What Is Parent-Offspring Conflict?

Love is unique in its striking ability to be a driving force in dictating interpersonal relationships. It patterns behavior and orients individuals towards their distinct, unique attractions. According to Velleman, love penetrates deeper than one’s qualities; it extends to one’s rational will, or the essence of a person. To him, though love appears to have particularity, it is also a moral emotion. Kolodny subscribes to the relationship theory, asserting that an ongoing, interpersonal, and historical relationship with a relative is a part of the reason for love. In Kolodny’s view, the existence of the true self is irrelevant, as is the morality of love. Both Velleman and Kolodny disprove the quality theory; however, their perceptions of love and its morality differ. I believe that Kolodny is correct in his view that morality is irrelevant to love and that there must be factual reasons for love. Although it is enticing to believe that one is attracted to the essence of another, the essence is not motivation enough for love. The relationship theory takes into account the motivation needed to love a particular person from a historical, interpersonal, and ongoing perspective.

In “Love: The Right Chemistry”, author Anastasia Toufexis discusses the philosophy of love in a more technical manner, by expressing it through scientific knowledge. She argues that, “Love rests firmly on the foundations of evolution, biology, and chemistry.” Toufexis

In the movie Casablanca, directed by Michael Curtiz, two different kinds of love are exposed. The love relationship between Ilsa Lund and Rick is a more passionate relationship while the one between Ilsa and Victor Laszlo is more intimate. Love is composed of different feelings and because of that it can be expressed, as seen in Casablanca, in different ways. “The Intimate Relationship Mind”, a text by Garth J. O. Fletcher and Megan Stenswick, helps support that claim providing a scientific background on how love is shaped by those different feelings. It says that “love is composed of three distinct and basic components that each represent evolved adaptations; namely, intimacy, commitment,

The article '' love: the right chemistry'' by Anastasia Toufexis efforts to explain the concept of love from a scientific aspect in which an amateur will understand. Briefly this essay explains and describe in a scientific way how people's stimulation of the body works when you're falling in love. The new scientific researches have given the answer through human physiology how genes behave when your feelings for example get swept away. The justification for this is explained by how the brain gets flooded by chemicals. The author expresses in one point that love isn't just a nonsense behavior nor a feeling that exhibits similar properties as of a narcotic drug. This is brought about by an organized chemical chain who controls different

In his article “Watching New Love as It Sears the Brain,” Benedict Carey expresses that love is not necessarily an emotion but rather a neurological and physical phenomenon. After comparing new love to mania and obsession, Carey offers evidence of romantic love as a neuropsychological event through the description of the caudate nucleus (a specific part of the brain which produces the neurotransmitter dopamine), explaining the cause of desire and passion in relation to love.

The human idea of love is quite possibly the most misunderstood in today’s society. Love can be between a man and woman, mother/father and their kids, or even really good friends. However, these relationships of love go through many interactions and stages to start and progress. Many psychological events must occur and be worked through in order to be successful. All relationships must endure the five perspectives of human behavior. These perspectives are biological, learning, social and cultural, cognitive, and psychodynamic influences.

The original study “The nature of love” was focused on gaining more understanding of human development (Hock, 2013). It involved a series of experiments done by Harry Harlow in 1958, in which he

Love exists in the short story “The Bear Came Over the Mountain” by Alice Munro and in the short story “What We Talk About When We Talk About Love” by Raymond Carver. in Munro’s short story the plot is that of a mentally ill wife, Fiona, who falls in love with another patient while her husband still tries to hang on to their old love. Her husband eventually wants to have an affair with the wife of the man his wife is having an affair with. Their love changed because of their circumstances due to ill health. Carver’s story discusses the different definitions of love due to the type and quality of relationships; everyone has a different definition. Love also exists all over the world within different environments and cultures. The concept of love depends upon the environment in which it inhabits. Love is dependent on the life of the people in love and it also depends on their current environment. Nature and nurture are also huge factors into the development and process of love. What nature and nurture mean is whether it is due to how the person lives and acts along with their personality compared to whether it’s all in their genetics beforehand. Love is more on the nurture side instead of the nature side of human experience.

