What Is Organisational Commitment And Why It Is Important?

“Organizationally committed employees will usually have good attendance records, demonstrate a willing adherence to company policies and have lower turnover rates. In particular, their broader base of job knowledge and high level of customer service often translates to into loyal customers who buys more form them, Making referrals resulting in new customer and even pay a premium price.”

Organizational commitment is defined as “An employee who identifies with a particular organization and its goals and wishes to stay a member” (Robbins & Judge 38). Nan Capp has worked for Bumble Bee for the past four years. She has more experience which correlates to weaker organizational commitment. Throughout the book, she mentions wanting to quit more than a few times. However, because

Meyer and Allen (1997) propound normative commitment as “a feeling of obligation to continue employment”. Many organisations build a work culture with internalised norms, values, beliefs and obligations. To a certain extent these internalised norms makes employees normatively committed so that they become obliged to stay in the organisation rather than leaving. Naturally these internalised norms and values creates a feeling of obligation in employees and they think that they are ought to stay in organisation. Wiener and Vardi (1980) have described normative commitment as “the work behaviour of individuals, guided by a sense of duty, obligation and loyalty towards the organisation”. The institutions working in mental healthcare services can impart certain genuine internalised norms and obligations to their work culture. Once the employees get moulded with these norms and values they become normally committed to the organisation and feel obliged to remain in the organisation whereby mentally ill persons can utilise their treatment

Dr. Heidi Reeder defines commitment as the experience of being psychologically attached to something and intending to continue. She explains that there are four factors that predict our commitment to a relationship, job, goal, etc. The first two are treasures and troubles, which is pretty much the pros and cons of what the commitment brings. The next one is contribution, which is how much do you have invested in this commitment.The last factor is choices, like the amount of options you have is going to make you more or less likely to commit. The equation that dictates the level of commitment we have is treasures - troubles + contributions - choices = commitment because many pros and a lot of investment without too many options will make it

There are three separate dimensions to organizational commitment: 1. Affective commitment is an emotional attachment to the organization and a belief in its values. For example, a Petco employee may be affectively committed to the company because of its involvement with animals. 2. Continuance commitment is the perceived economic value of remaining with an organization. An employee may be committed to an employer because she is paid well and feels it would hurt her family to quit. 3. Normative commitment is an obligation to remain with the organization for moral or ethical reasons. An employee spearheading a new initiative may remain with an employer because he feels he would “leave the employer in the lurch” if he left." (Robbins & Judge, 2011, p 77)

Allen, N. J. (2007). Organizational commitment. In S. G. Rogelberg (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Industrial and

Commitment as a group is important, as it gives all members inclusive a shared sense of goal and achievement at the end of the task. Therefore as a group, we will be organised with our work making sure each and have a shared responsibility of committing to the group through getting involved with group discussions and contributions. On a whole as a group in order for us to be committed to work we need to have a collective set of ideology and knowledge of the task and the end goal. This can only be achieved if we all, work hard, collaborate with each other and

Human beings feel committed to their work in the organization if they develop belongingness with it.

Organizational commitment is one of the two individual outcomes derived from individual mechanisms like job satisfaction, stress, motivation, trust, justice, ethics, and learning and decision making. These mechanisms and outcomes can be found on the integrative model of organizational behavior (OB). Colquitt, LePine, and Wesson defined organizational commitment in their Organizational Behavior 5th Edition book as the desire of an employee to remain a member of the organization (p 64).

Different leadership organisations have different leadership styles that they have adopted in their operations. However it is up to an organization to make sure that the leadership style it uses contributes to the commitment of different stakeholders in an organization. Organizational commitment is one of the salient on going organizational issues faced by managers. Past literature has highlighted the importance of retaining committed employees as an aspect of survival for organization hence many forward thinking are striving to create a positive organizational climate in order to keep those good employees through various human resource initiative (Chew, J, &

Many may argue that job satisfaction and organizational commitment are the same, but they are actually different.

Commitment is more than a promise to do or give something. It is the state or quality of being dedicated and maintaining an attitude of someone who works extremely hard to do or support something. Commitment not only requires full attention, but also requires diversity. A person who processes the quality of commitment should be very responsible and well-rounded. I believe I am a person who represents this unique quality by processing patriotism, willingness to place service above self, ability to set goals and achieve them, friendliness and helpfulness, diverse interests, strong work ethic, confidence and leadership, and a strong sense of humor.

Organizational commitment is critical to organizations due to the desire to retain a strong workforce. Organizations want to know why employees stay or leave their organizations so if correction is needed they have some tools to proceed with the correction. High turnover of employees in an organization can determine if an organization is successful or not. While turnover is related to all three areas of commitment researchers have determined that Affective commitment is one most associated with absenteeism and organizational citizenship (Williams J. 2004).

Personal characteristics of workers also has an impact on job satisfaction. Job satisfaction increases age. Whites have greater job satisfaction than non-whites. The level of education is slightly negatively related to job satisfaction. If personal skills and abilities are not required by a job, job satisfaction decreases. When a person is more adjusted personally, they will be more satisfied with work. Most of all having a job with decent and fair wage may be the most important variable to job satisfaction. High job satisfaction is associated with low turnover and low absenteeism and with high commitment. Although the evidence is not conclusive, high job satisfaction is associated with high performance and prosocial behaviors.

Job satisfaction is the very important factor in general quality of life because it is closely connected with working life (e.g. Argyle, 1989; Bang & Lee, 2006), with family life, everyday life, and mental health (Orpen, 1978; Schmitt and Bedeian, 1982; Faragher, Cass & Cooper, 2005). Level of job satisfaction is also highly related to turnover, absenteeism rate, work productivity or accomplishment (Muchinsky, 1977; Organ, 1977). Many researchers (e.g. Cherrington, 1994; Acorn, Ratner & Crawford, 1997; Ostroff, 1992; Spector, 1997) state that employees who experience high job satisfaction contribute to organisational commitment, job involvement, their physical, mental health and overall well-being are improved. Job dissatisfaction on the