What is it to be convincing? At first, this appears as a simple question, right?
What do you think the answer is? Take a moment before reading on.
The hint we offer is that this is a “practical” question. While it is easy to suggest that the answer to this is merely of “academic” concern, we contend, it is not so simple.
Let’s begin. A few strategies seem to be a reasonable interpretation of the question. First, the question seems too vague and it seems likely there would be an urge to ask for more information. Since we are writing with the awareness of that urge, let us consider two options. That is, it is a general question asking on what grounds will someone be “truly” willing to change their beliefs? Another possibility is to read it
…show more content…
If you are authentically “convinced” after being presented with an argument that is new to you, there is the follow-up question, “is change of beliefs necessary?” The answer to this seems dependent on the second association: the idea of beliefs in connection to the issue of “reality”. After all, at first glance, it is not clear what distinguishes “belief” from “reality”. Change seems necessary if these are interdependent. If not, “belief” and “reality” come into conflict. Many artists play with this second answer. Scientists struggle with both answers. While scientists feel there is no need to believe planets and stars into existence, it is not so clear for the meaning of “stars and stripes”. The significance of this, and other symbols, is dependent on more than the beliefs of individual subjects. Why? Reality is the ultimate question of politics. There are politics to what a subject is, the degree to which a subject can be taken for what it claims to be, and how those claims shape the way people approach social life -- and the worlds those interactions generate, sustain, collapse and reconfigure. In this sense, politics is a short-handed expression for raising concerns about authenticity’s ritualized form: the idea of legitimacy and its conferral of authority and its organization of relations amongst subjects. This tends to invoke the question of justice, and depending on the audience, an answer to whether the idea of morality is involved. At this point, it is clear this
Today, one can see the tactic of persuasion being used as a standard avenue to influence a person’s attitude or beliefs by presenting them with different messages that encourage things like using certain brand name products, vote a certain way, or where to take a vacation just to name a few. There are four types of people that include gullible people, skeptical people, firm believers, and people who are leaders who trust others as well as make others follow their ideas. Persuasion is a widespread topic of social psychology and may be done in different ways. There are two types of cognitive processes by which to persuade someone, which are the central route or the peripheral route. For this assignment I used mostly the central route approach as well as using a little of the peripheral route approach. To reinforce the peripheral route approach the use of pathos was also used during the video to play on the emotions of the watcher. This PowerPoint is effective at using the central route of persuasion, peripheral
To convince someone they have to have changed their beliefs based on evidence or an argument. However in order to persuade someone, a person must urge them to do something or believe something, but once they do go along with it they still don’t believe it to be the best thing. Meaning that the person wasn’t convinced that the other person was right.
Aristotle, Greek philosopher and scientist, argued that there were three ingredients needed to effectively persuade those around you; ethos, pathos, and logos.
Persuasion is accomplished easier when you have established trust, credibility, and respect from the audience you are trying to persuade. Backing those factors with confidence are my primary principals anytime I need to be persuasive. One of the most important factors that influence your persuasive message is credibility, and your ability to persuade will
Gerard A. Hauser covers a plethora of details on how to create a well-made persuasive argument in his book, an Introduction to Rhetorical Theory; however, he covered three specific essentials that are necessary for persuasion: the components logos, pathos and ethos; purposive discourse and rhetorical competence; identification. I will argue for each constituent, respectively, to prove that persuasion cannot thrive without the aforementioned essentials.
Persuading someone could be hard, especially if they are close minded. I know that when persuading someone, I have to know the person whom I am trying to persuade because people are persuaded differently. If I end up not knowing the person, I usually tend to lean toward ethos or pathos. Most people are connected with their emotional side, which is what mode of persuasion I usually use anyways. When I want something and I ask my mom for whatever it is I want. I start off by saying on how it will make my life better, this is the logos mode of persuasion, and seven times out of ten it works because I know who i'm trying to persuade. As I said before if you are trying to persuade someone you have to know who you are talking to. You
As America gets older and travels further and further down the road of time with President Trump the more we-the citizens-find that our new “leader” fears and loathes the press. Trump has often shown his dislike of news outlets no matter their political stance or credibility, at least he treats them the same. Trumps behavior of calling news outlets and journalists names however; is simply childlike, unprofessional, and quite frankly, ridiculous. It is without a doubt that if Trump remains president in the upcoming years the news community will change perhaps even our most basic rights like freedom of press may be wrenched from us and we may be thrown into a totalitarian like government (a centralized government that does not tolerate parties
In the most widely quoted and discussed model of presidential power, Richard Neustadt states that the power of the president lies in the power to persuade. According to Neustadt, the key to presidential success and influence is persuasion. Although some may view the president as a powerful authority figure, the checks and balances established by the founders makes the president’s skills of persuasion crucial.
Napoleon is completely corrupt throughout the entire novel. He never makes a single contribution to anything but himself. He is only interested in his power over the farm and not the farm itself. The only project he is happy about is the training of the puppies and trains them for purely selfish reasons. Napoleon is specifically modeled after the dictator Joseph Stalin. However, Napoleon can more generally represent political tyrants throughout human history and more notably through the twentieth century. Even Napoleons name represents a notorious dictator in Napoleon Bonaparte. The author could have selected any other name in the English language, but he chose to use the name Napoleon. In the way that Orwell writes about this character, it is very easy to sense the bullying and lying behaviors of modern day evil dictators.
(I have talked about early detection, but what if it is too late? What if you are already a victim?)
If the persuaded possesses high elaboration due to high topic relevance, a strong argument will manipulate that variable. If the persuaded has a high need for cognition, this can be exploited to form a strong argument, and so on.
Storytelling: Stories allow people to persuade themselves. A story will lower a prospect’s resistance, make complicated things easier to understand, and perk up their emotions.
According to the text , Social Psychology, “social psychology is the scientific study of how people think about, influence, and relate to one another”(pg. 4) this is viewed in a variety of social topics incorporating group behaviors, attitudes, conformity, obedience to authority, stereotypes and peer pressure. Outside factors can have a positive or negative affect our view of ourselves and each other. These outside factors are used to persuade and influence group behavior. Persuasion is defined as “the process by which a message induces change in beliefs, attitudes, or behaviors” (Myers, 2010, pg. 230). The principles of this process of persuasion according to researchers, Robert Cialdini and Thomas Davidson, are attractiveness and
For example, if I think a type of feed is better than another type of feed, I would have to persuade the buyer in why I think that type of feed us better for their animal. I would have to hive proof of why the feed is better for the animals and why the other isn't better for the animal. According to John Cammack, buying a Europe heifer (a cow that hasn't been bred yet) would help the farmers in the long run. John states what he thinks, what the farmer should so and gives solid proof on why the farmer buying a heifer from Europe would help in productivity, the milk yield, in the dairy cattle (Cammack, 2011). Prestaining people into believing what a student might think is going to be hard. This would be the area I have to work on personally because sometimes I don't say what I think is right, but if I do say what I think is right, I don't have enough information, or proof, to back up what I'm saying is
“If you don’t have anything nice to say, don’t say anything at all” implemented by youth, authorities has limited the right to free speech in schools, in order to “protect” societies generations from reality. However, the limitation of free speech is unjust as it revokes America’s constitutional rights, for with each item we restrict, a piece is worn away from America’s identity. Although it may not seem possible with due time the nation of the United States will transform into the dystopian society children read about in fictional novels. Therefore, the belief to enforce restrictions on the common masses’ voice is to oppress man’s humanity.