What We Need For Education

Sir Ken Robinson's main point of his TED Talk is that school systems, worldwide, segregate the arts to a lower level of learning. This segregation of the arts in schools drains students of creativity.

Do Schools Kill Creativity? TED is a non-profit organization that serves to present ideas that are worth spreading through strong rhetoric and persuasive appeals. In his eminent Ted Talk, Sir Ken Robinson discusses how public education systems today disregard creativity as an important component within the academic growth of students. Robinson focuses on the importance of creativity by creating a variety of arguments, which persuades the audience to take action upon this heavily ignored issue. His use of pathos, ethos, and logos makes an entertaining case for creating an education system that nurtures rather than undermines creativity. Throughout his speech, Robinson emphasizes pathos by his use of humor and discussion of personal

In the TED talk video "Do Schools Kill Creativity?" by Ken Robinson, his main argument is the lack of focus of art in the education system in favor for activities that rely mainly upon the use of the brain. The stigma against pursuing careers in the arts according to Robinson causes a child to lose their creativity, he states that because of the stigma the child will never discover talents that they may have. The main point in his argument is his criticism of the education system that his striped people out of creativity in focus on an ideal commodity. Robinson states that “So you were probably steered benignly away from things at school when you were a kid, things you liked, claiming you would never get a job doing that. Is that right? Don't do music, you're not going to be a musician; don't do art, you won't be an artist.” Throughout, his speech Robinson uses a variety of ethos, pathos, and logos to get his main point across, that the education system is killing creativity. A big portion of Robinson’s speech relies heavily on humor to help deliver his message that the school system disregards creativity.

Children are no longer encouraged to be creative in the test prep environment. Instead, they are being taught to perform well on standardized tests and are labeled as unintelligent if they don’t. Young children are born with creativity and we see that when they are playing and pretending. According to Sir Ken Robinson, in Slon’s (2013) article, “by the time they get to be adults, most kids have lost that capacity” to be creative. The fundamentals of creation and experimentation are not part of the standardized testing mechanism.

Kaufman and Beghetto (2014) further suggest that creativity can be fostered in children to a certain extent by providing them with opportunities to express their own unique ideas.

Children’s creativity must be extended by the provision of support for their curiosity, exploration and play. They must be provided with opportunities to explore and share their thoughts, ideas and feelings, for example, through a variety of art, music, movement, dance, imaginative and role-play activities, mathematics, and design and technology.

Education has tarnished the idea of an original thought and has caused us to “grow out of creativity.” An idea that I am now convinced is a possible reality due to the intellectual, thought-provoking argument made by Sir Ken Robinson that schools do restrain creativity. In Sir Ken Robinson’s TED talk “Do Schools Kill Creativity?” Robinson argues that schools do kill creativity by addressing his audience in a sophisticated yet playful tone that keeps the audience entertained and invested in what is being discussed. Robinson connects with the audience by telling jokes, using simple reasoning, facts, and personal stories that allows the audience to be emotionally moved by the argument. Robinson is able to open up the audience to a reasonable idea with only one reasonable solution, and it just so happens to be his. Obviously, a bit biased, Robinson steers clear of self-promotion by recalling stories of other’s accounts and relating to people as a professor instead of a person.

If you search almost anywhere on the internet about creativity and public schools you will run into a video by a man named Sir Ken Robinson. He emphasizes that schools kill creativity in every way. On the other hand, President Barack Obama disagrees whole heartedly. Both of these men agree that creativity is important to children and schools but they disagree on whether or not creativity is being implemented in schools. Robinson stated in his lectured at TED 2006, “I believe this passionately, that we don’t grow into creativity, we grow out of it. Or rather, we get educated out of it” (Ken Robinson. TED2006). He goes to say that

For this assignment, you’ll watch this TED talk http://www.enchantedmind.com/wp/do-schools-kill-creativity/. The speaker is a British professor, Ken Robinson, who believes schools are killing children’s creativity. This video is meant to help you build a bridge from systems of education and learning (what we have been studying) to types of thinking (what we are moving on to).

Do schools kill creativity? This is the question speaker Ken Robinson asks during his speech. He explores how schools and education impact creativity in children and how if effects them later in life. He speaks of the extraordinary capability of human creativity, education, and the future. He does an excellent job of connecting with the audience, and capturing and holding the audiences attention throughout the speech. Ken Robinson is an excellent public speaker that grabs the audience in the introduction, carries them through the body, and keeps them until the conclusion.

Robinson argues the importance of nurturing creativity in our educational system providing an entertaining case his use of pathos, ethos, and logos throughout his speech. Taking a close look at Do Schools Kill Creativity?, one could analyze

Creativity is equally as important as literacy, and we need to start treating it that way in schools around the world. According to Ken Robinson’s claim in his, “How Schools Kill Creativity” speech, he believes this to be exceptionally true. All children are creative and talented, however, we have grown up in a world where we believe that it’s wrong to exemplify our creativity. Robinson uses both, pathos, and ethos to help make his claim. He arises emotion in you; he causes you to really think, to trust him, and to question ultimately, how things are being done in the educational system. We as a world have become so consumed with the idea of putting each child into a category of what they’re going to be successful in, regardless of their creativity or passions. You’re either good at math, science, or English; everything is based on your academic ability. What happens then to the people who aren’t academically smart, but are more creative? They are then made to feel that what they have to offer the world simply isn’t good enough, but the truth is, it is good enough. Over time however, we are taught out of our creativity. Schools around the world kill creativity by instilling a sense of fear in the child that what they are doing, and how they feel is wrong, this ultimately discourages them, and they fall victim to the industrialized educational system that we have present day. Robinson believes now more than

Remember in your carefree childhood when you were encouraged to use your imagination freely? You would spend hours picturing yourself as an astronaut floating through the zero gravity environment in space. Then, teachers in school highlighted careers such as lawyers, doctors and accountants, to promote the values of our capitalist society. Today, ideas are dictated by a certain hierarchy in educational systems. Mathematical and scientific abilities are praised at the top, whereas artistic talent remains hidden at the bottom, with minimal recognition and is rarely considered more than a hobby. In a similar manner, children are commended for the quality of their intellect and are rarely applauded for the limitlessness of their imagination reflected

Like I stated earlier in my paper, I totally agree that classes such as math and English are important classes for children to have in school, but I feel just as strongly for them to be able to express themselves through their creativity such as drawing, dancing, drama or playing sports. I think it is totally wrong for such activities to be taken away from children, because it is not allowing them to truly express themselves and to become the people they are intended to be. This can surely cause a child to become hopeless, lost, and develop low self-esteem and this wouldn’t be good for the

Many people believe that education and creativity go together. The smarter you are, the more creative you are, but this is not the case at all. The education system is actually undermining creativity. Sir Kenneth Robinson is a british author and the director of the Arts in Schools Project. He has won various achievements in his career including the LEGO prize for international achievement in education. Ken Robinson did an amazing speech which turned out to be the most popular speech on Ted Talk to this day. He had this amazing speech in February of 2006. He starts his speech out by saying, “. . . children starting school this year will be retiring in 2065. Nobody has a clue, despite all the expertise that’s been on parade for the past four days, what the world will look like in five years’ time. And yet we’re meant to be educating them for it” (1). Ken Robinson believes that creativity nowadays is just as important as literacy in school, and we need to treat them with the same status through the education system. He starts talking about a story of young kids, and it sets up one of the best quotes I have ever heard. He says, “Kids are not afraid of being wrong. Being wrong is not being creative, but, if you’re not prepared to be wrong, you’ll never come up with anything original” (2).