Sociologist Emile Durkheim defines organic solidarity in an industrial society as a social order based around an acceptance of economic and social differences. He explains that division of labor becomes so specialized that everyone is doing something different (Kierns, p. 80). In other words, organic solidarity is based on the dependence people have on other people in a more advanced society. Nowadays, everyone performs different tasks and specialize in a vast variety of things. Although individuals specialize in many different things and have different values and interest, both contributions are important to society creating a social solidarity.
In a mechanical solidarity community, it is a small close-knit society where everyone performs the same job, and live the same lives. A 2011 internet article noted that just because people do not have the same interests, perform the same tasks, and have the exact same perspectives on life, that society is not failing. Durkheim states that this is the formation of organic solidarity. In organic solidarity, everyone in society plays a different
…show more content…
(n.d.). Retrieved September 26, 2016, from https://www.britannica.com/topic/Gemeinschaft-and-Gesellschaft
Keirns, N. J., Strayer, E., Griffiths, H., Cody-Rydzewski, S., Scaramuzzo, G., Sadler, T., . . . Jones, F. (n.d.). Introduction to sociology 2e.
Mechanical and Organic Solidarity. (2011, March 16). Retrieved September 26, 2016, from https://sitwe.wordpress.com/2011/03/16/mechanical-and-organic-solidarity/ R. (2009, February 5). Mechanical versus Organic Solidarity and their Appearance in Public High School. Retrieved September 26, 2016, from http://theoryrocks101b.blogspot.com/2009/02/mechanical-versus-organic-solidarity.html Raskoff, B. S. (2009, November 19). Everyday Sociology Blog. Retrieved September 26, 2016, from
Chapter six brings a different approach at introducing the importance of sociology. This chapter, focuses upon the historical significance of American sociology as society knows of it today. It discusses many different aspects of sociology, but it intentionally focuses on these important aspects that include: “The Chicago school”, sociologists whom attributed to American sociology, and the rise of female sociologists. These three fundamentals establish the overall history of American sociology.
Durkheim argued that society needed a sense of solidarity, that is, its individual members must feel that they are part of a single group or community, reinforcing this statement with how social life and co-operation would be impossible without social solidarity as each individual would pursue their own selfish desires instead of working together to reach an agreement on important things. In his eyes the education system helped to create solidarity by transmitting society’s culture, shared beliefs and values from one generation to the next. For example, he argues that if a country’s history was taught, a sense of shared heritage and a commitment to wider social groups would be gradually established or instilled in the minds of children.
Bibliography PageJames M Henslin. Sociology: A Down-to-Earth Approach, Core Concepts (3rd Edition). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon, 2008.
Henslin, J.M. (2010). Sociology: A down-to-earth approach (4th ed.). . Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
With modernization and industrialization, labour became increasingly specialized. Before this in the pre- modern societies, all workers did almost the same work in order to sustain themselves. These workers shared social cohesion base on similarity and commonality among themselves. This ‘mechanical solidarity’ was soon replaced by ‘organic solidarity’. With organic solidarity social cohesion was based on each individual’s dependence on every other in the society for survival. (The Emile Durkheim Archive, Solidarity)
Kendall, Diana Elizabeth. Sociology in our times: the essentials. 10th ed., Boston, MA, USA, Cengage Learning, 2016.
Bessant, J. and R. Watts. 2002. Sociology Australia. Second Edition. Crows Nest: Allen and Unwin.
His views can be divided into three different theories; the form of solidarity, Anomie, and the division of labor. Durkheim explained that there are two different types of the social integration; which is mechanical and organic solidarity. He explained that the mechanical solidarity forms a group or community where people affiliate and feel the comfort by regulated by the shared rules and the systems of beliefs, which is we call common conscience. The mechanical solidarity has a strong social morality compare to organic solidarity. The organic solidarity is more like an opposite theory of mechanical solidarity. The organic solidarity is the society that is more focused on individual’s values, performance in different tasks, and form a society that has less social morality with less common conscience. Durkheim explained, as a society grows up, the division of labor increases and become powerful. The mechanical and organic solidarity must exist in our society to keep the balance between the inequality and equality. But at the same time, it also makes big distance between the high class and working class and it is causing working class to feel devastated because of the differences of advantages and disadvantages between the high class and working
(Schaefer R 2011 Sociology: A Brief Introduction)Schaefer, R. (2011). _Sociology: A Brief Introduction_. (9th ed) New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Henslin, J. (2011). Essentials of Sociology: A Down To Earth Approach. Boston, MA: Allyn &
2. Durkheim: What term does Durkheim associate with social solidarity? How do societies achieve it organically and mechanically? What did he think threatened social solidarity?
Organic solidarity arose as a result of the industrial revolution when society became more multifaceted and new ways of working emerged. This saw a decline in the collective conscience regarding shared morals and beliefs as society began to progress and expand. The division of labour that arises as a result of organic solidarity is complex and varied, resulting in people becoming more individualistic and yet also interdependent. Society’s social bonds now centred around the fact that people were dependant on each other for the good and services required in their day-to-day lives. (McDonald, 2009)
Henslin, J, Possamai, A & Possamai-Inesedy, A 2011, Sociology: A down-to-earth approach, Pearson, Frenchs Forest NSW.
Kendall, Diane, Jane Lothian Murray, Rick Linden. Sociology in Our Times. Scarborough, Ontario: Thomson Canada Limited, 2004.
Van Krieken R, Smith P, Habibis D, Mcdonald K, Haralambos M, Holborn M, Sociology Themes and Perspe