What Is The Literary Analysis OfThe Republic Of Plato

The start of theater and drama in Ancient Greece took form in about 5th century b.c, with Sophocles being considered the master of tragedy. In his plays and those of the same genre, classic fables that the people of the era knew well were used to tell the stories. The tragic hero’s of these stories often strive to live honorable and righteous lives, but because of some mistake their lives would often great and noble death. The idea that serving the state was proper way to gain honor was a popular belief during this time period. This philosophy was echoed by Plato in his book, the Republic. Plato dealt with establishing the ideal state. The way to achieve the ideal state was through striving for justice. Justice, according to Plato, is doing only the tasks assigned to them by nature. This is the fundamental notion for his creation of an ideal city. It is both knowing what true justice is and where one belongs in the city that the ideal can be achieved. Justice in a city can be found in an individual as well outside the individual because it is a concept that is universal. If a ruler of a state was to maintain order and control over his people

Instead, by Socrates using the writing works of his students as influence to his own works, he was able to develop into the writer that Plato was anticipating for us to one day in this life to witness. These two philosophers, Plato and Socrates complement each other’s style, believing that psyche can is to be immutable and immortal. Both philosophers also have beliefs that one is able to remember the state of the pure state. Socrates thoughts to Plato are not as advanced as he think Socrates should be. Plato uses idealism for his own philosophy meaning he seeks the ultimate perfection for his creative work. When Socrates died Plato became deeply depressed and felt almost hopeless. Resulting from this time in Plato’s life, is when he created Republic as an outline of his life. Through Republic Plato is describing form his point of view of the

Plato's Republic      Critics of The Republic, Plato's contribution to the history of political theory, have formed two distinct opinions on the reasoning behind the work. The first group believes that The Republic is truly a model for a political society, while the other strongly objects to that, stating it as being far too fantastic for any society to operate successfully by these suggested methods. In an exchange between Crito and Dionysius, this argument is first introduced, with Crito siding with those who agree that The Republic is a realistic political model, and Dionysius arguing on behalf of those who doubt it as being realistic, claiming it to be a criticism of politics in general.

In the Republic, Plato starts his argument by saying that education in music and poetry should occur before any physical training. This is due to the fact that our mental abilities develop much faster than our physical strength. We use our brains to analyze the world around us by listening and learning from others. When we’re younger, our brains are more malleable and easier to manipulate. As children, we’re more likely to believe every story we hear because we don’t know any better. Since children don’t know the difference between what’s allegorical and what’s the truth, everything presented to them is the truth. Plato expresses his concern for this, as most of the stories children hear include arguing and punishment. Children will then take this as the truth and view fighting as a normal and a reasonable way to solve conflict. This is what makes narrative art and drama dangerous for children, who more or less start off as decent people but are then corrupted by the allegories they hear during their childhood. Adults, on the other hand, can still be corrupted by narrative art, though it’s not as simple.

Plato was born around 427 BC, in Athens Greece to rich and politically involved family. Plato's parents spared no expense in educating him; he was taught at the finest schools. He was taught by Socrates and defended Socrates when he was on trial. Plato traveled to Italy and may have even visited Egypt before founding The Academy. Plato also visited Sicily and instructed a young king there before returning to The Academy to teach for twenty years before his death in 347 BC at the age of eighty.

To Plato, the world and mind set is a mimesis of the true absolute world. That all shapes found by definition here is transcendent in the realm that is greater and above this reality. When applying this belief of ideal concepts in forms to our world, Plato then can theorize importance of professions here based on its direction to those praised forms above. In Art & Beauty by Hofstadter and Kuhns, Plato’s written works from 400 B.C. can map out his philosophy on artworks. We particularly find that Plato creates a distinction between poetry and art works as two different classes. Plato seeks a higher reality than the imminent one around us, therefore, everything he finds of art and anything else here in this reality will ultimately be based on its true form. We can find these answers in Ion when the famed minstrel, named Ion, asks of Plato to explain why he only stays

Plato created an academy dedicated to geometry. He had a bunch of successful scholars that attended his school. Some scholars stayed for plato, but others left to alexandria to further their studies. Plato’s academy was dedicated to geometry, and it was extremely important then, and it is even important

Throughout the early books of Plato’s The Republic, Socrates and his interlocutors Adeimantus, Polemarchus, Glaucon, Thrasymachus, and to a lesser extent Cephalus, explore what it means to be just and why justice is preferable to injustice. This topic was brought up in a monologue from Cephalus, who is an old patriarch that represents Greek tradition and thus offers a traditional view of justice. One by one, all of the interlocutors attempt to define justice, with Socrates disagreeing with at least some part of each definition. After not being able to define justice for a majority of the early portions of The Republic, Socrates finally comes to the conclusion that “[the just man] doesn’t let each part in him mind other people 's business or the three classes in the soul meddle with each other, he arranges himself, becomes his own friend, and harmonizes the three part” (443d2-6). In other words, the just man lets each part of his soul rule itself. The rational part of our soul seeks truth, the spirited part of our soul seeks honor, and the appetitive part of our soul seeks our more earthly desires, such as sex, food and economic success. After this, the conversation would seem to be over. As we know, however, The Republic is not even half over. There are several critical factors behind the continuation of The Republic, but it all has to do with unanswered questions, continued debate and, above all, digression..

