What Is The Chinese Room Argument

Knowledge is something that we know that you have facts to back up to form your argument and is justified. Knowledge isn’t something that can be created overnight but something that we form over the course of life. I feel that being raised by my grandmother I gained a lot of knowledge and wisdom because she has years and experience over me and wouldn’t tell me anything to hurt me but to help me in life. We all learn from mistakes but with mistakes gain wisdom then knowledge. We don’t gain knowledge overnight but with growth we become more aware of our worldview.

Knowledge is the beginning of wisdom. Knowledge is a gift from God. Knowledge is God, God is a someone, not a something. Full knowledge concerning God can’t be explained.

to understanding is one everyone must endure and take on with all the trials and tribulations that come with life.

1b. To know is to comprehend a statement or a fact. To understand is to grasp the idea as a whole and master the concept.

year of his life. This year, Shao will take the National University Entrance Examinations, which

| The study of knowledge: What constitutes knowledge, the nature of knowledge, and whether knowledge is possible

Knowledge can be interpreted in different ways where one scholar defines knowledge as a learnt education another interprets knowledge as intelligence. Knowledge is continuing a process commencing at birth.  Belisle (2006) states

Knowledge is “thinking and critical reflection, rather than reliance on the way things appear to us” (Internet Encyclopedia, n.d., para.

John Searle uses the Chinese room argument as an example to explain Artificial Intelligence and if computers do/can think. John Searle believes that the person sitting inside the Chinese room does not understand Chinese at all because he has no knowledge of Chinese, much less understands it. Seeing that he has no knowledge of Chinese, giving him a simple rule book helping him answer Chinese questions in Chinese still does not give him any understanding of Chinese. When we replace the Chinese symbols the person is trying to interpret with a computer database, and the rule book with a computer program, it is clear to see what Searle is trying to imply.

Knowledge: It is information that has been synthesized so that relations and interactions are defined and formalized; Knowledge answers questions of “why” or “how”. It explores options.

In the book written by Nonaka (2000), presented a summary of the ideas that underlie the notion of knowledge: (1) Knowledge is justified true believe; (2) Knowledge is something that is explicit (tacit knowledge); (3) knowledge creation effectively dependent on the context that allows the creation of occurrence; (4) knowledge creation involves five main steps are: a). Sharing knowledge explicitly (tacit knowledge), b) created the concept, c). Justifying concepts, d). Build a prototype, and e). Do the dissemination of knowledge.

In the Chinese room argument presented by John Searle, he argues that programs are not minds. Premises that Searle gives for this claim is that programs are entirely formal (syntactical) and mind have semantic. Syntax by itself is neither constitutive of nor sufficient for semantics. In this paper, I will argue that Searle’s argument is misleading us, because Searle's claim is based on that understanding (mind) occurs if and only if computer knows human language semantic. Searle’s Chinese room argument is suppose that he is locked in a room with two windows (one has I on the outside and another has O on the outside which means that Input and output).

This essay proved through a series of evidence that Brian Aldiss communicates in “Who Can Replace a Man” that machines are ultimately dependent on human intelligence. The machines argue logically but then shut down, obey human orders, and do not start working without receiving orders from the radio operated by

“Knowing is striving to understand an event as it has meaning in the life of the other” (Swanson, 1991, p. 163). Subcategories such as avoiding assumption, centering on the one cared for,

Knowledge is defined to be facts, information, and skills acquired through experience or education. There are two categories that fall under knowledge; personal knowledge and shared knowledge. Shared knowledge refers to what “we know because.” It can also be defined as communicated and constructed knowledge; within culture, social norms, and semiotics. Personal knowledge refers to “I know because.” An expanded definition of personal knowledge refers to personal experiences, values, and perceptions. Shared knowledge changes and evolves over time because of methods that are continuously shared. It is assembled by a group of people. Personal knowledge, on the other hand, depends crucially on the experiences of a particular individual. It is gained