What The Data Does Show Our Company Gpa Guidelines Are Hampering The Hiring Process Of Valuable Candidates?

With college admissions relying so highly on these tests many bright and capable students are getting left with little options (Sternberg 7). These students are facing this because the ACT and SAT primary focus on a narrow segment of skills that are needed to become a person that makes significant differences to the world (Sternberg 7). College’s argue that the admission test give them a quick glimpse of what the students potential is because they do not have to time to individually evaluate each potential student. This may be true but we need a better way to distinguish a person’s abilities than just a simple score on a test.

The solid set of skills I have amassed through my volunteer, professional and academic career all have equipped me with the drive, work ethic, and capability to succeed in law school. I wholeheartedly believe that the University of Windsor, with its unique focus on research, providing a broader perspective on the legal process and theory, is the school that I can meet my full potential. And more importantly, the legal education offered at the University of Windsor will prepare me to fully and effectively act as both an advocate and advisor to any client or entity I go on to

Motivation is important because it allows you to work towards and complete your goals. GPA allows you to see, on average, how well a student has performed in all classes they have taken. It is likely there is a relationship between motivation and GPA. If a student is highly motivated, will their GPA rise? Based upon previous research, it is hypothesized that students who are highly motivated will have a GPA of 3.0 or higher. Seventeen university students, 9 male and 8 female participated in the survey. The survey included 9 questions that measured motivation, measured on a Likert scale from 1-5. [Results].

Albert Einstein once said, “Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.” I’ve seen this today, where students are these fish, and these standardized tests that we take are the judges at how well we climb up the tree.

Curriculum-based tests shouldn’t determine the intelligence and knowledge of people but instead, it is

Utilizing standardized tests as a tool to test the knowledge of students outlines only a small portion of an individual's performance and creativity. The environment of the situation, creates an immense amount of stressors, such as time limits, the anxieties of doing well, or the endless pressures that the test can determine a student's future. Each individual comes with vast amounts of different abilities in which a single test cannot possibly account for all. Although the tests attempt to provide an evaluation of the student’s test taking skills, many students are smart, but it simply doesn’t show on the test due to the unaccountable external forces. In other words, there is an avoidance of the external forces, which limits the student’s proficiency because only the standard reading, math, and writing become strictly tested upon. One external force which hinders performance is that standardized testing evaluates a student’s efficiency only on that particular day, which does not account for other performances throughout the student’s overall growth. Consecutively, the students face frightening outcomes and unrealistic intelligence techniques that regulates a student's

College admission exams don't show the overall aspect of a person’s talent and is detrimental to society if having wealth effects these scores. Henceforth, these standardized tests should either be made optional by colleges or be revamped to give all students ways of advantages such as including dictionaries, the web, and no time limits. If "standardizing" these tests fail to provide an indication of success, opening up to a variety of ways to display the intelligence students do possess should provide enough information for colleges to grant their admissions and that they are indeed intelligent in an

Many prospective graduates naturally contemplate employment in advance of passing the Florida Bar examination, especially when it conceivably involves an extended duration of time. Be that as it may, hiring procedures virtually guarantee case-by-case decisions corresponding to current market conditions and an organization’s specific policies. Newly minted law school graduates must understand employer expectations devoid of erroneous assumptions and misunderstandings. Consequently, passing the Bar examination must unequivocally remain the highest priority upon graduating law school with everything else falling into place after that. In the worst-case scenario, our prospect could expect a gap between graduating and their approaching hire as a

Analyzing jobs for an effective performance management framework, measuring employee’s skills and skill gaps should be properly measured. Job design is dependent upon the analysis of the job and the

The author also said that there’s a coloration between high performance on standardize testing and low perception skills. I find this very true because the more concrete and ridged an education system is, the less room there is for nontraditional skills such as creativity and critical thinking.

