Until now, I was very unfamiliar with slotting fees. I never knew this practice existed until I read chapter 9. “Slotting fees are fees manufacturers pay to get their goods on the shelf in a retail store or supermarket chain” (Heizer and Render, 2011, p 347). If I understand this correctly, retailers require payment from manufacturers before agreeing to give shelf or space to the manufacturers’ product. In that case, I disagree with slotting fees. I was surprised to learn that in 1978 manufactures spent 5% of sales on trade promotions and today manufactures spend up to 13%. I was also surprised to learn that slotting fees can run up to $25,000 per item. That seems outrage in my opinion because not many small manufacturers are able to afford
More shelf and trade promotion: The third strategy would be to spend more money on shelf
"Why do some stores charge membership fees and have lower prices on goods, rather than letting everyone in the store and charging higher prices?" (By Maya Wawi)
The proposed test is definitely useful in addressing the management problems because it would address the customers concerns about the new packaging and be able to provide the best customer satisfaction and to find out if the customer would recommend making their lives easier when purchasing the product. The cost would decrease per unit if the customer accepts the multipack. I think the product is very good as it stands right now. If I had to do any type of recommendations to change the carrier the only thing I would probably do is if we are going to see the product to a larger chain of stores or on the Naval Base. I would have a larger box made to hold the six (6) to either twelve (12) or twenty-four (24) case. It would definitely cut the cost down since it would be supplied in bulk.
The 10% price cut for the mass merchandiser could hurt their reputation with all of their current suppliers. Cutting the price 10% for one type of retail outlet will cause all other stores to want the same treatment. This would be a disruptive change to Fe’nix’s business and their overall profit.
The relationships with trade show retailers are highly valuable in that they often prove to be long term. Re-orders by retailers from trade shows occur at a 50% clip, and they will re-order twice per year. With an average order from a retailer being $569 (Table 1), and the direct material and labor cost fixed at $267, the contribution margin per order at trade shows will be $302 (Table 2).
In 1996 sales to this class of customer at a 30% markup represents $11,975,040 margin for Tweeter, $16,917,120 margin for Lechmere and $13,258,080 margin for Circuit City. This is an important source of margin for the Superstores, however represents only 10% and 15% of their overall sales respectively. So I believe that they will fight to keep their customers rather than fight to gain
Although often assumed to be a debate of recent origins, the local Washington, DC newspapers have published news items on the controversy many times since at least 1971, all in response to Native American individuals or organizations asking for the name to be changed. An agency of the commonwealth, the Virginia Lottery, is a sponsor of the team, and says it has never had any complaints. With the possibility of building a new stadium in the near future, both the previous and current mayors of the District of Columbia have stated that a name change must be part of the discussion, however the team rejects that possibiltiy. The fact we’re even talking about this is nauseating. Unfortunately, it ended up just being stupid. I was hoping this article
Based in the direction FLD wants to go alternatives (2) and (4) are out of the running. FLD simply does not have the capacity to aggressively market its existing shelf stable chip dips and devote the necessary attention to introducing a new product and a relatively unknown market. An increase in trade promotional expenditures might be beneficial to increase the number of distributors thus increasing the volume of units sold, but with and increased focus on consumer advertising and promotion if done correctly the need to increase trade promotion funding will be unnecessary.
As a result, larger distributors typically carry competitive products. Margins on product resale is generally higher than 10%.
1. Considering the current state of Clique Pens, a price increase would not be a good idea. Rather, there should be an approach to deploy market development funds to the consumers directly and at the same time benefit the retailers. Clique Pens president Elise Ferguson realizes that at the end of the fiscal year 2013, the company would not be able to achieve one of the company goals, which was to reduce the decrease in gross profit margin by increasing the margin by 4%. The reason for the dropping margin was due to investing in profiting the retailers through off-invoice deals, discounts, and allowances to the retailers. This means that despite the interest in benefiting them, it is apparently clear that this approach was dragging the company down. This is also the reason why Elise thought that any form of profit-driven actions towards the retailers should be in such a manner that the company has control over the sales made through the retailers, i.e., suggested retail. Through market driven funds, retailers would not be considered as the primary stakeholders of the company as this form of market approach was the main culprit behind the dropping profit margin. The market development funds should, therefore, be directed towards the consumers through the retailers. This way, Clique Pens will be directly in control of the product sales and market expansion to the consumers. At the same time, the retailers will be under control by the company contrary to them controlling the sale of Clique Pens’ products to the consumers. Furthermore, the direct control of consumers through market-driven funds were perceived as the better alternatives by Logan Chen and product managers in the department of marketing. However, similar competitors have retailer based market development funds; the consumer-oriented funds of the company should have a highly competitive offer to the retailers. The arrangement between Clique Pens and the retailers should be to increase consumer based sales and profit. Clique Pens should offer the retailers a form of commission strategy, for example; for a certain number of sales made to the consumers by the retailers, the company should award a commission to the retailers. This would increase the shelf
Pay 6% sales of each order as a fee. It makes the distributors margin became lower. So the Arrow Electronics then had to increase the price of the products to keep the balance. If they do so, might lose some market share.
This means that the price of inventories purchased by the Retail Group is increasing. A further examination revealed that the Selling, General and Administration expenses (SG&A) of the Retail Group are nearly two and half times higher than that of the Manufacturing Group.
Low product differentiation and economies of scale: There isn’t much product differentiation at play in the retail industry as there are well known manufacturers whose products are offered for sale, which leaves price to compete on. Current well established retailers with thousands of stores enjoy the economies of scale to control their cost that a new entrant might not be able to replicate after immediately entering the industry.
Target consumers and the condition now: Students in the college. Most students (up to 52%) are likely to accept an increase of $75 per year to use a Microfridge, and at $50 per year the interest level is 90%. But the authority suspects the quality and the security of the product.