Does Brutus Use Ethos Pathos Logos In Julius Caesar

Antony uses an abundance of pathos in his speech. One example is: “Caesar was my friend and just to me” (III, ii, 86). Using pathos helps the audience make connections with him. He also reads Caesar’s will which makes the people feel guilty about turning against Caesar during Brutus’ speech. He shows them the stabs wounds on Caesar’s coat and names which conspirator stabbed him. The Roman people now feel pity and anger towards the conspirators. Overall, Antony was smart with his words and won over the Roman people better than

After Brutus finishes his speech, Antony speaks about his opinion on the issue; unlike Brutus, Antony acts slyly and communicates a very manipulative tone to persuade the Romans to rebel. Because of Antony's use of parallelism, he creates vivid reasoning for his speech. He states, “ I come here to bury Caesar, not to praise him” (III.ii.44). By using this device, he shows the people of Rome that he isn't praising Caesar, he is putting the leader to rest. This particular line creates a very manipulative tone, because his speech is all about what great this Caesar has done and how he wants to rebel against the conspirators. Further more, Antony uses a lot of irony to slyly get his point across. One example that he uses throughout the speech is “Yet Brutus says he was ambitious, and Brutus is a honorable man” (III.ii.44). Because of the repitition of this ironic statement, the meaning of it changes and intensifies. At first, his tone was sincere, but as the speech progresses, you can see his sarcastic tone increases. Antony does this because he has to use this device to surpass the regulations of Brutus, as well as make the romans listen. Lastly, he uses personification to give life and further meaning to a word. Early in the speech, Antony says, “The evil

To start his speech, Antony opens with some kind words about Caesar. Antony uses ethos by speaking kindly of Caesar and saying, “He was my friend, he was faithful and just to me” (line 81). Antony appears to be a honest and humble man mourning for his friend. By saying “Brutus is an honorable man” (line 83), Antony places himself on the crowd’s side because up to this point the crowd is in favor of Brutus. Antony has made himself seem more trustworthy which also utilizes ethos. He then continues to speak of Caesar’s great deeds that do not support Brutus’s claim of Caesar’s ambition. For example, Antony tells of Caesar saying, “He brought many captives home to Rome whose ransoms brought wealth to the city” (line 83). This is all Brutus wants Antony to say but Antony continues and asks the crowd, “Is this the work of an ambitious man” (line 89)? Antony is using logos to influence the Roman people because he provides a counterexample to the claims of Caesar’s ambition. Furthermore, Antony places doubt in Brutus by saying, “Yet Brutus says he was ambitious, and Brutus is an honorable man” (lines 91-92). This use of logos allows Antony to prove Brutus wrong, even if he does not say it out loud.

By contrast Antony from Julius caesar heavily relies upon the power of language and its ability to exploit the human flaw that is emotion, and by doing so manipulate ones perception through a emotionally (pathos) driven argument. Antony has a greater understanding of the people and knows that they are passionate people who will be swayed by such talk. Also Antony unlike Brutus uses iambic pentameter this shows that he has a higher authority which would make the audience listen more carefully. After each argument Antony produces in Caesar’s defense, he uses irony through the lines “But Brutus says he was ambitious, and Brutus is an honorable man”. This line is repeated a number of times creating an anaphora. As well as slowly dismantling Brutus’

Antony uses his speech as a way to counteract everything Brutus states and to win over the people. Antony's credibility is being Caesar's friend and not once backstabbing him in the back like Brutus did. Antony is able to prove to the people that he is an honorable man as he did not go against Caesar and was a true friend to him. He relies on repetition as a way to get his point across and facts to counteract Brutus' claims. He states how although Brutus claims that Caesar was ambitious his actions do not prove that to be so as he cared for the poor and treated them with kindness, paid for the ransoms of prisoners, and declined the crown three times in a row, "He hath brought many captives home to Rome/ Whose ransom did the general coffers fill: Did this in Caesar seem ambitious?

Julius Caesar by Shakespeare is the most interesting story we learnt this term. It is juicy because there are huge number of different rhetorical devices in the sentence. Those rhetorical devices include logos, ethos, and pathos which look like the condiments that make the speech in the story logical, credible, and touch reader’s emotion. That’s why people love to read the story once and once more. So it is necessary for us to understand how to make our passage better by using rhetorical devices.

