What Leadership Lessons Were Learned From The Everette Simulation?

Decent Essays
Describe in Details Transformational, Transactional Leadership; Differences and Examples
Leadership development is a multi-billion-dollar industry in the United States and Europe. This essay discusses the difference in transformational and transactional leadership styles and provide examples. Transformational leadership is developmental and usually begins with a transactional approach. First, transactional leader's behavior approach is management- by-exception. This leader puts out fires by taking corrective actions to solve the problem. Additionally, he/she uses contingent reward behavior: rewards an employee for doing a good job. Both concepts have proven to be effective. Something as simple as a pat on the back brings about a greater
…show more content…
Describe in Detail the Theories and Terminology that was Discussed in Class and how it was Reflected in the Everett Simulation. Everest leadership and team multimedia simulation is an attempt to help the participants experience and understand team dynamics and leadership. It requires participants to work as a unit, a cohesive entity, collaborating and communicating essential information in order to make effective decisions that will benefit individuals and the group in achieving their goals. The interactive simulation presents the participants with series of complex and difficult decision-making situations, mimicking real life scenarios facing many organizations.
Moreover, the moment you start doing anything at all with another person, you have established a team. It may be as simple beginning a conversation, picking up the phone, brainstorming an idea and you are in teamwork. However, it is about “getting the right people on the bus.” The Everett Simulation taught each participant the importance of building a team by pitting the right people in place. It’s not that the process in itself is complicated, but it’s the logistics of figuring out how many people need to be in a team, in what positions, and most importantly, how to communicate
…show more content…
From the start, NASA faced political pressure to be and stay number one in the space race against the Soviet Union. In addition, the shuttle’s safety overview program was outsourced. As a consequence, communication problems arose. Furthermore, NASA rewrote the safety protocol to include falling debris as an acceptable risk even though engineers found it to be a concern. These engineers were “…shut off from voicing their opinion. Therefore, the lack of communication and risk management were crucial issues that caused the disaster from a team members perception.
Finally, the Columbia Mission Case Study can be utilized to make my leadership strong because I identified some major areas in need of improvement: group think, communication and risk management. My perception of the simulation hat there were bias interpretation, message distortion and uneven communication among the team. On several occasion one team member abruptly interrupted and failed to listen to the others. It is these kinds of communication problems that I would avoid or correct to enhance my leadership
Get Access