“Leonard: Agreed, what’s your point? Sheldon: There’s no point, I just think it’s a good idea for a tee-shirt. [Audience Laugh Track]” (The Big Bang Theory, S01E01) The Big Bang Theory started out as a show depicting four nerdy guys that work at Caltech, at least, that was what it was supposed to be. The quote from above is the first time the audience gets introduced to TBBT. As Sheldon and Leonard walk down the corridor, Sheldon pitches a long and elaborate scientific phenomenon that would go well on a tee-shirt, followed by an audience laugh track. This is the first instance that the directors are setting the tone for the show, or as Steed would put it, “to define in-group and out-group.” (Steed, 5thCircAppeals) The message is clear: If you …show more content…
The Big Bang Theory might not be the most accurate, but it has the idea of being “generally acceptable.” Coming into the ninth season of the show, the premier episode of the series still attracted a staggering 18.20 million viewers, earning 16 percent of all viewership in the same time period (TV By The Numbers.) Even with many of the comments on how the show is an inaccurate representation of the culture, people who has no experience with the actual culture has no basis on what the reality is. With that in mind, the show provides those with no access an introductory idea of the culture. The show regularly dominates the 18-49 target audience, surpassing the other CBS show “Two and a Half Men.” There is no doubt that the show is still very highly regarded as a success and will continue to do so. The problem is that the show is trying to be appealing and as wide ranged as possible for the general audience that’s watching television at the time. The show is made to be explained to as many people as possible, not letting go of any target audiences that might be watching. This target audience can be seen from the demographic that are tracked in the demos. “Factoring out sports, it dominates a wide variety of demographic groups. It’s No. 1 with teens 12–17, adults 18–34, …show more content…
Having a wide range of target audience, the show shows an inaccurate portrayal of the field not only to those in it but with those who knows someone working in it as well. It isn’t uncommon to hear someone asking if a scene in the show happens in life. Sacrificing the accurateness of the show, it shows the scientists always working on something that is unrelated to their fields when they have a scene in their offices, whether it’s using lasers to heat up cup noodles or using lasers to engrave initials onto a spec of sand. While true from time to time, the show is barred from showing scenes for when they are working from a social point of view, it wouldn't be a very interesting scene and wouldn’t convey or connect much to the audience. When looking at television shows in general, it’s important to take things with a grain of salt. Because of the pressures from being appealing to a wide range audience, shows make sacrifices to being accurate for being funny, a factor that viewers look for in a light-hearted comedy sitcom. Now, the real question becomes this: how many people truly understand this is not an accurate representation of real life
Reality shows that are based on teen pregnancy like 16 and Pregnant and Teen Mom sheds light about the troubles on becoming a teen parent, finishing high school and struggling to buy the baby’s need and wants. Lately, these shows are stirring a debate if they are trying to support or avoid teen pregnancy. And this topic is important to the public, because it relates to the young community’s future. Young girls and boys can watch these shows and have different outlooks about having a child. Sometimes, glamorizing teen pregnancy on television might confuse the young community, because they can be fickle at times. They might think it is acceptable to be pregnant so young and others will consider waiting until marriage. Reality shows can either encourage or discourage teen pregnancy based on the individual’s mentality.
Star Trek is a franchise that has been around for a very long time; it has been turned into books, movies and a television series. Television is one of the world 's most influential pieces of propaganda. Whether it is being used to promote the next president, sponsor the newest upcoming athlete, or tell you about your favorite show, television is used to influence the world and how we perceive it. The popular television show aired for the first time in 1966 and throughout the years has seen many important events in its lifetime. Societal issues that were present in Star Trek, such as racism, sexuality, war, and scientific theories, continue to appear in today’s mainstream culture, even decades after the show came to an end.
In conclusion, television wouldn't quite be the television we know today if it had a limited, narrowed genre of only realistic programs. Television is there to attract the viewers with what they want to see. They may want to watch the news, a reality show, a game show, or most recently many have tuned in to watch the Democratic Presidential Debate. Barbara's idea of television is that without reality or things people can do in real life, boredom is ensured to happen. Despite her claim, television continues to play a big part in not only American culture, but multiple cultures around the
Popular television shows aids to heavily influence American audiences, perpetuating, and problematic ideas about homosexuality. Not all mainstream media adheres to traditional social ideas. South Park uses satire to deconstruct heteronormative views on homosexuality. Therefore, homosexuality is accepted more widespread through use of mainstream media.
If you search through your television guide, you will see at least three of these shows on at the same time on different channels, many even having all-day marathons for you to enjoy on Saturday morning. Simon Cole and Rachel Dioso-Villa have analyzed that many of these fictitious programs attempt to make science “sexy,” which may be the reason why we are so attracted to them. The scientists look stylish at all times; wearing nice suits or dresses out on the field or in the laboratory, having normal work days, finding everything they need, having all of the state-of-the-art equipment and staff they need, and more importantly, they get everything done quickly and effectively. This glamorous, action-packed lifestyle gives a false sense of what the career itself actually entails, which includes giant lab coats, numerous court sessions, understaffed laboratories, no gun, and an abundance of paperwork.
In order to fit in to society, some people may modify their own actions based on the perceived reality of the TV show. It is easy to reality TV programs and the way they are perceived, could affect society as a whole.
