What Is The Difference Between The Federal Constitution And The Tribal Government

Answer: A federal system of government is based on federalism with the federal and state governments. The farmers choose to design this system of government because they didn’t want government to have too much power so they split the powers and role of government into the three braches where they ach have specific duties and specific

Under the US Constitution our legislature is a bicameral containing a House of Representatives and a Senate. The Australian constitution has a parliamentary system, which is not bicameral, although their system has a house of representatives and a senate; these two houses have to share power with the Queen. The Prime Minister leads the legislature.

The United States Constitution and Nevada constitution are important for the citizens of Nevada. For many, the first thought of the word constitution is often associated with the United States Constitution. The word constitution is often a document of fundamental principles according to not just the United States, but states, corporations, and organizations. The Nevada constitution is the law that governs the people of Nevada and the United States Constitution applies to all states in the union. Despite them both being constitutions, the United States Constitution and the Nevada constitution have many differences and similarities.

There are substantial differences between the United States and Nevada Constitutions to include its length, how their judges interpret law, the powers of their leaders, their forms of democracy, their meeting mandates and their system of selecting judges.

     The Division of government for America is divided up into the Judicial, Executive, and Legislative Branches. In the Iroquois constitution it also splits up the Mohawk Council into three parties: the Tekarihoken, Ayonhwhathah and Shadekariwadeare the first party; Sharenhowaneh, Deyoenhegwenh and Oghrenghrehgowah are the second party, and Dehennakrineh, Aghstawenserenthah and Shoskoharowaneh are the third party. The Purpose of the third party is to monitor what the first and second parties are discussing to make sure they don’t make any mistakes. The way that there are 3 parties in the Iroquois

The federal government and state governments have had a long history of powers struggles. The struggle goes back and forth between who has the right to make decisions and if there is a problem who should fix it. Sometimes it is better for the federal government to fix issues and during other situations it is better for the state or local governments to fix other issues. In the PBS special of the United States Constitution, Peter Sagal travels around the states documenting the various roles and impact the government has on the country as a whole and on the individual states.

10 of 19 answered They divided power between the federal and state

In document a james madison states that power “is first divided two distinct government states and federal” . this decides the process of federalism where state and federal government share power regulate trade, foreign relations, provide army, declare war, make money, post offices, make laws and states controle local government, elections, schools, marriage

There are many similarities between the constitution and the principles of the Iroquois. Researchers Vine Deloraia, Bruce Johnson, and Donald Grind have found that the very foundation of both sets of principles mirror each other (Johansen 1998:79):

Throughout Indian Country tribes have their own courts to address legal matters. However, the Navajo Nation has a court system that stands apart from other tribes. Howard L. Brown Esq. wrote, “The Navajo Nation’s Peacemaker Division: An Integrated Community-Based Dispute Resolution Forum” which was published in the American Indian Law Review 1999-2000 issue and was reprinted in the May/July 2002 issue of Dispute Resolution Journal. As a former judicial law clerk for the Supreme Court of the Navajo Nation, Brown gained firsthand experience with the Peacemaker Division within the Navajo Nation’s Judicial Branch. He details the history, development and ceremonies associated with this resolution forum. Two

Constitutions have been around for many years. The first ones on record go back as far as the fifteenth century. There are many uses for them, though often enough are used to outline laws and basic rights of the people under that government. Two very different, yet very alike constitutions are the Iroquois and the United States Constitutions. They have many differences, but just as many similarities.

The similarity in government Greece and China share are the way they rule over their civilians. China has dynasties which mean one person out of a family is in control of the civilization. And one of Greece’s forms of government is a monarchy, which is ruled by one king. Since China used dynasties to elect their rulers it was not very fair to the civilians because after a family member died another one stepped up or another dynasty was created. It also was not very fair for the monarchies in Greece because the rulers and the people in the city-state would not always get along.

The Nevada constitution and the US Constitution each grant or ban certain rights to its citizens, for example, in order for an amendment to be passed the US Constitution relies on two thirds of the Congress and three fourths of the state approval. Furthermore, the Nevada Constitution who only requires the legislative body and approval of the citizens in order for the change to be made. In addition, the state Constitution focuses mainly on limiting powers, rather than granting powers since all appointing official have been established. Finally, unlike the US Constitution who grants power to federal government, the state constitution grants power among their own state thus, protecting the citizens rights and freedom by lawgiving of

Finally, large and small state both treated equally so no tyranny can happen between small states and large. The legislative branch is divided into house of representative and senate.

Joseph Hamilton writes, “In Southern California, where my tribe calls home, disenrollment is common, in part because of big gaming revenues and internal power struggles. It is also a symptom of the breakdown of traditional tribal power structures. Simply put, some tribal leaders listen to lawyers instead of elders” (n.d.). The smaller amount of tribal members present constitutes more money for the remaining members (Stretten, 2014).