What They Did Wrong: Malpratice in the Medicial Field Essay

In the Code of Ethics for Nurses provision 4 states “The nurse has authority, accountability, and responsibility for nursing practice; makes decisions; and takes action consistent with the obligation to promote health and to provide optimal care.” This was not done, there was no regard for human life. The patients in the hospital were treated as a burden. A meeting was held where the doctors agreed that

Medical malpractice lawsuits are an extremely serious topic and have affected numerous patients, doctors, and hospitals across the country. Medical malpractice is defined as “improper, unskilled or negligent treatment of a patient by a physician, dentist, nurse, pharmacist, or other health care professional” (Medical malpractice, n.d.). If a doctor acts negligent and causes harm to a patient, malpractice lawsuits arise. Negligence is the concept of the liability concerning claims of medical malpractice, making this type of litigation part of tort law. Tort law provides that one person may litigate negligence to recover damages for personal injury. Negligence laws are designed to deter careless behavior and also to

The two provisions from the Nursing Code of Ethics that were violated are Provision 2 and 3. Provision 2 states “the nurse’s primary commitment is to the patient, whether an individual, family, group, community, or population” (Brown, Lachman & Swanson, 2015). Provision 2 focuses on “the nurse’s obligation to assure the primacy of the patient’s interests regardless of conflicts that arise between clinicians or patient and family”(Brown, Lachman & Swanson, 2015). Provision 2 was violated because the nurses

Medical malpractice, is misconduct that usually involves failing of a physician to follow a standard of care, which results in harm to a patient.

Physicians swear by the code primum non nocere, Latin words for, “first do no harm” (Pozar, 2014). In the video, the resident physician clearly did not follow protocol when she administered the drugs. The intent was good, however, the risk involved with administering a drug without the patient’s medication history and possibly causing death it too great. This is especially true knowing the patient already had severe reactions to other narcotics (morphine) during a previous hospitalization. Furthermore, the doctor was a resident physician, thus still in training, not the attending physician, so the resident physician lacked the experience needed to make the appropriate calls during that critical situation. The actions taken by the resident physician were unethical, of poor judgment, and violates the Hippocratic Oath.

The nurses Mitchell and Galle, while working in the Quality assurance department of the hospital found issues with Dr. Arafiles practice that clearly jeopardized patient safety. The nurses possessed an ethical obligation to report the malpractice, moreover, if the reporting of what is presumed to be illegal behavior is performed in good faith then the action is legal per the Texas Supreme Court (Sack, 2010).

The doctor is out of line to insist that Greg is not capable of making the medical decision to decline service. Both doctor and nurse have not fully communicated to the patient or his family the importance of the procedure. The resident and the nurse should not argue with one another in the hospital. This is a negative relationship. Disrespectful behavior by doctors toward nurses adversely affects the healthcare environment (as cited in Siedlecki & Hixson, 2015). Doctors and nurses are the largest group of professionals in the healthcare setting; therefore, they impact quality patient care (Siedlecki & Hixon, 2015). Hospital leaders should not tolerate harsh treatment from doctors. Hospital leaders should have a system in place to discipline such actions as well (Siedlecki & Hixon,

Without doctors order nurses can perform procedures and makes decision related to patient care” (p. 115). Sherita Johnson and Daria Kring (2012) stated, “That the teamwork between nurses and physicians is important in providing improved patient care outcomes” (p. 343). When Nurse Jackie reported to the doctor that she suspected the patient was bleeding from the brain, he ignored her request for a scan and told her he knew what he was doing. The doctor should have listened to her request because Nurse Jackie was the one working directly with the patient. As a result of the doctor ignoring Nurse Jackie, the patient died of subdural

The case under discussion is as follows. A nurse witnesses a colleague perform a procedure on a patient with out the patients’ prior consent. The main issues involved with this discussion come under civil law the law that nurses must work within the context of, such as, patient safety; enforcing

