preview

What Is The Importance Of The Pardoner's Speech In The Canterbury Tales

Decent Essays
Open Document

The Canterbury Tales by Chaucer tells the stories of several individuals on a pilgrimage to a temple at Canterbury, taking place in the early 14th century in England. Thirty-one people, all of differing livelihoods and lifestyles, embark this trek. The rambunctious group ends up in a tavern, and there the host proposes a story-telling challenge. Particularly, there is a Pardoner – a preacher of some sort. In the Pardoners Prologue, the preacher tells an audience of lords of his deceitful way of life. He is in ministry solely for profit, and tricks gullible people into Christianity, by selling pig bones and relics, and attempts to convince his companions to purchase his relics. However, unfortunately, his unconvincing speech indicates poor rhetorical …show more content…

He speaks in a manner that causes his credibility to greatly dwindle, failing to morally appeal to his audience. This represents an extremely ineffective way to convince an audience to buy anything. "And then I show to them like precious stones. My long glass cases crammed with rags and bones, for these are relics (so they think)” (337-379). By admitting to his listeners the extremity of his deceit, he immediately proves himself an unethical priest. Additionally, the pardoner does not seem to heed the emotions of his audience – foolishly, he titles gullible the people who purchase his “soul-saving” relics, but proceeds to offer the relics to his audience, implying that they, too, are ignorant. “These ignorants sit down, and right to work I go…and tell a hundred silly stories more” …show more content…

Throughout the entirety of the speech, the priest is strangely honest about his lifestyle – honest about his dishonesty, ironically. “Though I’m a man of vices through and through, I can still tell a moral tale to you” (410). It would be utter foolishness for anyone to trust a priest who flaunts his wrongdoing, but who preaches against the same sin. The pardoner’s style of persuasion appears extremely contradictory, as he boasts about his sinful lifestyle, and sounds like a crazed drunk who lies compulsively. Speaking with such a tone as the pardoner is an ineffective way to appeal to one’s audience. Furthermore, the speech of the pardoner is uniform in structure all throughout the text. The lack of sentence variation causes the speech to sound repetitive and bland. For example, the pardoner states: “For my concern is only with collection” (403), and several lines after, “It’s greed alone that makes me sermonize” (424). Lastly, the pardoner is about to tell his tale and reminds his audience that this tale is, “…one that I preach to bring the money in” (461). Rhetorically, this repetition of language fails to help the pardoner convince his listeners – an example of poor appeal to ethos, as it causes the audience to question the capability of the

Get Access