What Is The Seventh Man Argumentative Essay

I believe that the narrator of “The Seventh Man” should forgive himself for his failure to save his best friend K. it wasn't his fault that his best friend didn't see the wave and didn't move on time. So why would he feel bad about it?

This quote shows that if the seventh man had tried to go back for K, then he would have died too. The seventh man should also forgive himself because he cannot control a natural event. In the article “The Moral Logic of Survivor Guilt” there is an example of an old army captain’s soldier dying. The soldier was killed in a bar fight. Captain Bonenberger felt guilty because he was not there to save him.

Imagine deciding to do something that is completely out of the ordinary--a dream that you have always thought about doing--and it goes perfectly. It’s as if it’s all just a hallucination, so perfect that it’s unrealistic. The experience is breathtaking, impeccable, absolute perfection--until it becomes actually breathtaking. Imagine that during this moment of serenity, tragedy strikes, and you’re left in a battle between life and death. Majority of people would do whatever it took to survive, and in this situation you’re left with only risky decisions. Imagine surviving this catastrophe by yourself until rescue workers come to save you, a blessing. That is until the bill is seen. Luckily, this is just a little scenario, but for many people this is a reality.

When you are in a situation where you have to choose between your life or that of someone else, you should not be held accountable for their death. In The Seventh Man, the narrator decides on his life instead of risking it to save his friend's life. If someone broke into your house and had a gun to your mom's head, would you choose to kill the person who had a gun to your mom's head or let your mom die? If you kill them, then you should not be held accountable. You should not be held accountable if your life is endangered and you need to save yourself.

The seventh man should not forgive himself for not saving K. My point of view is supported by the consequences and actions of what he has done and, not done and by what he states in his story. For example, he said he had the time to go and save K. This means that he just stood in place as he watched his best friend in danger and get swallowed by the giant wave. Additionally, in his story, The seventh man says he knew and felt that the wave was close and coming. Although he may have been in major shock, he could have forced himself to run to his own childhood best friend to save him from the upcoming death. Then again, others may say that this is not the case

The narrator of “The Seventh Man” experiences survivor guilt as an effect of failing to save K.’s life. Many people quarrel over whether the Seventh Man should or should not forgive himself for the actions he took to save K. On the other hand, many events that lead up to K.’s death show the reasonable explanations behind why the Seventh

“Don’t waste the life I’d sacrificed my own for on feeling bad about yourself. We might as well have both lost our lives at this rate. Go see the things I never got to see. Do the things I never got to do.  Life is spent in hesitation and fear is no life at all.” is something along the lines of how I think K would have felt about the situation, given the personality described. In “The Seventh Man”, a short story by Haruki Murakami, the seventh man tells a story about a natural disaster he survived: in which his best friend did not. He summarizes this event and reminisces on how he could have saved K; that is followed by a third person point of view describing the effects this survivor’s guilt has had on the seventh man. Despite his failure to save his best friend, should he forgive himself? The answer is a clear, and obvious yes because by never forgiving himself, not only is he hurting himself and allowing K to die in vain, but he also spreads pain to those who love him like friends, family, and acquaintances. I’m sure by that present point in time; K, his parents, K’s parents, and everyone but himself had succumbed to forgiveness. The only one left to move on is the seventh man himself.

In this essay i will be making a argumentative essay on three stories “The Moral Logic of Survivor Guilt”, “The Seventh Man” and “The Key to Disaster Survival” I will go through each story and say some key events of what happened and how they affected the reader and what the author was trying to get the reader to experience it. The author is trying to get the reader to understand the point of view in first hand and know what is happening right in the story. The first story that we are talking about is “The Moral Logic of Survival Guilt”. Some key events that happen in the story, What it is like to be a survivor and all the feeling and the quilt that they have after the war is over and some of the events that the soldiers have to go through and witness is just terribly. The soldiers have to go through some terrible things and those things stick with those people forever and they have flashbacks on things that have happened to them during the war.

A handful of people will agree that the Seventh Man left K. intentionally and let him die. For example, (evidence). Thus, what killed K. was the “wave like a huge snake with its held wanted him to die” (138). Furthermore, it was impossible for the narrator to save K. because he was “ten yards” away from him. Therefore, if he tried to run up to him and save him both of them could’ve died. In addition, although, the narrator failed on saving K., he was traumatized and had a difficulty moving on with his life. For example, “I was burning with fever, and my mind was clouded… been asleep for three days… vomited several times, and had bouts of delirium… in my dreams, K. would hop out of his capsule in the wave and grab my waist to drag me inside him...I never married… never went to swim in a pool… wouldn’t go near deep rivers or lakes…” (139-141). Others might conclude that the seventh man deserves everything he’s been through. However, this proves that the Seventh Man was miserable and couldn’t live life to the fullest because of the

The narrator of “The Seventh Man” should seek forgiveness in himself. Not only is forgiving yourself an essential thing that keeps our lives going, but in his circumstances, there wasn’t much more to do to help his friend.

During his childhood years the seventh man was very close with his best friend, K. The relationship they shared was like a brotherly bond, the seventh man even claiming it to be stronger than his and his blood brothers. My real brotherly affection went to my friend K (Murakami, 134). It seemed as if the two boys spent every fleeting moment of their childhood together, until the accident of course. The seventh man held K in such a high regard that it makes complete sense how he would feel such remorse over the loss.

This material set-off in this fashion in the handout identifies the revision notation for these matters. Guidelines for the Argumentative/Persuasive Essay

the narrator it was not at all his fault that K had died. He should have been able to forgive himself. A great story to source is “The Moral Logic of Survivor's Guilt.”The story explains what survivor guilt is. “The classic scenario is not so much one of good luck (as in survivors guilt), but of bad luck, typically having to do with accidents where again, there is little or no culpability for the harms caused”(Sherman 154). In the narrator of “The seventh man” case K had tragically died in a typhoon. He felt that it was his fault that K had been swallowed when in reality, if he had tried to save K he would have died himself. There was no way he could have saved K. The narrator should be able to forgive himself for not running after K. It was an accident, peer bad timing though he feels as if it was his fault. Even though the narrator of the story had watched K die, he should have been able to forgive himself because of the simple fact that it was not his

Others may believe the Seventh Man could have tried harder in saving K. by possibly trying to execute an actual rescue. However, once one becomes aware of how difficult it can be for a person to to rescue another and how much courage it can take, his or her opinion may change. In “The Cost of Survival,” an argumentative editorial, the following statement is brought up: “However, arguments against charging for rescue miss an important point. Many rescue workers have lost their own lives saving others.” (The Cost of Survival 127). Most rescue workers are older than the Seventh Man. The fact that rescue workers have lost their lives trying to save others should be enough to alter one’s opinion that the ten year-old boy in “The Seventh Man” should feel guilty for failing to rescue K. At ten years old, if the narrator would have tried rescuing K., his life would probably also be gone.

There are many situations in which people feel like they’re at fault for the death of a loved one, or a good friend. Many of these cases, to this day, involve soldiers who have seen the terrors and tragedies of war, and have watched their companions get killed in the line of fire, while they survived. In the story, “The Moral Logic of Survivor Guilt,” the author, Nancy Sherman, talks about what survivor guilt is, and why some people suffer from it. “The guilt begins an endless loop of counterfactuals- thoughts that you could have or should have done otherwise, though in fact, you did nothing wrong.” (Sherman, 153) Sherman’s statement relates back to “The Seventh Man,” and how the narrator feels guilty for not saving K. even though there was nothing that could’ve been done to help. The Seventh Man has thoughts about what he could have done, and different things he could have said to save K. but in the end, he feels guilty for nothing.