They also found that the show ‘16 and Pregnant’ led to more searches, tweets and Facebook posts on abortion and birth control…Hopefully educating teens on how not to get pregnant! The question “Could exposure to these media images of pregnant teens and very young new mothers have had an impact on how teens think about pregnancy and ultimately on whether they become teen mothers themselves?” does present itself. The timing of the introduction of ’16 and Pregnant’ could have helped the rapid decline of teen pregnancy over the past few years. An economic study argues that ’16 and pregnant’ may have contributed to one-third of the decline in the 18 months after its release. The researchers also looked to see whether high viewership in certain areas corresponded with a bigger drop in teen births…yes it did! “The results of our analysis indicates their exposure to ’16 and pregnant’ was high and that it had an influence on teens thinking, regarding birth control and abortion” the researchers write. That’s all well and scientific, but could a television show really have that big of an impact on teen birth rates? “It’s an extraordinary study done by two very cautious economists” said Bill Albert, chief programme officer at the national campaign to prevent teen and unplanned pregnancy. While the researchers said they did a lot of” fancy economic work” to make sure their conclusion was one hundred percent accurate, the most compelling evidence came from the teens social media. The researcher had quoted some of findings to CNN. “This reminds me to take my birth control” and “watching sixteen and pregnant, going to take my birth control”, she said she had remembered reading…of course no one is crediting MTV alone for the declining teen birth rate, “About half of the recent dramatic decline can be attributed to the recession” the researcher said.
After conducting an hour-long observation and data collection of The Big Bang Theory, I found three specific patterns. These were patterns of traditional gender roles, heterosexual privilege, and gender performance. The first pattern is the traditional breadwinner and housewife roles that are portrayed throughout the episodes. In the show women are seen occupying the household while the men occupy the workplace. These traditional roles reinforce gendered behaviors and interactions amongst the male and female character that reflect modern day society.
Also, in many cases, the characters used in these shows are not ordinary individuals, but highly paid actors that simply recite scripts. Clearly, these shows are inaccurately labeled as “reality television,” and many individual’s time is wasted as a result. Time for many is very valuable. Wasting a person’s time because of an inaccurate description could be just as detrimental as wasting a person’s money because of an inaccurate description. Many people watch these shows to view real life situations, but what they are really viewing is the complete opposite. This cultivates confusion about what is real and what is fake.
But, modern society has taken nerd culture and appropriated it to be seen as something cool and trendy. Popular culture has adapted and appropriated nerd culture. Super-hero movies, and television have taken nerd culture into a status were it is the popular culture. The Big Bang Theory is a prime example of nerd culture being appropriated by pop media. The actors in the show play nerds when they are not necessarily ones, and they popularize the culture in which they are appropriating. A similar situation would be Weird Al’ Yankovic; he is a musician who parodies music by popular artists and makes the original music into something comical. This is apparent by the music video White & Nerdy in which he is appropriating nerds and their culture. Influences such as these have caused the popularity of nerd culture to become a widespread phenomenon. The appropriation of nerd culture by modern mainstream culture has removed the negative appeal of nerd culture; thus, having a positive affect which nerd culture more enticing to individuals.
Reality programs have dominated television networks since their rise in popularity began in the early 1990s with MTV’s The Real World. The reality genre quickly gained viewership as it redefined the formulaic set up of televisions shows from the past. Reality television has infiltrated television because networks prefer low budgets for their programs that also generate high ratings (Hasinoff, 2008). People watch reality shows because they are intrigued by the seemingly “real” drama with ordinary people as characters (Dubrofsky, 2006). Now at its peak of growth, reality television evokes ideas of social order and cultural norms to its audiences, while perpetuating racial stereotypes in society (Mendible, 2004). My purpose of the review of
One of the most successful and popular comedies on television in the 21st century is “Big Bang Theory “. From the beginning, this show “Big Bang Theory “, main characters of this show are four boys Leonard, Sheldon, Raj and Howard and one girl Penny. This show bases itself entirely on stereotypes which historically the boys are
Dr. Malcolm Sayer is a dedicated and caring physician at a hospital in the Bronx. After working with the catatonic patients who survived many years, he discover a stimuli that can make a specific patient responsive, like hearing familiar music, catching a ball, and human touch can have an effect on specific patients to response again. Leonard Lowe, at first was the only one without a specific stimuli to make him responsive, then Sayer discovers that he can talk to him using an Ouija board. After the lecture about L-dopa he attended, Sayer believes that this may help his patients. He first tried it to Leonard and came to a successful result: Leonard was finally awaken from his disease, Leonard completely awakens from his catatonic state. This
The cultivation perspective which, was developed by George Gerber and Larry Gross states that the more time people spend living in the television world the more likely they are to believe social reality portrayed on television. With the advances in technology, television still continues to dominate children’s interests, on average youth spend about 4.29 hours watching television per day. Other forms of electrical devices such as ipads, laptops, and cellular phones make it easier for children to watch their favorite programs on to go. I have chosen to analyze an episode of “Family Guy”, which is a cartoon television show which is intended for adult audiences. The show is based on the Griffin family, which consists of a mother Louis, father Peter, teenaged children Chris and Meg, a talking
Can T.V. shows be the reflection of our society or influence the behavior of the members of our community? Since 1936 when television broadcasting begin, it priority was to inform and to entertain our society; subsequently, a massive amount of rules and regulations were created to control the material presented in TV, which principal goal was to safeguard the moral and ethical standards of it time. Nevertheless, from its beginning to the present home entertainment television standards contents have change; likewise, the moral an ethics values of our society have change and continuing changing from generation to generation. TV shows from the 50’s, 80’s, and the present exposed many changes in the way human role are exposed, the language