique way to respond to challenge; he did not fight back so it was very difficult for conflict to rise when gandhi didn’t fight back.This is because he did not provide any fuel to start a fire.This gave gandhi power because people would still attack him and his followers.This looked bad to the public for the british because Gandhi and his followers weren't fighting but the british kept killing them, this started opening many more eyes to what was happening.This is because this showed the injustice that was happening

In the newsreel, Gandhi is presented as a devout leader with many who respect him.

Not only did he provide a strong leader and a beacon of hope for independence and equality in India for his people, but also the South Africans, and the entire world. He also brought peace to many Muslims and Hindus who had been fighting because of their different values, and to people around the world facing similar conflicts. Although some may believe that his assassination was necessary, it was extremely unjust, and based purely on emotion with no real, logical motive. If Gandhi had not been killed, he could’ve continued to make the world a brighter, more peaceful, and equal place for

But through the freedom of India I hope to realize and carry on the mission of the Brotherhood of Man." Gandhi created an Autobiography called “The Story Of My Experiments With Truth” Gandhi did quotes things that really made people think, “An eye for eye only ends up making the whole world blind” This shows us that Gandhi wanted to accomplish things without hurting anyone or acting on things through revenge. Gandhi was one of the biggest influential leaders for many different reason, but one of the biggest changes he has made is how people view the world and themselves.

Gandhi is a biopic produced by Richard Attenborough whose lifelong dream was to make the story of the national independence leader’s life into a movie. The movie starts with Mohandas K. Gandhi, played by actor Ben Kingsley, rejecting all material possessions in pursuit of India’s independence. The storyline plays out to highlight important aspect of Gandhi’s life and ends with his assassination, where he utters the famous lines “Oh god.” Critics claim the movie is over exaggerated, however Attenborough does a fine job of bringing a visual of Gandhi’s life into Western eyes. In addition, what could be a bad thing ends up being a good thing for the layman who watches this movie. Attenborough oversimplifies Gandhi’s perspectives and ideas on social justice and religion, which leads to a very simple explanation of Gandhi’s philosophy.

Aroused by the massacre of Amritsar in 1919, Gandhi devoted his life to gaining India’s independence from Great Britain. As the dominant figure used his persuasive philosophy of non-violent confrontation, he inspired political activists with many persuasions throughout the world (Andrews 23). Not only was Mahatma Gandhi a great peacemaker, but also his work to achieve freedom and equality for all people was greatly acknowledged. Gandhi’s unconventional style of leadership gained him the love of a country and eventually enabled him to lead the independence movement in India.

The accumulating provocation of thirty-two years, culminating in his last pro-Muslim fast, at last goaded me to the conclusion that the existence of Gandhi should be brought to an end immediately. Gandhi had done very well in South Africa to uphold the rights and well being of the Indian community there. But when he finally returned to India he developed a subjective mentality under which he alone was to be the final judge of what was right or wrong. If the country wanted his leadership, it had to accept his infallibility; if it did not, he would stand aloof from the Congress and carry on his own way. Against such an

Mahatma Gandhi once said, “Nonviolence is not a garment to be put on and off at will. Its seat is in the heart, and it must be an inseparable part of our being". The book The Essential Gandhi expresses Gandhi’s views on issues like untouchability, religion, nationality, his movements like civil-disobedience are deeply shown in this book. Readers can learn about Gandhi’s childhood, his early married life, his realization and transition in South Africa, and his ways of approach towards attaining Independence in India. The book did a fantastic job in showing the Gandhi’s principles like non-violence with exemplary contexts.

Gandhi is known for the miraculous things he has done for his people. He put himself through principles that no one else can attest to. His life was truly his message; he utilized the tools he acquired from others and created a life that will benefit his society after him. Gandhi’s quote can be interpreted in many ways, however if the lines in between were read, then the true meaning of the quote will be recognized.