What Is Sugar Tax To Reduce Debt

Sugar is everywhere in our lives. When you eat, sugar is in the food such as hamburger, sandwiches, pizza, bread, etc. When you drink, sugar is in the beverage like soda, juice, coffee and even milk. Furthermore, sugar exists in snacks such as cookies, cupcakes, biscuits and so on. I cannot list everything with sugar here. Actually, when we eat, we eat sugar. Unfortunately, sugar is now considering a toxic to our bodies. It causes diseases like obesity, diabetes, heart attack and cancer, etc. As sugar threatens the public health, government is considering curb sugar consumption by taxes on sugar; restrictions placed on food production and even age requirements on purchasing sugary foods. For this research project, I decided to pursue the question, Should sugar be regulated? This question deserves to be examined because we need to make some change for life to reduce sugar intake but at the same time it’s controversial that whether the government should intervene and regulate sugar. I wonder how the government will take appropriate measures to regulate sugar as well as improve public health.

In our daily life, we all have tasted sugar probably more than you think. Sugar is something we enjoy without having much concern, in fact this can be problematic. With the amount of sugar we take in, it can affect our health in the future. Therefore, the US government should create strict sugar regulations, in order to prevent future health problems of its citizens. The regulation can hopefully help prevent the increasing rate of diabetes, more risk of liver issues, and reduce people’s sugar addiction. Most people are unaware of these problems and it’s up to the US to make a change in people's health with a strict sugar regulation.

“Soda Taxes: Gaining Steam or Getting Steamrolled?” is an enticing article by Anna Gorman that focuses on the issue of taxing sugary beverages and the effect it will ultimately have on the health of the general population. She mentions that the tax could reduce the rates of obesity and diabetes in the affected areas. She also points out the counter to this claim, that soda taxes may not have any effect on obesity rates at all and may give the government too much power over the consumer choice. Overall, she seems to advocate that soda is an unhealthy beverage and should be cut down among consumers. Soda however, is not the only unhealthy options out there. There is a plethora of products on the shelves of supermarkets and sold at restaurants.

Congress hereby finds and declares that the United States of America has experienced a dramatic increase in the number of obese people and the number of deaths caused by the symptoms of obesity. Obesity is the leading cause of preventable deaths and accounts for 18% of all deaths in America (Fox 2013); thus, a one-cent-per-ounce tax on sugary beverages will decrease consumer rates and lower the obesity level. The rise in sweetened beverage consumption is parallel to the increase in obesity rates. Soda and other sugary substances are the largest contributors to sugar and calorie intake; soft drinks, energy drinks, sweet teas, and sports drinks are considered the top most consumed beverages in America (Kickthecan 2014). The annual medical costs due to obesity and overweight Americans is also staggering. The proposed solution will not hinder the necessary diet and nutritional value of one 's meal, but rather improve it by reducing the amount of sugar American 's consume, especially since sugary beverages are a large factor of obesity that can be costly and life threatening.

Did you know that of 39,000 people surveyed that drink sugary drinks 26% of those people are also obese. Also a full 42% of the annual $142 billion in health care costs attributable to obesity. One pro of taxing sugary drinks is it will raise money. Another pro would be deterring customers from buying so many sugary drinks and maybe instead buy something healthy. Some people say that taxing sugary drinks would only make customers buy sugary drinks different places so the tax is lower. Although people would buy them other places to get a lower price it would still raise money. These are reasons why sugary drinks should be taxed.

Why do we need to limit the sugar. Added Sugar has an effect where to much sugar can cause heath problems. I support the regulation of sugar if it is part of sugar if it is part of a comprehensive effort to improve the diet of Americans. Sugar carry’s diseases. In The Toxic Truth about Sugar, economic development means that the populations of low- and middle, 80% of deaths attributable to them occur in these countries. may loses the population because of the sugar effect. Due to the effect of the sugar, sugar may give the people disease. The amount of added sugar can cause heath problem or other side effect, so we should watch

One of the biggest health concerns facing children in the United States to is childhood obesity. Childhood obesity has grown to become a major epidemic all across the nation effecting millions of children both physically and emotionally. One of the biggest contributors to this public health issue is sugar sweetened beverages. Sugar-sweetened beverages are an unregulated and out control beverages that is being consumed by millions of children each and every day. Progress is being made on the local level to treat and control this concern, but in order to truly make a difference a federal policy needs to be implemented. This federal policy needs to tax sugar-sweetened beverages to encourage consumer to make healthier and cheaper choices. A federal

The Consumers Health Forum, the Heart Foundation, the Obesity Policy Coalition and the Public Health Association all suggest that if the Federal Government put a tax on junk food and sugary drinks, it would have a distinguishable effect on the health of Australians. The aim of this idea is to tackle the issue

In the last ten years or so, sugary bevearges have been a argument in American cities such as New York, North California, and Philadelphia. For thiis reason tax on soda and realitives have increase so wildly that made some cites stop selling taxed beverages. For example, Philadelphia pays three cent per ounce but they recommend two cent is more acceptable then three cent. as a result, of soda companies paying taxes provide city needs and communities. As some people say soda taxes are poor people taxes but, poor people are the ones always targeted in the market. In either case, taxes might be unreasonable however, it help our

People need freedom. There should be NO tax on sugary drinks. But there is obesity and diabetes and if there was a tax It could help many people out. The tax will help to put an end to diabetes and obesity. The tax also could help people not spend on unhealthy foods and drinks. There should be a tax on sugary drinks because it could help many people.

Taxing sugary drinks should increase because it could save lives. For about a decade, policy makers and the soda industry have been fighting about the idea of a big soda tax. But taxing sugary drinks should be proceeded in order to help improve health problems. The tax is meant to protect people and to offset costs produced by products that can cause harm. Losing weight is not easy and the easiest way would start with a soft drink tax. The Department of Taxation and Finance needs to recognize that saving lives can be made through a tax on sugary drinks

This policy was introduced in March 2016, George Osbourne announced a sugar levy on soft drink companies to start in 2018. Under this policy, companies will be taxed on sales of medium and high sugar drinks ( excluding fruit juice and milk based). Public health experts from the Chief medical to the British Heart Foundation agree that sugar sweetened soft drinks are a major source of sugar for Children and teenagers. ( include reference saved on computer). This levy is expected to have a positive impact on health of individuals in the UK. Excess sugar consumption is associated with obesity and excess weight which increases the likelihood of individuals developing a wide range of serious health problems such as type 2 diabetes, heart disease

Sugar in drinks and food contributes to many diseases such hypertension, tooth decay, diabetes, and obesity. By increasing taxes on sugary products, will in return reduce the consumption rate by people. This

“Sin” taxes have been proven as a way to curtail known unhealthy behaviors. Soda taxes are most accepted if taxes collected are earmarked for health specific programs (Chaufin et al., 2010). The cons are the consumers are the voters and taxing may equate to loss of votes, taxing may not be equitable to individuals that do not have the disease, and finally, an undue burden may be placed on lower socio-economic demographics as these groups often have limited access to food vendors that primarily sale what would be considered taxed foods. Though these sin taxes are proven to work well with tobacco and alcohol consumption, altering a persons’ diet needs to be more individualized and realistically approached. Lower socio-economic individuals should not feel added burden as a tax; which would be a negative impact (Kuchar et al., 2005). Legality issues are regarded as low, but would require state government support to enact. This would likely not be popularly accepted and have a minimal impact for any increase in tax rate.

To protect individual health problems New Zealand authority would have introduce sugar tax, and it is important for the health community in the whole nation.