What Purpose Should We Trouble Ourselves About The World 's The Moon?

In a way being selfish is what got humans where they are today.The evolution of humans required competition,and aggressive selfishness. We were forced to be selfish and watch our own back, to always put ourselves first in bad situations. This reaction to put ourselves first is natural, it’s in our blood. However, is the very thing that made us so successful as a species the one thing that so easily tears us apart? As humans we have an incredible capacity to dehumanize others to protect our own self interest.

Samuel Butler once said, “Self-preservation is the first law of nature.” This statement could not be more true because self preservation is the greatest human motivator as it grows in power as the world evolves, and establishes all basic humans needs and desires that other motivations lie within. Cynicism is often considered to be a form of skepticism (Cynicism=Self Preservation). However, the belief that all people are motivated by self interest is partially true. Humans are born with a natural desire to protect themselves, protect their image as seen by others, and make their life as fulfilling as possible and there are many examples to showcase it.

Psychological egoism is the interpretation that humans are always inspired by self-interest, even in what seem to be acts of altruism. It claims that, when people choose to help others, they do so ultimately because of the personal benefits that they themselves expect to obtain, directly or indirectly, from doing so. Psychological egoism, which was widely recognized by psychologists and philosophers states that all human actions are motivated by selfish needs to benefit themselves. According to psychological egoists true altruism does not exist because the consequence of such an act leads to an increase in personal happiness. However, Joel Feinberg does not agree with that theory and in his essay he disagreed with the thesis that altruism

As much as anyone would say otherwise self-interest does play a measure in and to some extent can interfere with decision-making. Whether that becomes moral decision-making would depend upon what and who defines that particular moral as right or wrong. As humans we have such a competitive nature built into our makeup it just seems so hard not to have some self-interest. If we look at such things as employment searches, promotions, salary increases any type of lateral employment moves; most people would like to know what’s in it for them. It has manifested itself more clearly as of recent in my opinion as we have navigated through the X Generation, Y Generation or the Millennials to what we have now, which I

Selfishness is defined as the act of being someone who lacks concern for others, only caring for personal gain. Often, people are selfish due to a lack of empathy, misinformation, or a lack of information. The ability of literature to have us experience different worlds through different perspectives is fairly useful for combating this. In fact, literature can shock us about the idea of selfishness and give us pause and new insights into it, if not necessarily cause us to realize our own lack of selflessness and shock us out of it.

Ethical Egoism is a normative theory which focuses on individualistic consequences (Burgess-Jackson, 2013). Everyone is said to be motivated by their own self-interest, as it is their moral obligation to do what is best for themselves (Rachels, 2003). How an individual ought to behave is determined by whether the action creates the highest net utility for themselves (Rachels, 2003). In Thomas

The purpose Ban Ki-moon is trying make is that genocide needs to come to an end. Bank Ki-moon supports his piece by saying this is not the way young people should grow up, my evidence is in paragraph 18, where he says "We now have a whole generation of young people on both sides who risk growing up with a demonized, dehumanized-and utterly false-concept of their neighbors." What he says tells us that we need to think about what it will do to our youth and how will it affect them. The point of view in this story is first person point of view. The writer helps us identify that by the text for example, in paragraph 47, he says "I met refugees last month, in camps in Jordan and Turkey." In the text when he says the word "I", it tells me that

It is however possible for ethics and self-interest to find a common ground. As humans we are naturally benevolent. We care about the welfare of others--especially of those closest to us. Without close relationships we can never truly be happy. According to the American psychologist A.H. Maslow,

Opportunism is the conscious policy and practice of having/taking selfish advantage of circumstances in a particular person at different motifs. Although human opportunism often has a strong negative moral connotation, it may also be defined more further as putting self-interest before the other interests when there is an opportunity, or flexibly adapting to changing circumstances to maximize self-interest. It is the love for ourselves than having any greater/better intimate connection to others. Opportunism is sometimes also defined as the ability to capitalize on the mistakes of others, to take opportunities created by the errors, weaknesses or distractions of opponents to one's own advantage and disregarding the disadvantages to others. Opportunist people can make the most gains for themselves at the least cost to themselves, time to time the opportunist has a win to win situation. They’re relevant internal or external controls on their behavior are absent. And they are pressured to choose and act the things they wanted for the good of themselves.

On the other hand, ethical egoism is a theory that prescribes moral obligation, where all people should be motivated out of self interest (Rachels, 2003, p. 70). This means that every person ought to act in a way that is best for him/herself. Ethical egoism claims that it is moral for all of an individual’s actions to be based on self-interest, without concerning him/herself with the interests of others. In fact, this thought may be continued by stating that altruism is, therefore, personally hindering and even demeaning (Brink, 1997, p. 122). Hence, ethical egoism must consequently mean that actions taken in an individual’s self-interest are moral actions, and actions taken that are not self-beneficial to an individual are immoral and should, as a result, be avoided.

Ethical egoism claims that all our actions can be reduced to self-interest. This is a controversial moral theory which sometimes can be detrimental. Without a well-defined framework of the nature of self-interest, ethical egoism enlarges the animalistic nature of humanity in which can result in unfavorable consequences. Ethical egoism also fails to provide a solution when a conflict of interest arises. By only acting out of one’s self

The theory of psychological egoism is indeed plausible. The meaning of plausible in the context of this paper refers to the validity or the conceivability of the theory in question, to explain the nature and motivation of human behavior (Hinman, 2007). Human actions are motivated by the satisfaction obtained after completing a task that they are involved in. For example, Mother Teresa was satisfied by her benevolent actions and activities that she spent her life doing. As Hinman (2007) points out, she was likely to reduce in activity if she experienced any dissatisfaction in her endeavors.

Ethical egoism requires that for an action to be moral it must maximize one's own self interest

As the human race gazes upon the stars, it finds that its natural instincts to explore, possess, and mold become illuminated. The real question for the human race is not whether to explore but what to possess in the Solar System first? Whether man should first colonize Mars, Venus, or Earth’s Moon is the real question for the human race because a successful first attempt would directly influence life on Earth economically and politically for generations. If a successful colonization mission can be achieved in the first attempt, it would directly result in increased funding for space programs across the globe. The debate is between these three surfaces for the reasons that these surfaces are closer than other entities in the Solar System and the surface of these entities are solid enough to land equipment and Astronauts. The Moon is the most plausible of all the surfaces, because it is closer than any other entity, has resources that would fund the expedition, more hospitable, and the Moon has more of a history with mankind’s culture. Sometimes the best deals are spoiled by the distance one must travel to get it.

Selfishness surrounds us in everything we do because it is human nature to be selfish. Without selfishness we would not be able to take care of ourselves and ensure that we are fed and all our needs are fulfilled. Many people and the surrounding environment suffer because of selfishness but without it the reality