What Makes President Franklin D Roosevelt A Good Leader

Imagine walking into the office on a November day and seeing a new commander walk by on the way to his office. He does not exude the military image that is expected from military officers. As talking to co-workers, you hear that this gentleman finished in the lower portion of his West Point class and just a few years ago resigned his commission for a bit instead of being court-martialed for issues associated with his drinking problem. Would you pre-judge this man or wait and see what type of leader he was? The man described is Ulysses S. Grant, General of the Union Army and future President of the United States of America. While General Grant was not a perfect leader, I will argue that General Grant was one of the most visionary and ethical leaders in United States history. Visionary leader. I will discuss how Grant as an ethical leader faced and triumphed over a competing values ethical dilemma and used intellectual courage to change his point of view to help move the country forward after the Civil War. I will also discuss the personal relevance of Grant’s leadership qualities to my leadership abilities.

Although Theodore Roosevelt led by using Intellectual Courage, he held another great attribute of Ethical Leadership. He was the epitome of an Ethical Leader portraying one of our own Air Force Core Values of Service Before Self which is defined as the ability to have professional duties take precedence over personal desires (BCEE,

History is brimming with striking characters. Whether they were honorable or unrepentant in their pursuits, those characteristics were what made them undying, distinctive individuals, from the beginning of written history. Throughout time, there have been innumerable accounts of successful and effective leaders that present the characteristics of a proactive leader. Nonetheless, there have indubitably also been bad leaders in history, such as, those who do not possess the qualities which are needed for a successful, yet effective leader. History is inevitable, and the influences on mankind are unavoidable, be they good or bad, we all inherit the consequences of it.

What is trust? The dictionary meaning of trust is a firm belief in the reliability, truth, ability, or strength of someone or something. The second meaning is, confidence placed in a person by making that person the nominal owner of property to be held or used for the benefit of one or more others. But what can we really define as trust? In this paper, I will discuss how trust is used every day in different situations, how we deal with trust in various relationships, and how we as individuals practice trust within ourselves.

In this book, trust is defined as “one’s willingness to be vulnerable to another based on the confidence that the other is benevolent, honest, open, reliable, and competent.” (page xiii) The author recognizes that trust is complex and dynamic. She views trust as the “lubricant” that greases the machinery of the organization. Trust is particularly important where parties are interdependent, or the “interests of one party cannot be achieve without reliance upon another.” In schools “teachers and principals are

FDR's leadership, as well as the other leaders discussed in our text, are individuals whom are a learning tool for the future. As demonstrated throughout history, leaders and society continually learn from our progress, development, and our continue to evolve effectively. History has taught us that it is wise to learn from our past. In this specific case, learning and teaching ourselves of the traits and leadership that FDR possessed is an important lesson in understanding how leadership evolved to where it stands today. FDR also teaches us about the effectiveness of visionary charismatic leadership, and the impressive obstacles that can be conquered using this specific set of character strengths.

Soaked in sweat, I ran to the library to get a book on a historical leader before they were all gone. I would like to think I found a great leader, but I think one found me. As I was reading a book on great leaders of World War II, I initially focused on American leaders, but Sir Winston S. Churchill seemed fit my exact requirements. Sir Winston S. Churchill was a Visionary and Ethical Leader. In the following pages, I will explain how Winston was a visionary leader and how he used Inspirational Motivation and global diversity to gain advantage during World War II. I will also explain how he critically thought through a gut-wrenching decision by using Dr. Toner’s three Ps in the

One of the vital attributes to being a successful leader is effectiveness in communication. While America was being faced with one of its most challenging periods in history, the Great Depression, 32nd US president Franklin Roosevelt garnered great public popularity through open communication. President Roosevelt used his famous “fireside chats” to reassure the public during the difficult times of the recession (Corbett et al, 765). I think his radio addresses to the American public were a genius idea that put confidence back into the citizens struggling with a failed economy. Roosevelt would explain what was happening and why as well as what was being done to remedy the situation. Generally for most people in troubling or stressful times it is always calming to have more in depth information rather that the “fear of the unknown”. Effective communication is just one of the many great attributes that make Franklin Roosevelt an effective leader.

Trust is an important human connection that is inherent for connection. We have trust from our earliest months that we are alive. However, politics is often seen as a place where trust is carried on the winds. To quote Cesar, “Et tu, Brute.” In politics having too much trust is a person or a system (such as a system with the Roman Empire, or an authoritarian regime), will have you end up like Julius Cesar, dead with the knives of you friends in your back. Many western nations have come a long way from the Roman Empire, and there is both trust and distrust built into the systems.

Trust is something to be earned not given. The leaders of our governments around the world have earned the trust of their countries. proven from gaining their votes during elections. but the trust they have is more than they deserve. Their not so transparent voting system ….

Throughout human history, extraordinary events have often given rise to extraordinary leadership. In the mid twentieth century, this phenomenon was best demonstrated by two unique individuals who rose to international prominence during times of exceptional crisis. Specifically, Winston Churchill’s staunch leadership during the Second World War and John F. Kennedy’s vision and foresight while countering communist expansion across the globe revealed extremely influential philosophies of leadership.

According to Merriam Webster trust is defined as " assured reliance on the character, ability, strength, or truth of someone or something." Examining the past and the future itself, I have come to a realization that trust is the power/strength to believe in yourself without anyone helping you. It’s the ability to believe in yourself. I believe many of us in our life once was told that you can’t do

Trust, is a belief in responsibility, truth, or ability of someone or something; it is also an acceptance in the truth even without evidence or investigation; and a state of being responsible for someone or something (Oxford Dictionary, 2017). Nowadays, trust is becoming more important as we live in a time that is full of uncertainty. However, trust in government and business has a breakdown in the result of the global financial crisis and the collapse of high profile banks, with the failure of government recue plan (Hope-Hailey et al, 2012). The CIPD Megatrends report published in 2013 in the UK claimed ‘ Trust in many organisations is weak – the latest survey findings show that just 29% of employees think trust in senior management is

This critical situation encourages scholars around the world analyze causes of the trust crisis and look for the ways to influence the situation. Caroline J. Tolbert and Karen Mossberger
 (2006) notice, “citizen attitudes towards Government, including trust, are core concerns for democratic governance and public administration”(p. 354). Klijn, E.H., J. Edelenbos, B. Steijn (2010) come to the assumption, that the complicity of governmental function and expectation from the Government makes the issue of trust especially important. “Since uncertainty and complexity in governance networks

“In leadership, there are no words more important than trust. In any organization, trust must be developed among every member of the team if success is going to be achieved.”