In this article from Time magazine entitled “Crazy Love”, the author Steven Pinker, discusses the implications of falling in love, the extent of its effect on human beings, and the methodology of people’s endeavors to find potential spouses. The author argues that experiencing love has the power to drive humans to take actions that under rational circumstances, they would likely not partake in. Pinker asserts that the symptoms of romantic infatuation are “different from both raw lust and the enduring commitment that keeps lovers together.” That we as human beings should all know the symptoms: the idealization of our significant others, massive mood swings that vary from ecstasy to despair, the inability to eat or sleep, and the “intense need for signs of reciprocated feelings.” He

In the excerpt from “Love 2.0” by Barbara Fredrickson, the feeling of love is explained to be more biological in nature. Love is often seen as an intense emotion that connects two or more people through trust and communication. It can click into place after a lengthy conversation or just a shared glance. While this may seem dramatic, Fredrickson offers her own biological perspective to explain these phenomena in a more grounded sense. These biological reasonings aide her in proving that love is not unconditional or exclusive, but rather shared with all that give off a positive resonance. It is also made possible through the synchronized flow of the two people’s brains, the release of the hormone, oxytocin, and the healthy control of the vagal. The combination of these parts enables a person to experience this feeling of love and receive it from others as well. It is important to understand these scientific reasonings because they show how people can obtain this deep love with multiple people by just listening to their bodies. The different biological processes enable people to love better by creating a deeper connection in conversation, a strong sense of trust, and providing the skills people need to acquire the love their bodies crave.

in neuroscience, love is much stronger than a basic emotion or state of mind. Emotionally, it means thinking obsessively and repeatedly about the beloved. This takes up around 85% of waking time. The person’s own priorities change and there is a continual, compulsive desire for closeness. Anxiety and fear are reduced, and risk-taking is made easier. A feeling of ecstatic, euphoric happiness takes over the person, and he or she is ready to die for the beloved. (Sultan, 2012, p. 746).

Love is something that can be explained a thousand different ways with a thousand different ideas. And yet, there is not a single, correct way to understand and identify how to love. Robert Solomon, in his writing, “About Love,” talks about the foundation of love as being built between two people through a single identity that grows stronger as their love solidifies. In the writing “The Second Sex,” Simone Beauvoir gives a totally different account of how love needs to have mutual independence and respect from both sides in order to be authentic.

Love is a unique aspect of the human condition that does not seem to exist in any other lifeform. In spite of this, like many other traits that stem from evolution, it is likely that love is a product of that process as well. Regardless of whether it is subconscious or not, romantic and familial love seem to go hand in hand as people tend to seek qualities that may benefit a future family. It can be argued that the sensation felt by a large majority of the population, love, can be attributed to the selfish genes that inhabit the body. For the sake of argument, love can be described as the relationship between people and their concern for each other. Dawkins introduces processes like kin selection, mating strategies, and reciprocal altruism which may play a role in both romantic and familial love. To summarize these processes: kin selection is when an organism risks their own well-being for a relative to increase the likelihood of gene replication, mating strategies describe the methods in which an organism uses to attract a mate, and reciprocal altruism is acting in a manner that temporarily reduces one’s well-being with the assumption that the apparent act of altruism will be reciprocated.

Fisher projected that humankind has advanced three core brain systems for mating and reproduction: lust which is the sex drive or libido, also labeled as borogodó. Attraction the early stage penetrating romantic love. And last but not least attachment which involves very deep feelings with a time-consuming partner. Love can begin and start off with any of those three feelings, lust attraction, attachment, Fisher says. Some people can go out and have sex with someone they don’t even know also know as a one night stand and end up falling in love or catching some sort of feelings. Other’s can meet someone new and get to know them and finaly have sex. Some can feel attachment towards someone which will end up turning it into romantic relationship which leads to sex. But the sex Some people have sex with someone new and then fall in love. Some fall in love first, and then have sex. Some feel a deep feeling of attachment to another, which then turns into romance and the sex

One cliche´ has driven me to this stance - pheromones. The possibility that there had never been any “real” chemistry between us. This is a point when man and woman first meet and exchange their biological information in some non-philosophical way and decide whether they are in love or “in friendship.’’ An arguable question might appear here – what if one out of two feels that “call of pheromones’’ and another one does not? Is it a “biological program’s’’ breakdown or rather a mental one? We are lying to other people and fooling ourselves saying that we love someone in this case. Otherwise, the mechanism of compatibility would mutually recognize the “right’’ signals