What Is The Difference Between To Kill A Mockingbird Movie And Book

In comparison with the many similarities in the book and movie versions of To Kill A Mockingbird, there are also many differences. One huge difference that was almost impossible to miss, was the absence of Aunt Alexandra. Atticus' sister, Alexandra, was the thorn in Scout's side throughout the book. She always wanted Scout to act more like a lady. Towards the end, she became more like a mother in soothing Scout and trying to reassure her that Jem was not dead. I think Aunt Alexandra was a huge part of the story, and I think they should have kept her in the movie. Be that as it may, the movie moved along quite well without her. I also found there to be huge differences in the trial. For example, although Mayella Ewell, pretended to be very upset by Atticus' questioning, she did not accuse him of mocking her. I thought that this was somewhat significant because it was one of Mayella's tactics for trying to get pity from the jury. A more minor difference, was the combination of Miss Maudie and Miss Rachel. The two neighbors of the Finches were combined into one person for the movie. I do not think it mattered very much, because they served the same purpose in the end. They were there as comfort to Atticus and the children. A larger difference in the movie pertained to Mrs. Dubose. Mrs. Dubose did make a small appearance in the movie, but her role was cut down quite a bit from what it was originally in the book. Mrs. Dubose, a morphine addict,

“To Kill a Mockingbird” by Harper Lee, is an inspiring and amazing book. When you are reading the book, it is very easy to imagine what is happening. But, when you watch the movie, it is a little bit sad. It is emotionally sad, making you upset, not because of what is happening, but because it is so different. The book “To Kill a Mockingbird” is better than the movie, because the order is different, and the book included more characters and details.

One character that was missing from the movie that played an important role was Aunt Alexandra. First of all by having Aunt Alexandra in the film the reader doesn't see the feminine side to Scout instead only Scout's tomboy side is portrayed. Also, not having Aunt Alexandra around means there is no one to challenge Atticus's authority. Without Aunt Alexandra, Miss Stephanie is also left out. Seeing how Jem and Scout act around another family member is impossible when the directors' cut Aunt Alexandra out of the movie. Showing how the children act around another family member could show different sides of their personalities. A good explanation for leaving Aunt Alexandra out could be that the movie would have just been too long with too many extra parts that may have not been necessary. Rachael Haverford, the Finches' next door neighbor, was another character deleted from the book, Dill was not living with .The movie and the book have differences in the overall way the characters appear. For instance, Jem isn't nearly as physically fit in the movie as he is described in the book. Also in the book Scout is the main character and in the movie Scout doesn't really know what's going on. All of the scenes in the movie that present Scout as anything more than the narrator were cut out. In the book, Scout is more of a girl caught in the middle of Atticus and Alexandria. She acts a lot like Alexandria although she doesn't know it.

As most everyone knows, there are differences between a book and it’s movie adaptation. This is applicable to the book and it’s movie counterpart To Kill a Mockingbird, as well. But aside from the differences, there are also similarities between these two.

The 2004 film version of Frankenstein by Mary Shelley has many similarities as well as differences from the novel. There are differences in time, setting, the plot, and the characters. Some of these differences have to do with the amount of time allowed in the movie and the way the characters are portrayed on screen versus in a book. Although there are many differences, there are also many similarities. The overall plot line and main ideas are similar in the book and movie. The movie is different from the book in many ways, but they are based on the same plot line and have a lot of similar ideas.

Although the movie and book, To Kill a Mockingbird, are based off of the same storyline, they have some very key differences. To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee is a classic novel about the childhood of two children, Jean Louise and Jem, who live with their father, Atticus Finch. This captivating story takes place in Maycomb, Alabama during the Great Depression and was written in 1960. This novel teaches readers a great deal about society and life during the Great Depression. The differences found between Harper Lee’s book and Robert Mulligan’s movie are countless and have a great impact on the theme and plot.

