Pay For Performance Essay

The policy issue that I have selected to discuss herein is the pay-for-performance payment model. I feel that this impacts a large number of our population and changes in this regard should be made. This type of payment model aims to use reimbursement to incentivize providers to deliver high quality services. Pay-for-performance model steps away from the traditional manner of reimbursement of fee-for-service, in which providers receive payment on the basis of frequency or volume of the services they provide regardless of outcomes. In contrast,

“Patient satisfaction is undoubtedly on the minds of hospital administrators in an increasingly consumer-driven healthcare system. With patient

Patient satisfaction: This issue can affect funding, revenue and reimbursement from insurance providers. Patient satisfaction can be affected by nearly any aspect of the hospital experience, surveys are done randomly to gain insight on the patients overall treatment at the facility. Negative feedback can cause assumptions about treatment and quality by the HCO as well as decrease in incoming patients.

The pay-for-performance program will take health care from basic health care delivery to high-quality health care delivery. The way that this is going to affect the patient "customer" is because they are going to have an overall better experience with more attention to their overall health. The patient will also see benefits because there are incentives for patients when they live a healthy lifestyle. One of the incentives that the patient will see is in cost savings in the immediate future. Pay-for-performance is positive for all stakeholders involved within the program because it delivers on the main goal which is to increase the quality of care to patients while reducing the costs.

Pay-for-performance plans are formal compensation systems that are directly related to organizational or individual performance. The United States Department of Labor defined pay-for-performance as a raise in pay based on a set of criteria put in place by employers, and notes that the Fair Labor Standards Act,

The service-based pay structure provides significant motivation for healthcare providers to deliver as many services as possible, with little to no consideration of patient outcomes. Furthermore, this structure provides no incentive for certain key elements of healthcare such as patient education and care coordination, both of which have led to diminished costs and better outcomes for patients. I am of the opinion that very little quality improvement will take place if this pay-for-service model persists. The current transition from service-based pay to quality-based pay is definitely a move in the right

Besides, the financial incentives for hospitals and physicians that belong to ACOs, Jaffery & Golden 2013, asked and then answered the question “why would providers join this program? One reason is to prepare for the future”. Fee-for-service reimbursement, which has been how hospitals get paid for their services rely solely on the volume of patient seen without taking into consideration the quality of care provided. Payers today, such as government, commercial insurers, employers, and individual consumers are now requesting on value -based-payment, which consist of delivering the highest level of care at a lower cost. The volume based system even though the traditional way of how payments are made is not a viable long-term option (Jaffery and Golden, 2013, p.98).

Any proposed policy to improve healthcare must address the current payment method, and the rising cost of healthcare. The common reimbursement method for healthcare services is the fee-for-service payment model. It requires providers to figure-out all incurred costs to render services for patients. Additionally, providers need to determine what is the insurer proposing to pay, which thought to reward quantity over quality. An alternative to this model is using a bundle

Since 1992, health cares like Medicare have reimbursed physicians on a fee-for-service basis that weighs their service and expenses and then converts the weights to money (Wilensky, 8). According to Gail Wilensky, “Congress replaced an existing spending constraint with the Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR) to reduce reimbursements if overall physician spending exceeded the growth in the economy” (Wilensky, 8). Physicians and PAs are having a hard time with health-care reimbursement. It is causing many problems and Congress needs to come up with a solution. ¨This article states several promising models, including patient-centered medical homes, accountable care organizations, and various payment bundling pilots, that could offer lessons for a larger reform

Value-Based Payments (VBP) is a tactic utilized by purchasers to encourage quality and the value of health care services (Health Care Incentives, 2017). Value-Based Payments offer financial incentives to doctors, hospitals, medical groups, and health care providers (Webb, 2015). The incentive is to provide better care for their patients and to focus on the quality of the care they are providing rather than the number of people they treat. This payment model is being used as a way to keep DSRIP sustainable (NYSDOH, 2015). The VBP Model offers a roadmap, which outlines a five year plan to attaining inclusive payment reform; which includes a shift to 80% VBP through Medicaid managed care plans (The Commonwealth Fund, 2017). This payment reform should be accomplished by the end of DSRIP enactment period of five years (The Commonwealth Fund, 2017).

The predominant system of payment to healthcare service providers had been the fee-for-service system for years. This system rewarded the providers for the intensity of their work. However, greater volume of services was not necessarily associated with better service quality. This incentive structure had policy makers concerned and thus, came the pay-for-performance into being established to improve service quality. The use of this system has been expanded by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA). Many studies were performed to identify ways to make the system more effective. However, the studies had somewhat mixed results.

Effective payment program strategies are a major part of administering health care. Reimbursement programs are a part of the United States (U.S) health care system. They represent a financial tool for providing cash flow to service physicians and hospitals. Most often, the ability to provide quality health care depends on the payment for the services given by physicians and hospitals. This paper presents a view of payment reimbursement systems within the health care industry. A comparative overview and description of payment reimbursement will be given in order to understand the flow of finances in the health care industry. The focus will be on the levy and fee-for-service reimbursement systems. Readers will then be able to conclude that

The need to improve quality in health care is increasing and a major component of quality health care is patient satisfaction. Patient satisfaction is critical to how well a patient does and research has identified a clear link between patient outcomes and patient satisfaction scores. Patient satisfaction can be an indicator of provider performance and an important dimension of value-based health care under the Affordable Care Act.

Under payment, an ideal healthcare system will have the challenge of delivering higher quality for lower costs. The system’s payment reform will involve a transition from fee-for-service to global from systems that are value-based important for the achievement of the overall healthcare goals. An ideal healthcare payment system will give a great deal of support to value-driven system of healthcare delivery (Kent, 2013). The fee-for-service payment system will be of great importance to the healthcare system as it will help control the costs of health care.

Pay for performance is to link employees’ salary or salary increase to his or her performance. It seems to be a reasonable or attractive idea but it often does not work well in organizations. Please use at least 4 motivation theories or models to explain why pay for performance may not work as expected—particularly in government and nonprofit organizations.