What Is Nurture Over Nature

1. Some people have argued that the Johns Hopkins psychologist used this opportunity as an experiment to test his nurture theory of gender identity. What are the expected results of this experiment, assuming that the nurture theory is valid?

What determines who you are or what you will become? The debate between nature versus nurture is trying to figure this out. According to “Essentials of Psychology”, Jeffrey S. Nevid (2012) Nature versus nurture is the debate about how genetics and nature determine our behavior. In other words, have your attitude, behavior and health problems developed because of how you were raised or who you came from. It is a debate that has stumped psychologists for centuries. The study of twins, both identical and fraternal, have made it easier for psychologists to figure out this debate. So what is the answer to this age old debate; Nature or Nurture?

Erickson’s psychosocial theory adds perspective to why identical twins, Linda and Lydia, turned out differently (Feldman 2010). Linda was raised by a family in the rural west, while Lydia went to a family in the urban south. These are two very different situations filled with different socioeconomical environments (Feldman 2010). The differences in the girls’ social environment could have had huge influence on their cognitive development (Feldman 2010). We need to analyze what Erickson’s psychosocial theory says about the way our social interactions with other people can test and outline our development (Feldman 2010). We can also take a look at the

Susan Evers and Sharon McKendrick, the famous identical twins from the movie The Parent Trap, were separated at a young age by their divorcing parents. Sharon grew up in Boston to a socialite mother while Susan grew up in California on her father’s ranch. Sharon had structure while Susan’s life was very laid back. They looked the same and liked many of the same things, yet their personalities were very different. What is responsible for these differences? Is it simply that they are two different people with different interests and preferences? Or did the environments that they grew up in play a part in making who they are? In the nature vs. nurture controversy, nature proclaims that our genetic make-up plays the primary role in human

The nature versus nurture debate is said to be one of the oldest, longstanding debates within psychology. This debate really sparks the interests of researching whether it is soley by nature (our genes or hereditary factors) or by nurture (our enivornment, relationships, teachings) that we become who we are or what influences us most.

of “self and mind [being] social products” Henslin, J.M. (2013). I started to and now

Introduction As part of this assignment the writer will examine evidence that human behaviour is driven by our biology. It is important to consider social and cultural influences as evidence against the biological perspective in shaping human behaviour. It is well known that both biological and socio-cultural factors play a role in how humans behave so it is important to consider the interplay between both perspectives. This is what is known as The Nature vs Nurture debate in psychology and this is what the writer will focus on for the purpose of this assignment.

In many social fields the discussion of nature vs. nurture is a common theme. However, in recent discussions it is being found to be too simplistic. This argument is being rejected for two claims, according to Brian Garvey, the stronger claim states that it is possible to attribute a trait wholly to the influence of genes or wholly to the influence of the environment (Garvey, 2005). While the weaker claim states that it is possible to talk of traits more or less under the control of genes or environment. Garvey explains that both of these claims are rejected, “because it makes no sense to talk of a trait as more the product of genes than of environment (Garvey, 2005).” Since the nature vs. nurture theory deals with the stronger of the two claims,

The opinion paper was the first paper that I wrote in composition ll. I connected my opinion paper with the communication skills with my mother. Through writing this paper I learned that stating my opinion is fine, as long as I have evidence to back it up. Communicating your opinion with other can be hard when the other person you’re trying to communicate with has a different opinion than you do on that topic. My mother and I quite frequently have different opinions, but learning as I grow up that even if I have a different opinion than her it doesn’t mean we can’t get along. I could have written about anything that I possibly wanted. I choose to write about nature verse nurture. The title of my paper is Nature Vs. Nurture and it is a paper

Nature is the genes a person is born with, nurture is how a person is raised, we either inherit it from our parents (genetics) or we learn it from our upbringing (environment). The textbook describes the clarification of nature vs nurture as making a decision, is it “the level of the individual or at the level of the individual differences within a population” (Page 163). If it is the level of the individual then there is no debate of what it is because each person has a unique set of genes. If it is at the level of the individual differences of a population then you can compare differences of genes and environment page 163. For example, if you take a population of a village living on the Yukon River, most of them probably harvest and eat salmon.

The nature-nurture debate has been around for decades. It is one of the oldest and most popular topics in the history of psychology asking what makes people who they become and how they behave and develop the way they do. What makes the debate more interesting is that now scientists are asking if personality traits and even sexual orientation can be determined by what is in already there from conception. Bodies are built up of chromosomes which contain genetic information. Many of these are inherited from parents and relatives. The nature side of the debate states the way people are is predominantly from inherited genetics and other biological factors not so much the environmental factors. The genes humans have in their bodies play a huge role to many aspects of who they are and who they become. For example, hair colour, eye colour and height are all predetermined by genes. Unchangeable. This is natures way. The argument stands to decide whether most attributes do stem from nature, genes, or if they can be affected by the environment and the way people are nurtured as they have grown. The nurture side of the argument believes although humans do have the genes and traits with which they are born, most personality traits are being made up of environmental factors. For example, being loved and cared for as children, if parents or carers were positive role models and if those people were taught in ways which provided them with discipline and respect for others. Where nature

The significance of nature and nurture pertaining to the personal development of humans is constantly in debate, but there is much more scientific evidence to support the significance of nature. Experiments and studies proving that gender identity, sexual preference, and the way people behave are exclusively decided through genetics and natural hormones. Nurture elements, such as the media, family, and peers have an insignificant effect on how a person identifies with a gender, has a sex preference, or behaves. The research speaks for itself- nature is more impactful on the personal development of people.

In the twentieth century, where we are now, there is also a different approach to the nature vs. nurture debate then there was before. In the twentieth century it has came to a realization that for this debate there is not going to be a yes or no or right or wrong answer. Many people believe different things. For example, there may be or there may not be a stable or valid human nature. There is a variety in what people believe. With nurture, depending on where an individual grows up, there may be a lot of different assumptions and practices. People in this century do not think nature and nurture are two completely separable things. They believe they work together and the intelligence is

Throughout time, nature and nurture have been examined to be two of the most essential topics to which the human was developed. However, the troublesome question that is asked is whether or not one has a more critical impact on human development. Before one can conclude if either is the key component of human development, one must first understand what both nature and nurture establish. While nature is characterized as the genetic makeup of a person through the inherited traits of one’s parents, nurture confronts the perception that adapting and changing to fit certain environmental factors form humans. Many theorists have brought into consideration their theories to demonstrate which approach resolves the question. Unfortunately, there is

Millions of children start new lives every day. The process of their development has always been of question to us; we are completely unaware of the exact processes that they go through. Human psychologist continue to ponder the dispute of whether the factors that structure a human are biological or circumstantial. Several contradicting theories have been made about the nature versus nurture discussion. Through personal experience and being an older sibling, I am able to clearly analyze and make my own conclusions. I believe that nurture is the dominating force compared to nature.