Republic, perhaps Plato’s most famous work focusing on justice and its values, is also home to Socrates’ unique ideas and the challenges that he faces throughout his dialogues with other philosophers. Nevertheless, justice is not the only topic that Plato examines in his work. In the Republic, a simple discussion of the justice and the different characteristics of cities, escalates into a discussion about the souls of individuals. Socrates starts out by offering an agreement to the fact that since cities are made of individuals, their characteristics can also be found in individuals. From his writings, Plato exemplifies most of Socrates’ arguments towards the development of his own arguments. One very famous theory developed by Plato from

In Plato’s Republic, Glaucon is introduced to the reader as a man who loves honor, sex, and luxury. As The Republic progresses through books and Socrates’ arguments of how and why these flaws make the soul unhappy began to piece together, Glaucon relates some of these cases to his own life, and begins to see how Socrates’ line of reasoning makes more sense than his own. Once Glaucon comes to this realization, he embarks on a path of change on his outlook of what happiness is, and this change is evidenced by the way he responds during he and Socrates’ discourse.

The Republic is Plato’s best known work and gives and account of Socrates as he tackles several of some of the most intellectually important topics that humanity has known. This book has not only survived the test of time, but it is one of the world’s most influential books that has ever been written. The book starts by giving an argument that deals with the nature of justice that sets the foundation for the rest of the topics and the assumptions about what an ideal relationship with the state might be from a variety of different perspectives. For example, Socrates argues that one should be just for their own self-interest, which is also presented as the means to organizing society. There are ten books in the series however and a wide range of different topics are covered – everything from what knowledge constitutes, to the allegory about the cave, and to the ideal form and evolution of the form of government. The role of art in the society is also reviewed and Socrates is pictured as not a fan of imitative art. Although this work was produced more than two millennia ago, all of the themes that are presented in the book are still extremely relevant in today’s world as all of the topics covered have never been completely settled and the discussions and debates continue in contemporary society.

Plato is one of the most incredible and though provoking philosophers of all time. He demonstrates his intellectual capacity and vision in his work, Republic. Plato is essentially the mouthpiece for Socrates in this book, and they follow the dialogue form throughout the book. The essence of his thoughts in Republic is that justice is inherently good, the best way to live, and should be sought after in every way. He faces many tough arguments with those he is trying to convince, but eventually shows everyone, including the reader, how important justice really is. He helps put into perspective that a just reputation is appealing to everyone, but the intrinsic value of justice is ever more important. Plato goes into some incredibly complex and often surprising arguments about why justice is such a necessity in both civilizations and each individual. Plato emphasizes the importance of the values he knows to be best during the book, and a couple of those happen to be truth and wisdom. By pursuing both, he thinks people would be naturally inclined to opt for a just way of life. The thoughts and topics he delves into are simple in a way, but are infinitely complex when you take a step back and define or assign meaning to the concepts of truth and justice. The way we look at justice or truth is dependent upon what we assume both concepts mean. Plato clarifies these definitions because it gives clear meaning

Throughout Republic, Socrates discusses elements that comprise his ideal city. More specifically, in Republic X, Socrates examines the impact of poetry on his noble state. Coming from a negative standpoint, Socrates says that poetry is detrimental to the city for two reasons: one is that, “[poetry] arouses, nourishes, and strengthens this [inferior] part of the soul and so destroys the rational one…”, and the other, “an imitative poet puts a bad constitution in the soul of each individual by making images that are far removed from the truth and by gratifying the irrational part…”.

It is interesting to demonstrate components and elements of Plato’s idea of a Democratic government. Plato’s democracy was a governement for the people because all were welcome to participate, if interested. The government’s structure was split into groups including the ekklesia, boule, etc. Today, I am a part of the National Society of Collegiate Scholars (NSCS), and organization here at Temple University. NSCS demonstrates some of the components found in Plato’s democratic government. This paper will examine the connection between Plato’s Democratic government and the NSCS and at Temple.

Socrates was an influential Greek philosopher; however, he never wrote any book and his ideologies are mostly presented by Plato, who was his student. Plato explains Socrates’ attitude towards poetry in his books, the Republic and the Symposium. Afterward, he offers his perceptions and solutions to the matter. Plato’s Republic explains Socrates’ mindset towards poetry censorship. Socrates argued that poetry lacked wisdom because there was no censorship of works of poetry. As a result, poets can write about anything they wish to inscribe, which enhances imitation. On this note, Socrates argued that poetry exposed citizens to different forms of imitation, which would corrupt their minds because they had no restrictions.