An anonymous author once stated, “Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.” The same idea holds true when it comes to standardized testing. A student with testing anxiety, dyslexia, poor comprehension, or slow paced thinking skills should not be tested on his or her ability to take a limited subject, timed test. Upon receiving test results, only two outcomes are possible; instead of believing in improvement, students will either become discouraged or set in cruise control (Jouriles, 2014). Along with that, a majority of students will not look to expand their knowledge on the subjects after the tests conclude, being as the tests do not coincide with any of Gardner’s multiple intelligences. Howard Gardner, a Harvard professor believed that humans were comprised of eight distinct intelligences, which allowed them to be stronger and spark interest in some areas over others (McDevitt & Ormrod, 2010). Gardner believed in Linguistic, Logical-Mathematical, Spatial, Musical, Bodily-Kinesthetic, Interpersonal, Intrapersonal, and Naturalist Intelligences, but out of the reading, writing, science, and mathematics that the MCA’s test students on, only one subject area coincides with Gardner’s discovery (McDevitt & Ormrod, 2010). How are students expected to contribute their hard work and effort, when they are being tested on their weaknesses rather than their strengths? Gardner was able to realize the differences between individuals; he saw how much more there was to a human. Unfortunately, test makers have not come to that realization, for they fail to include subjects such as music, art, language, social studies, history, mechanics, and environmental studies. Until standardized test creators make an attempt to obtain a well rounded evaluation of the individual

8). Most audience members expect a sense of realism, which means that the story should feel as if it could actually happen in the world (8). Both The Paper Chase and Legally Blonde attempt to offer a realistic view on what law school is like, and do an excellent job at it the mistake in blind grading. Movies like The Paper Chase and Legally Blonde (2001) and televsion shows like Suits, How I Met Your Mother and How to Get Away With Murder offer the public and prospective law student an inside view of what law school involves as a first year, from the amount of hard work that is involved in and outside the classroom preparing for the final exam, to how students spend their extra time. Hart and Elle, both manage to do well in classes as well as maintain an active social life be it a girlfriend or an intensive internship, respectively. According to real law students at elite universities, “on most days I find myself spending a few hours in the classroom, a few more hitting the books, and the rest doing whatever I please” (Yale Law School, 2010). Real law students express how they have managed academics, extracurricular activities and an active social life just like Hart and Elle. Evidently, law school is not all work and no

Despite the small sample, the data does show our company GPA guidelines are hampering the hiring process of valuable candidates. The far-reaching, undesirable impact of our high GPA hiring guidelines, may be positively influenced by purposeful communication and making some changes in order to have a more diverse, well-rounded and experienced workforce. These changes will allow our company to be distinct and competitive in our support of exceptional service in the national interest.

Colleges select students in order to create a diverse environment that fosters people who will contribute to society. In order to do so, college admissions must consider many factors. Admissions should focus most of their attention on GPA and extracurricular achievements. While standardized tests should not be highly considered, ethnicity and socioeconomic identity should still play a small factor in the process. Some people like Suzy Lee Weiss argue that academics should be the sole factor in determining a student’s eligibility for college acceptance. Extracurricular activities and personal achievements are ways to represent that a student possesses necessary skills like valor, teamwork and time management. Although standardized test scores

Job analysis can provide a realistic job preview about what the job will be and therefore reduces early employee dissatisfaction and turnover (Fisher et al., 2003). Job analysis is also important for the assessment of job performance in for example 360 degree feedback since a job analysis can set performance criteria. In this feedback subjective measures are used which are vulnerable to measurement rating errors like halo-effects (Viswesvaran, Schmidt & Ones, 2005). Nevertheless, subjective measures might be very useful to assess organizational effectiveness, especially in relation to HR practices since subjective measures are mainly used to assess HR or organizational outcomes which are more directly related to HR practices (Dyer & Reeves, 1995). Objective measures involve actual percentage figures for sales growth or profitability which measure financial and capital market outcomes and these are more distal and indirectly related outcomes (Dyer & Reeves, 1995).