preview

What Is The Outsider Reflective Statement

Good Essays

Reflective Statement

How was your understanding of cultural and contextual considerations of the work developed through the interactive oral? (300-400 words)

Through the interactive oral, I got to understand more deeply about the cultural and contextual considerations of the work. Before, my understanding of the work before was very basic: the Arab-French relationship, the First World War going on and the influence of the author’s life on the work. Meursault killed the Arab because of the sun, because he felt like it. Had it been any other person, be it French or Arab, he would have still done it at that particular time and moment. It was because of the Arabs’ inferiority that, at Meursault’s trial, he was condemned for his morals instead …show more content…

It was published in 1942, during the last stretch of the Second World War, when the enveloping atmosphere was one of pessimism, desperation and of spent hope due to the senseless fighting. The circumstances of the novel’s composition were an era where one of its main belief of there being no greater meaning to anything making it a natural backdrop for the theme of existentialism. The main character of the novel, Meursault, is in many ways an embodiment of existentialism, a projector of the philosophy’s ideologies in his thoughts and …show more content…

The novel was written in a first person narrative, enabling us to peer inside Meursault’s inner world and his internal dialogue. This narrative style is confrontational as readers are thrust into a society suffused with uncertainty and discomfort, forced to empathise with the character. Standing out right at the beginning is Meursault’s apathy towards the death of his mother. The novel’s first lines are: “Mother died today. Or maybe yesterday, I don’t know.” (Camus, 2000) His thoughts were distant, devoid of emotion. The short and precise sentences in addition to the sparing use of transition words and phrases unsettle the reader. On examination, Meursault’s emotional spectrum was limited, oscillating in a mellow range from being “satisfied” to being “annoyed”. Things were only evaluated using simplistic words that portray the bare minimum such as “pleasant”, “unpleasant” or “boring”. All of the above shows existentialist ideas, how Meursault’s world was centered in the present, focused on physical rather than emotional stimuli. His actions were almost spontaneous, heavily dependent on his current mood and feelings. Events were dictated monotonously as they passed by. Meursault was “always preoccupied by what was about to happen, today or tomorrow”, his immediate reality. He displayed little care, regret or hesitation in his actions. This is concurrent with the existentialist

Get Access