What Types Of Rituals Did The Persians Model Their Government After

Alexander should deserve his title as “Great” because he was a strategical and intelligent leader supported by the many battles he has won. The famous philosopher Aristotle taught Alexander which would support how Alexander was so intelligent; he was taught by one of the most intelligent people at that time in history. Alexander was merely 14 when he began to fight in his father’s army, 18 when he was general, and 20 when he became king. (Doc. 1) He had about six years of learning strategies and military tactics from his father, who took over Greece. In battles, he was heavily outnumbered but managed to still win each one. (Doc. 1) Each battle he won slowly expanded his empire until it reached from Greece to India (Doc. 3) In battles, Alexander led from the front of his army, inspiring his men to fight and to not be afraid. (Doc. 6) This movement from Alexander created a sense courageousness throughout the army if Alexander was not

Alexander the Great adopted the cultures of the people he conquered. He did by becoming an example of one of the nations he conquered which was Persia. Alexander began to dress like a Persian king, instead of the simplistic Macedonian ruler, which angered many of his soldiers. He also urged his men to marry women from different cultures which also angered his soldiers. Alexander also spread the various cultures throughout his empire. He did this because he wanted to show respect to those he conquered.

After Alexander ravaged through Persia and North Africa, something was left behind. After he tricked cultures into thinking he was their leader, and attracting the Persians with his strict but ordered principles, something was left behind. Through conquest and curiosity Alexander the Great spread his ideas and customs, and what he left behind was a multitude of coexisting cultures. Conquest forced some of the cultures cultures to coalesce while deceit allowed others to mix. Alexander the Great brought new Grecian ideas to Persia and left behind a medley of Persian and Greek world views in his

(p.552) With this in mind, Alexander’s motivation to

Alexander had extreme ambitions of greatness, he was able to accomplish more in his short life than most men did throughout their entire lives (“Lined with Gold”). By always striving to achieve more, Alexander gained many different peoples trust building a very vast and powerful empire. Being able to achieve many things for your empire shows that you care about the way your people live, this shows heroism because you think about your people before your mind wanders to yourself! “Some people would say… that Alexander was a villain because he only cared about himself succeeding and would do anything to make it happen. In their minds Alexander had a cocky mindset and was abusive to many of his advisors (“Alexander the Great: Hero or Villain?”). It was also believed that Alexander never took the time to rebuild the lands he conquered (Maxwell 3). This could be interpreted that Alexander didn’t give a care in the world about what went on as long as he was conquering others. Overall, what someone does can be interpreted in many different

He appointed Persian governors to rule territories and allowed the persian people to continue practicing religious beliefs. Alexander conquered much of Greece and as king, wanted to merge the best aspects of both the western and eastern worlds.

The Persians were motivated by revenge, while the Greeks were motivated by just defeating this bigger enemy. The Greek’s motivation was a better thing to be motivated by the Persian’s motivation. The Battles In around 500 BCE, Ionia (Under Persian control) rebels against the Persians, with the help of the Athenians and the Eritreans. In 492 BCE, Darius I sent a fleet to get revenge on the Athenians, the fleet went up the Aegean Sea and got to the Xerxes Canal (green route).

Although written documents display the ugly side of Alexander’s rule, his apt for focusing on goals, acceptance of new cultures, and excellent military strategy all prove Alexander the Great deserving of that title. The combination of these three aspects made him a skillful leader that was well-aware of the means that would get him to success. He was successful in using this combination as he expanded his empire into one of the largest seen at that

In the ancient world there have been several leaders that brought immense glory to their empires but there was one particular leader that marked his legacy on much of the known world at that time. He was Alexander the Great: King of Macedonia, Pharaoh of Egypt and Lord of Persia. Alexander had become the King of Macedonia in 336 BC after his father’s assassination. He led his army to victories across the Persian territories, Syria, Egypt and to some extent India without suffering a single defeat. During his 13 years of reign, Alexander had conquered many empires and leaders in the years to come but, nobody was able to live up to Alexander’s legacy. He was generous to people who surrendered and merciless to

Before a man can lead an army to victory, he must know his men; and his men must trust him. Not only was Alexander was a man of his people but they sure did trust him. He believed he could do anything and take over any nation he wanted. “There is nothing impossible to him who will

He could be generous towards defeated enemies and extremely loyal towards his friends. As a general, he led by example, leading from the front and giving orders that had results. Alexander’s reign illustrates a number of important leadership lessons which remain applicable to business and political chiefs today. For example, Alexander had a vision and his collective imagination won the commitment of his followers. Alexander not only had a compelling vision, he also knew how to make that vision become reality. By maintaining an excellent information system, he was able to interpret his opponent’s motives, pinpoint their moves, and was a master at coordinating all parts of his military. No other military leader before him ever used speed and surprise with such talent. Alexander set the example of excellence with his leadership style, he led his troops literally from the front and when his troops went hungry or thirsty, he went hungry and thirsty, and when their horses died beneath them and they had to walk, he did the same. He also knew how to encourage his people for their excellence in battle in ways that brought out their greater excellence and helped boost their ego. He often singled people out for special attention and recognized acts of bravery performed by former and fallen heroes, making it clear that individual contributions would be recognized. Being “the man with a

Alexander the Great was famous for his success in battle; for conquering city upon city, and thus for creating such a huge empire which was larger than any empire the world had ever seen at the time. He was an incredibly talented man, who had the strength, strategy, and audacity to lead an army, yet he had the wisdom, personality and know-how to govern an empire. However, amidst all the glory and praise to which Alexander is often given, there is a good deal to criticise as well.

Elements of the Persian, Rome, Greek, Chinese and Indian Empires Within the Persian, Rome, Greek, Chinese, and Indian empires there were many similarities that they shared. During this time, there had been many territory disputes and new routes had been established. This had allowed for “the emergence of far more elaborate, widespread, and dense networks of communication and exchange that connected many of the world’s peoples to one another” (pg.91 Strayer). Due to the new-found connection of multiple empires techniques and goods could be spread as well as cultures.

Leadership of Alexander the Great “Noble indeed was his power of inspiring his men, of filling them with

Alexander made decisions with great speed and took extraordinary risks; his success was achieved by his show of sheer force and audacity to overcome. His opponents and state himself as a true conqueror and great king of his time