What Was The Case About?

In the legal and illegal use of firearms, some ways of obtaining and the selling of guns are shocking and others are well known. Children, teens, and adults all have ways to obtain a firearm even if they are underage or do not pass a mandatory back-ground check, which causes

Casey Anthony is an Ohio-born and Florida-raised woman that had a daughter named Caylee Anthony be born on August 9, 2005. In the summer of June 2008, following a major argument with her parents, Cindy and George Anthony, who were questioning her suitability as a mother figure, Casey left her parents’ home with Caylee. Over the next couple of weeks, Cindy kept reaching out to Casey concerned about both her and Caylee’s whereabouts. Every time Casey was inquired about Caylee, she would report that Caylee was out under the care of her nanny, Zenaida Fernandez-Gonzalez. Nothing seemed amiss until July 13, 2008 when George and Cindy received a notice that Casey’s car was currently being held in a tow yard. Upon their arrival to pick up the car,

In order for the respondent, which was a local student at his school; to get his case dismissed he would have to prove that either he recently moved with interstate commerce or that he had some sort of tie to interstate commerce. In order for the court to uphold the respondents claim that 922(q) is justified because the possession of the firearm in a local school zone does indeed substantially influence interstate commerce, they would have to have the Supreme Court pile conjecture upon conjecture in an approach that would suggest reasonable to convert congressional Commerce Clause authority to a general police authority of the nature possessed only by the States.

Brock Turner was an above average 19 year-old athlete and student at Oakwood High School in Dayton, Ohio. While in high school, Turner was a three-time All American and was enrolled at Stanford University on a swimming scholarship. He was offered a scholarship to Stanford and he took it without any thought. One thing he never thought about was getting indicted of rape of an intoxicated person, rape of an unconscious person, assault with intent to rape an intoxicated woman, sexually penetrating an intoxicated person with a foreign object, and sexually penetrating an unconscious person with a foreign object. Everything that was just listed, is what he was charged with the night of his felony.

On July 17, 2014, 43 years old black man named Eric Garner was selling loose cigarettes illegally on Staten Island. As the polices approach Erica to make their arrest, he raised both hands in the air and requested for both officers to not touch him. Meanwhile, the second officer came behind Eric and put him in a choke hold in order to restrain the 350 pounds man down to the ground. After he was restrained to the ground both officers roll him over onto his stomach. Within seconds after being roll over to his stomach Erica Garner repeatedly shouted to the police officer, "I can't breathe!", while he was laying on his stomach face down to the sidewalk pavement. Suddenly, the 350-pound black male died of compression of the neck from the officer's

The district court ruled against Mr. Comerford’s claim that the evidence brought against him was unconstitutional. For the purpose of this legal argument, Knotts v. U.S., Kyllo v. U.S, and Katz v. U.S. will be used to suggest to the Court that Comerford had no reasonable expectation of privacy in his evening drug runs, and Smith v. Maryland will be used to prove that there is no expectation of privacy regarding the phone numbers dialed. Together, these two cases prove that the government agents were not conducting an illegal search by tracking Comerfords location using The Chum, and that the evidence gathered by this investigation may be used against Comerford in a Court of law.

When it concerns the economics of gun control, the pro gun control side believe that the loopholes of purchasing a gun illegally are one of the main factors in the crime rates, and that because of this, trace data should be released. One thing both sides may agree on is that there are many flaws in the process of purchasing guns. Around 40 percent of gun owners have not been through a background check. Obtaining guns illegally is not necessarily through a direct purchase of them. Kelly Sampson explained that the two main methods of illegal purchases are the obvious black market, where guns are sold illegally to potential malicious users. However, straw purchasing is another method of obtaining guns illegally, where a person who is allowed to purchase guns, buys a gun with no problem, but later gives that gun to the illegal user. According to ATF director Bradley Buckles, “Virtually every crime gun in the United States starts off as a legal firearm.” However, it is difficult to determine the effect it has on crime due to trace data not being available to the public. This frustration is expressed by Kelly Sampson, who claimed that if the trace

Did the trial court err when it did not deem as admitted facts the allegations made by the Defendant in his Seconded Amended Complaint in accordance with MD Rule 2-323(e), which caused a violation of the Defendant’s fourteenth amendment rights?

Now through undersigned counsel, come Defendant, Lauris Hollis ("Defendant"), who respectfully request that this Court grant their Motion for Summary Judgment dismissing the Plaintiff 's claims against him. Defendant move this Court for a Summary Judgment on the grounds that the Plaintiff has no cause of action, no right of action or no interest in the plaintiff to institute the suit and it should be dismissed.