Books Better Than The Movie “It is a sin to kill a mockingbird” (Lee 119) said Atticus which may reflect to Tom Robinson a innocent black man convinced of the crime of rapeing a white woman a case that the only evidence is white woman's word against a black man's word Tom is later killed. In To kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee and To kill a Mockingbird by Barbara kopple although the movie is enjoyable the book brings more detail and characters. The three main differences between the book and movie are narration change, character absence , and scene absences. In the book the story is told in scout's eyes while in the movie due to a visual purpose isn't stressed as much as in the movie. In the duration of the book due to scout telling the story it has a child perspective “But he’s gone drowned his dinner in syrup” ( 32) said scout which brings a presence of immaturity.

A significant difference is that in the book the point of view is from Scout in the book which allows the reader to see deeper into her personality and character growth unlike in the movie. Such as when she's standing on Mr. Arthur's porch and sees things from his point of view “Summertime, and his children played … enacting a strange little drama of their own invention... Atticus was right...he said you never really know a man until you stand in his shoes and walk around in them” which didn’t happen in the movie.

Like in most movie adaptations of books, there were consistent similarities between the book To Kill a Mockingbird and its movie counterpart. For example, the death of Tom Robinson is in both book and movie. Tom's death was incredibly important to the story. The movie would have been way too emotional and ooey-googey if he would have lived. However, the differences always outweigh the similarities.

The film and the novel To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee displays the harsh reality for blacks in the early 1930’s. Scout Finch, a girl from Alabama narrates the novel. During this time is the great depression where segregation and racism is not uncommon amongst whites and blacks. The novel was such a success for its eye opening storyline that it was later turned into a film directed by Robert Mulligan. Although the film and the novel have many similarities, two scenes made a huge difference. One, being that Mrs.Dubose was not included in the film as she was in the book. The second scene that should have been in the film was when Calpurnia phoned the white people instead of knocking on the front door.

A crucial similarity in both the novel To Kill a Mockingbird and the movie is the advice that Atticus teaches the kids. The first piece of advice that played an important role in both versions of To Kill a Mockingbird is that “you never really understand a person until you consider things from his point of view … until you climb into his skin and walk”. (Page 39) This advice, which was given by Atticus to Scout helped her develop throughout the book. Before Atticus told her this lesson, Scout lacked sympathy and judged people who were different, for example Boo Radley. However, at the end of the novel and movie Scout was able to comprehend Boo Radley’s perspective of all the events that happened throughout the novel. She claimed that “just

There are distinguishable disparities and similarities between the book and the film of To Kill A Mockingbird. The characters, main focus, point of views, lessons and actions can all be compared and contrasted. Although the novel and the film are exceptionally alike there are noticeable differences.

The scene is very different in the book. Another difference is the scene where Jem finds a medal in the tree. In the book, Jem and Scout were walking back from school when they noticed it. The time was at night in the movie when atticus was bringing Cal home. But in the book the time was after school

Have you ever been subject to an injustice? Or have you ever witnessed one? Do you know how it feels to have been given the short end of the stick just because of something as unimportant as your skin color? That is the exact feeling that Harper Lee presents to us through both the book and the movie of To Kill a Mockingbird. However, just as there are in any movie based off of a book, there were significant differences between the two. I believe that the director of the movie used these deviations to help make the story more powerful, fix errors, and to better explain concepts that had been skimmed over in order to make a 376 page book into a 2 hour movie, and I think that it worked out suitably.

To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee is not only a Pulitzer Prize winning book, but also an Academy Award winning movie. The book, a cherished classic of modern literature, deals with many controversial and serious issues while still portraying a humorous and playful exterior. It introduces many teenagers to the issues of the past and the present such as racial and social inequality and injustice. The film itself does not exhibit the same effect as the book as it leaves out much of the character development. Jem, brother of the narrator, for example, is poorly illustrated, and is not seen as many of the amazing traits he is. Told by Scout’s narration and through Lee’s development of Jem, readers can see that he is a smart, creative, courageous,