One of the rhetorical appeals that Antony used to sway the crowd against the conspirators was pathos. Pathos is an appeal using emotion. In line 20 Antony begins to use pathos when he states, “Did this in Caesar seem ambitious? When that the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept: Ambition should be made of sterner stuff.” This quote is able to sway the crowd against Brutus and Cassius by showing what kind of good person Caesar was. He was compassionate to people. This quote shows what kind of good leader by helping out the poor. He knew what they were going through so he cried along with them. This quote is able to sway the citizens of Rome because it shows the opposite of what Brutus said about Caesar. If he would

When Antony tells the crowd about how much Caesar loved Brutus he was trying to change the crowds perspective of the type of leader Brutus actually is. In act three Antony says, “How dearly Caesar loved him.” , referencing Brutus the crowd began to get angry at Brutus. Why would someone kill their best friend when the best friend only loved them dearly. The crowd saw this and began to understand where Antony was coming from. Antony using ethos paid off because he was able to change the personnel image of Brutus. Antony uses logos when he brings out Caesar’s will.

Many examples of ethos, logos, and pathos are used throughout both of Antony and Brutus's speech, but it is clear that Atony's speech is more effective. Brutus does completely convince his audience, during his speech , that he was correct but Antony's speech, in the end, dominates Brutus's first use of ethos states , " Believe me for my honor, and have respect to mine honor that you may believe." Brutus is trying to win the people over by reminding them that he is honorable man in hope that this may effect their decisions in his favor. Antony's use of ethos is more effective because he tells the people of all the many good deeds Caesar had done for the people. Antony says, " He hath brought many captives home to Rome Whose ransoms did general coffers fill."

The Roman senators all took part in betraying Caesar by murdering him. One of the main people involved, Brutus, held a funeral service for the deceased Caesar along with a brief speech. One of Julius Caesar's main companions who loved him dearly, Antony, also gave a speech that lasted much longer. After looking through the ethos, logos, and pathos mentioned in this story, it is obvious that Antony is more persuasive.

Ethos logos and pathos was a big part of these speeches. Antony and Brutus used different ones to appeal to the crowed at the funeral. Brutus used more logos. He appealed the audiences with reasoning and logic. He told them why he did it and all the reasons he did. On the other hand, Antony used pathos. He used the crowds emotion to overcome what they were feeling feeling inside. He used the sadness that the Romans had to overcome what he did.

The first Rhetorical Strategy Antony uses in his speech is Ethos. He starts off his speech with establishing a common bond with the people by saying “Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears.” (III.ii.70) By saying this Antony shows signs of False Humility to show that he is equal to all the others among the crowd. Since everyone in the crowd expects Antony to go against Brutus, he makes sure to address that he is not there to praise Caesar. He wants to appeal to the audience and get them to trust him. After telling the people of Rome that he is on their side, they start to open up their ears to Antony and are intrigued with what he has to say. Although Antony claims he is not going to appraise Caesar, he uses Ethical Fallacies and Indirect suggestions to persuade the audience into thinking he agrees with Brutus’ choice when really he thinks Caesar was not capable of being ambitious.

Roman politician and popular figure in the Roman Republic, Mark Antony, uses the rhetorical devices of pathos, logos, and ethos in his funeral oration for Julius Caesar, in order to deem the assassination of Caesar by Cassius, Brutus, and their conspirators, wrong. The speech conducted by Mark Antony, a good friend of Caesar’s, has a sorrowful tone due to the fact that Mark Antony wants the crowds of Romans to agree with him. Antony conducts his speech in such a way to strike pity and regret in the assassinators and conspirators of Julius Caesar. Usage of pathos, ethos, and logos is essential in winning over the plebeians trust and respect.

The speech delivered by Mark Antony in the second scene of the third act of Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar is a controversial, thought provoking statement. At this point in the play, Caesar has been killed by Brutus, Cassius, and the other conspirators. They worried that he would eventually become too powerful, and that his complete rule of Rome would be its downfall. Antony, who loved Caesar, has been allowed to address the people of Rome and speak about who Caesar was and what he represented. Throughout his speech, Antony uses the rhetorical strategies of Ethos, Logos, and Pathos to convince the audience that he is right and his opponents are wrong.

In Julius Caesar, there are two people who fight for the support of the people of Rome after the death of Julius Caesar. Marcus Brutus claims that the death of Caesar was for the good of the people because Caesar had grown too ambitious. Mark Antony claims that the death of Caesar was unnecessary because all Caesar did was protect the people of Rome and build a better and stronger Rome. Although Brutus’ speech was plausible, Antony’s speech was better developed and more persuasive than Brutus. Due to Brutus naivete, he doesn’t realize the closeness that the people of Rome had with Caesar. Antony exploits his naivety to ensure that the people of Rome turned against Brutus.