Under the Gun Control Act of 1968, federal law defined independent sellers as anyone who sold no more than four firearms per year. The 1986 Firearm Owners Protection Act lifted that condition and defined private sellers as people who do not rely on gun sales as a way of making their living. Some states have background checks at gun shows for any sort of gun transaction. According to the Law Center for to Prevent Gun Violence, an estimated 40% of all firearms moved in the United States are transferred by unlicensed individuals. Universal background checks should include all private sales of guns. Federal law does not do enough to protect the citizens because about 96.1% of prisoners purchased a gun through an unlicensed private seller. When private sellers do not run background checks, dangerous people can easily buy a

It's difficult to know, in light of the fact that for about 10 years such firearm follow information has been avoided general society. Indeed, even nearby law requirement had been, as of not long ago, banned from getting to the database for anything other than limited examinations. Thus this not only safeguards the interest of the people but also helps them to ensure their own safety other than the needed one by the state. Under the Gun Control Act of 1968, authorized merchants are required to record certain data about a purchaser and the firearm's serial number at the purpose of offer. At the point when a weapon is recouped from a wrongdoing scene, nearby law authorization offices can ask for The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives to follow the gun's starting points. The recovered data is gathered into a wrongdoing weapon follow database kept up by ATF. An instrument to catch culprits, the database in the mid-2000s turned into a political flashpoint, as the Washington Post subtle elements. Outside research binds seized firearms to a little modest bunch of merchants prodded the government to force harder authorizations and assessments on weapon retailers and makers. (Azrael D et. al,

Lastly, state laws can vary widely depending on the type of gun in question. One type of gun may be prohibited in one area, but allowed in another region. In general, an outright ban on all guns is generally held to be unconstitutional according to the U.S. Supreme Court 's interpretation of the 2nd Amendment, however, gun control laws change frequently in response to current events. National Rifle Association Founded, National Firearms Act, Federal Firearms Act, Gun Control Act, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms created, Law Enforcement Officers Protection Act, Firearms Owners ' Protection Act, Crime Control Act, Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act, Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act, President Obama Proposes Sweeping Changes to Gun Control, Colorado Recalls Pro-Gun Control State Senators are some of the law that has been passed after the second amendment. Violations of gun control laws, such as a straw purchase, usually result in felony charges. A straw purchase is when an actual gun buyer uses another individual to make the gun purchase transaction. Straw Purchase is Illegal because especially it provides firearms to people who are not supposed to have access to them. Federal and state law prohibit making a straw purchase. These are very serious crimes which may result in penalties, including prison sentences for longer than one year, heavy monetary fines, parole or probation periods, and sometimes the complete loss of

Enforcing laws on prohibited gun buyers, is one of the meaningful actions the US-congress should take to reduce future mass shooting. Under current federal law, it is illegal for many categories of people to own guns. Among those owner are: Anyone who is under a constrain order of harassing, stalking, or threatening an intimate partner, and anyone who is a runaway from justice. The duty imposed on others not to sell firearms to prohibited people is weak and easily evaded. In addition, most gun dealers wish to sell lawful owners, most-but not all. In 1995, a researcher analyzed government tracing data and discovered that 1% of gun dealers sold 57% of the weapons found at crime scenes. Moreover, the US-congress should stop gun dealers from selling

Chairmen against illegal Guns 4 Federally-authorized guns merchants (FFLs) must require every buyer to complete ATF Form 4473, which incorporates questions about whether the buyer is denied from purchasing a firearm.14 One inquiry asks whether the individual rounding out the structure is, truth be told, the genuine purchaser of the gun There is no need to steal a gun because people can straw purchase, which is when one may act as the buyer of the gun and then give it to someone else. A straw buyer may be utilized when the real purchaser is denied from having guns, for example, an indicted criminal or a person who is under 21 years old. On different events, the real purchaser of the gun may not be a denied individual, but rather does not need the guns to be recorded in his or her name. There is the possibility of guns owners losing their rights because of regulations forced as a result from criminal use of deadly weapons. I would not say that I am for or against gun control. I believe there should be regulations to an extent, but not when it takes away from citizens who do not abuse

Illegal gun trafficking is one of the more serious effects of the lack of gun control because it seems the United States cannot even keep up with the amount of guns that come in from other countries. The reason there are large amounts of gun trafficking is because the U.S is not capable of finding out where every single illegal gun dealer could be, to the point that gun trafficking in America could become a profession for an individual. An example to show how easy it was to traffic weapons into America would be a man by the name of George Beck Jr., who was “found guilty on June 19 of dealing firearms without a federal license and transferring a firearm to an out-of-state resident”(Montgomery man). So far there is nothing special about him because