In the postoperative period the patient answered questions relating to his history and didn’t have any questions or concerns about the surgical process. The consent form was witnessed and signed and hand off was given to the circulating nurse. In the intraoperative period the surgeon described what he was doing and we were able to witness it on a surgical screen throughout the procedure. Within 15 minutes the surgeon diagnosed this patient with crystalloid disease and pseudo gout, which lead to his meniscus issues and also removed the lateral meniscus (Ignatavicius & Workman 2016). He then proceeded to stitch up the open area on the patient’s knee. Once the surgery ended it was time for us to return to post conference so we were unable to observe the last postoperative

Medical malpractice often results in a variety of ill-effects. In addition to the physical ramifications of questionable medical care, the financial costs can be especially steep for both the patient in question as well as society at large. The following facts illustrate

Shauna, I agree with your argument. The nursing staff definitely did not advocate for the patient’s rights. Instead of thinking about the wishes of the patient, the staff were stubborn in their ideas and sense of ethics. It is questionable as to why did doctor ignored the request to stop resuscitation and continued to coerce the patient’s guardian into allowing the procedure. It appears there was an incident before this video that caused the staff to act in this way. Perhaps the healthcare staff had connected personally with the patient and did not want her to die. Even if this was the case, I agree that the staff did not practice appropriate clinical judgement. They should not have let their emotions and thoughts influence their behavior in

An older woman in her 60s came in complaining of stomach pain. Donna was the one taking care of her, and when she went in to get vitals, she said I should probably stay in the nurses station because the lady wasn’t very friendly. That was probably a first indicator. I don’t know the specifics of what was wrong with her, but I knew she was really sick and needed treatment. She started getting antsy though, and wanted to leave. She kept trying to pull out her IV so Donna asked one of the nurses to stay in her room and sit with her to make sure she didn’t pull it out. Shortly after there was screaming. The woman was yelling that she refused treatment and demanded she leave. Donna went in for backup while I stayed and watched from a distance. Her daughter had dropped her off and left to go home and take care of her baby, so even if she wanted to leave she couldn’t. The yelling continued until Donna came out and explained the situation to the doctor. He said that they had to section-21 her so she could not leave the hospital, then Donna called a Code 22, which means there is a violent patient and calls all available staff to come help. They called the nursing manager and most of the nurses. They restrained her and were able to put an IV back in her arm. It sounds a bit cruel but without treatment the woman probably would have gotten even worse. All the nurses looked quite stressed out after that, and on top of that the other man was screaming

Malpractice is defined by three components: recognize that care was not met, harm has been done to the patient, and that harm was a result of the failure to meet the standard of care (Berlinger, 2005). The IOM specifies what is considered a medical error; physicians who ignores the procedures that are meant to protect patients from errors, or physicians who perform procedures for which they are not trained in and do not perform the procedure the properly. These medical errors lead to malpractice.

Doctors are healers; they have the ability to cure diseases and save lives. To acquire such ability, one must not only have to go through rigorous trainings, but also have to sacrifice at least a decade and take on an incredible amount of debts. There is a double standard in the world of medicine. Patients are glad and respect their doctors when they are treated; however, the doctors are viewed as evil and incompetent when procedures went unexpected. Patients often fail to realize that doctors are also humans; thus, errors are unavoidable even in medicine. Unsuccessful procedures deliver misfortunes and pains to the patients. In addition, they also bring fear to the doctors knowing that malpractice lawsuits are the ultimate consequences for their mistakes. As reported by the article Malpractice Risk According to Physician Specialty published in The New England Journal of Medicine, the chances of facing malpractice claims increase dramatically for doctors who practice in high-risk specialties, such as surgery and obstetrics, compared to those that practice low-risk specialties, such as family medicine (Jena, Seabury, Lakdawalla, & Chandra). In comparison to other specialties, becoming a surgeon requires significantly more training, yet the rate of malpractice claims are notably higher. The high risk of getting sued for surgeons seems counterintuitive, which raises an alarming question: What factors contribute to the soaring malpractice lawsuits in surgery?