What Was The Rationale At Common Law For Making Burglary And Arson Felonies? Essay

The crimes in America have completely spiraled out of control. America has lost its way dealing with all the criminal activity that has taken part in its destruction. America has dealt with the violence and drugs mixed with other criminal activity for many years. The United States government has been troubled by crimes that range from shoplifting to homicide. America has been under debate about the crime of these 50 states, but no action has yet been taken to prevent the spread of dangerous crimes has put many people in body bags and prison.

People have been committing crimes for many centuries, however over time crime punishment changed in different ways. Some of the punishment methods used in one century is found not affective in another century. In England, during the 1600’s crime punishment where hasher and people who were considered criminals did not get many opportunities to be put on trial most time before being sent to face the death penalty. There are many factor that could have contributed to how crime punishment have revolved from the 1600’s all the way to the 1800’s. What were the causes that made the punishments from the 1600’s very different from the ones in the 1700’s and 1800’s? Is it just the different method

Scarce research is available on active offenders due to their unwillingness to corporate with researchers and past and convicted offenders may have changed their perspectives after being convicted or left their lifestyle of crime. The most reliable data on these offenses and their perpetrators may come from active burglars themselves. Richard T. Wright and Scott Decker’s book, Burglars on the Job seeks to explain the reasons why burglars commit the crimes they do. They have taken their research to another level by gaining the trust of active offenders in the St. Louis area and gaining inside knowledge of these criminals’ daily lives and their crimes. This paper will address

This essay will discuss the strengths and weaknesses of sociological explanations of crimes with links to Durkheim’s anomie theory, Merton’s strain theory and the Labelling theory which will draw upon different academics that will highlight these specific areas of research. In sociological terms, crime is a social concept as it does not exist as an autonomous entity, but it is socially constructed by people. It can be analysed that sociological explanations of crime attribute deviance to various aspects of the social environment. For example, crime is strongly related to modern city life where this type of social environment creates cultural enclaves which results in producing criminal or deviant behaviour (Carrabine et al, 2014).

Larceny and Theft is another crime that is similar to robbery, but it is a more serious crime that it is unlawful to take constructive possession of another person’s personal property.

Causes of crime are arguably criminology’s most important and largest research topic. In this process of research, criminologists and academics have used numerous theories in attempts to explain how and why people resort to crime (Ellis, Beaver, Wright, 2009). The purpose of this paper is to examine a case study first with the use of strain theories (ST), followed by social learning theory (SLT). The first section will involve a summary of the case of R v Mark Andrew HUGHES (2009) NSWDC 404 involving an outline of the offender’s personal life, of his crimes, and his punishment handed down by

In the case of Robinson v. California, 370 U.S. 660 (1962), the Supreme Court ruled that a law may not punish a status; i.e., one may not be punished to being an alcoholic or for being addicted to drugs. However, of course, one may be punished for actions such as abusing drugs. The question becomes; What if the status “forces” the action? What if a person, because of his/her addiction to drugs, is “forced” by the addiction to purchase and abuse the illegal drugs? Would punishing that person be unfairly punishing a status?

Burglary is the criminal offense of breaking and entering any dwelling or building illegally with the intent to commit a felony or crime. Under common law in order to constitute the offense the illegal entry should be into the dwelling of another at night. Under the New York statute law burglary can be defined in three degrees. Burglary in the first degree is when the offender knowingly enters or remains unlawfully in a dwelling with intent to commit a crime therein, and when, in effecting entry or while in the dwelling or in immediate flight there from, he or another participant in the crime is armed with explosives or a deadly weapon, causes physical injury to any person who is not a participant in the crime, uses or threatens the immediate use of a dangerous instrument and displays what appears to be a pistol, revolver, rifle, shotgun, machine gun or other firearm. Burglary in the first degree is a Class B felony. Burglary in the second

A person will be charged with robbery when they forcibly take property from another individual, and this charged is upgraded to aggravated robbery if someone is injured during the crime or a firearm is used. Missouri takes this a step further and adds an armed criminal action charge when a weapon is used during a robbery. Any felony committed in Missouri which involves a deadly or dangerous weapon will have this additional charge, which carries with it a sentence of imprisonment for a minimum of three years, upon conviction.In contrast, Kansas considers robbery a level five person felony and aggravated robbery a level three person felony. When no weapon is used during a robbery in Missouri, the individual will be charged with either a class A or class B

The Felony Murder Law of Colorado states that a person is guilty of first degree murder if he or she participates in, or is fleeing from, some other crime and a death results, intended or not2. This statute is the reason a 21 year old Colorado resident, Lisl Auman, was sentenced to life in prison without parole at the Colorado Women's Correctional Facility3. This case has drawn national attention and while appealing her conviction, has gained support from actors Sean Penn, Benecio Del Torro and Johnny Depp and the late writer Hunter S. Thompson.

To continue, the Criminal Law Amendment Act of 1885 hindered the lives of intellectuals in history through the punishments for homosexuality. One such victim of Louberchère’s Amendment was Oscar Wilde. Wilde was an author, playwright, and poet. He was known for “his brilliant wit, flamboyant style and infamous imprisonment for homosexuality” (“Oscar Wilde Bibliography”).

According to our text, the phrase “crimes are statutory offenses” means the government must first establish three thing before convicting a person/ defendant(s) 1. The actions of a defendant(s) are proved to have violated a criminal statute beyond a reasonable doubt. 2. Prove the defendant(s) committed those acts and 3. Prove the defendant(s) had the capacity to form criminal intent or proof of intentional wrongdoing. A given behavior is not a crime unless Congress or a state legislature has criminalized it. Criminal statutes are carefully examined to include only the behaviors specifically prohibited by the relevant legislature. (Mallor, 02/2015, p. 135)

In the final scene when Louis Levy speaks of the capacity of love I feel he is saying that we as humans have this natural need for an emotional attachment in order to feel complete as a person. Everyone on this earth is looking for love and acceptance and this starts from birth. A baby requires love, attention, physical touch and maternal nurturing along with biological needs in order to survive. This is carried on throughout out a person’s life. If one can look back as far as possible into their childhood they will come to find that love from another being is essential to growth because this will be the basis of what kind of adult you will grow

Burglary and robbery are different in many ways, but are the same. Burglary is when a person unlawful entry to a person home or business building to commit the act of theft or a felony. When the action of a burglary is committed by someone, the victim does not have to be present at the time of the incident. (DeMille, 2016). When dealing with building types it can be numerous kind of business offices. Burglary must take place when a person only unlawfully entered your home or building without permission. Depending on the state’s the status of the laws for the offense of burglary can be considered a felony. Robbery is when a person has taken or trying to take something from another person that has value unlawfully by force, intimidation or even threatening that person. Robbery is different from burglary because in order for a person to commit the offense of robbery, a victim must be present at the time of the incident for the crime to occur. Depending on the states and the values of the item that was taken from the victim at the time of the incident the states statues of the laws for the offense of robbery can be considered a felony. (DeMille, 2016). Burglary and robbery are the same in only one category; both are considered to be property crimes.

     Crimes against people include assault, kidnapping, murder, and sexual attacks. Such crimes usually bring severe punishments. Crimes against property include arson, automobile theft, burglary, embezzlement, forgery, fraud, larceny, and vandalism. In most cases, these crimes carry lighter penalties than the crimes set against the person. Robbery is the crime most difficult to classify. The law considers robbery a crime against the person or against the property, according to the case. Robbery may involve simply stealing property from another person, but when a personal encounter occurs between the robber and his victim, it may include violence and bodily harm. This usually occurs during muggings or other strong-arm robberies.