What Standards Serve The Purpose Of The American Consensus In The 21st Century

The Constitution should change with society. Like all societies, ours changes with time. Like it or not, things will be different in the future. Although we agree with things we are doing now, we may not in the future. Our constitution is ment to be part of a lasting government in the land of the free. If the USA really wishes to be held up to that title, its people must be able to agree, and if needed, change the Constitution.

The United States Constitution is set up for democracy like the colonist wanted. The constitution prevents anarchy and protects your rights. As a citizen you are protected by the Bill of Rights. We are entitled to freedom of speech, religion, and have dual process. We have guaranteed rights, separated powers of government to prevent tyranny, and we elect our representatives under The United States Constitution. The United States Constitution is set up to keep up with changing times.

They were a few shortcomings and advantages in the new government under the Articles of Confederation I would like to discuss. First of all the weaknesses that articles of confederation have gone through were certain people in the congress lacked leadership, could not tax, there militia or military was small, and one vote per state. The advantages they had were that they could borrow money and make peace also sign treaties. There were several sentiments and ideas. The “new vision want to make political authority legitimate and secure liberty” (Wilson, 2008, p.20). The system of government was established by articles to respect liberties given to them. Founding fathers replaced the document because certain states used the document for different

The ability of The Constitution to be amended is what still allows it to be relevant today. The updates that are made reflect the attitude of the nation. An example of this being the

The Constitution is a living, breathing document. It was recognized that each future generation would be facing new challenges that would have never occurred to the older ones, so it had the flexibility available by both interpretation and revisement to allow the newer generation to use the document as it was intended. As society and government grows, additions must be made to the Constitution to keep with the times. The Constitution is also governed by the thoughts of society at that time, seen in the implementation of the 18th amendment because of the urgings of religious and Women’s Suffrage movements. As it is also seen when the government grows weary of one president in office too long, seen in the creation of the 22nd amendment.

Since this is an opinionated examination, I group myself as an Originalist. I trust that we ought to translate the Constitution indistinguishable today from when it was first composed. Originalism is championed for various principal reasons. To start with, it comports with the way of a constitution, which ties and restrains any one era from decision as indicated by the enthusiasm of the times. The Framers of the Constitution of 1787 recognized what they were about, shaping an edge of government for "ourselves and our Posterity." They didn't comprehend "We the general population" to be only a collection of people at any one point in time however a "people" as an affiliation, in reality various covering relationship, through the span of numerous

Although weak and difficult, the central government could pass legislature in an organized manner, which was a massive starting point for the new nation. This starting point is what eventually led to the new Constitution, but at the time it did help with problems they faced. Another good reason for creating a weak central government and strong state governments was it caused the new nation to move away from the traditional British form of government, which helped unite the states even more. Overall, the Articles of Confederation helped the problems that first arose, such as the necessity for a central government, the necessity for a strong state run government, and a means to enact

The U.S. Constitution was written in 1787, and even though it was made so long ago, it still serves as the basic framework for our country today. It has lasted with only twenty-four Amendments made to it in the past 228 years; an amazing feat in within itself, considering that the first ten were made within the first five years of having the Constitution and two others cancel themselves out. As well as the large changes made in formal Amendments, there are also small changes made that redefine these words. There are court cases that have arisen in the past and continue to rise up today that can lead to both major change and just tweaks to the rules and principles delegated by the Constitution.

The creation of a government takes time and goes through many failures and successes. The Articles of Confederation, while being the first attempt at a new government fails by trying to keep revolutionary ideals, but not giving the national government enough power. With the Articles failing a new national government was needed. The Constitution was created to fix the failures of the Articles, but this was a gradual process, the state representatives creating it looked towards the past, by putting in revolutionary ideals, to build it.

It addressed the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation in several ways. It gave Congress enumerated powers such as the power to raise taxes. It contains clauses such as the Necessary and Proper clause which gives Congress the power to create laws necessary and proper to enact enumerated powers and the General Welfare clause which allows Congress to create laws for the well0being of its citizens. The Constitution also fixed the issue of the states having more power than the central government. The solution was Federalism which divided the power between the central government and the states.

The U.S Constitution is a remarkable work, one of the greatest declarations of liberty and law in human history. It has survived as the law of the land for 227 years, but things have changed quite a bit since then. The interpretation of this document has led to much controversy over the years. Should the Constitution be modified to fit more present day ideals?

The Constitution is meant to be a living document, one that changes and adapts to the ideals of the generations following the original Framers. This is evidenced by the Nineteenth Amendment which guarantees that American women have the right to vote. During the eighteenth century allowing women to vote would have been unheard of but as the country’s views changed, the Constitution changed with it. Article V of the Constitution addresses amending the constitution and the ratification of said amendments.

Even though I understand your point of view, I still believe the Constitution should be flexible and changed. As society changes, the interpretation of the constitution changes, this is as a result of the broad language used in the constitution. The structure does not necessarily mean the same when the people first adopted it in late 1780's. Therefore, some contents of the constitution that do not benefit the citizens nor the government needs to be reversed or updated. The interpretation of the constitution changes, this is as a result of the broad language used in the constitution. For instance, the right for people to bear arms in the second amendment has evolved over the years. Now there is a bigger debate on whether people should be

When the founding fathers crafted the Constitution I believe they intended it to be a starting point by which we would build a successful and sustaining society. The core values that were and are enshrined within the Constitution still exist. What has changed since its inception however, are the types of issues and challenges the nation has faced, both then and now. This is not the first time, Legislators or the Supreme Court has had to intervene on behalf of a specific portion of the population in order to ensure that those core values could be applied to all not just equally, but, equitably. It is not just the duty, but the responsibility of the elected officials to re-interpret a law that would in some way violate the rights citizens.

Overall the Constitution is very outdated. The amendments that might’ve been effective back then need to be revised to make them fit today’s society. You could argue that most of them don’t need to be refined. For example, our freedom of the press, speech and religion. However, I believe that by modifying the amendments can construct a safer and more successful country.