What Will Happen After Ww2 Dbq

Yes there were a lot of casualties due to the dropping of the atomic bombs. But in hinesight those casualties were very minimal compared to what would have happened. Nonetheless, I also believe that President Harry Truman’s decision to use the atomic bombs against Japan almost certainly saved lives. This is undoubtedly true if one accepts the arguments of U.S. leaders at the time; namely, that not using the atomic bomb would have forced the U.S. to launch a full invasion of Japan’s home islands, and this would have killed far more people than Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

The months before the end of the war, presented America with an opportunity to employ a deadly nuclear weapon, unbeknown to the rest of humanity. And whilst it was evidently crucial for America to expose their military strength through utilising the atomic bomb, the affects were far more detrimental to the Japanese than ethically permissible.

Following its creation, the atomic bomb was used to end the war quickly because the Japanese resolutely refused to surrender (Suzuki 88). In August 1983 the well-known Japanologist and former ambassador to Japan Edwin O. Reischauer created a furor in Japan by writing in the Boston Globe that but for the bomb the Japanese would have “fought on to extinction.” This means that the bomb not only saved millions of lives but also preserved Japan “as a nation”(Sadao 100). The Japanese had already suffered greatly from air bombardments and naval blockades as well as their armed forces were deprived, but the Japanese were still far from surrender (Morton 342). It was necessary for the U.S. to drop the atomic bombs, because even

While the fighting may have done the same job in the end, they would have wasted the “thousands and thousands” of infantrymen lives (Fussell, p. 15). Americans had also heard of the fanatical views of the Japanese citizens; the Japanese soldiers, as well as the civilians, refused to surrender “until the goal was achieved” (Yamaguchi, p. 2). The Japanese Emperor was “the heart of the Japanese people and culture” and without allowing the Emperor to maintain his position, convincing the Japanese would have been impossible (Long). The emperor even said the threat of the Potsdam Proclamation was of no threat to them after being told their homeland would be destroyed (Correll). When evaluating his options, Truman realized that American deaths would continue to escalate past the 48,000 American lives lost fighting for Okinawa if he did not decide quickly (Correll). Even though the American decision has been called too harsh, it saved the almost 200,000 American lives expected to have been lost in the land invasions (Fussell p. 20). When faced with the assumption that the Japanese would not surrender under any circumstance until the goal was complete and the already mounting casualties in Japanese islands, ending the war as quickly as possible was Truman’s only

To the east and to the west everything was flattened…How small Hiroshima was with its houses gone.” What Doctor Hachiya writes is very heartbreaking. In addition, photos can also share the same effect. The photos that were taken by Yosuke Yamahata reveal the chilling aftermath of the atomic bomb. One of the photos that struck me the most was the second photo. The second photo shows a group of people lying on a mat and in the distance, there is debris from their homes. The people look very scared, hopeless and lost. Their homes were blown to smithereens and they were left with nothing. The atomic bomb was an evil that struck out of nowhere. The United States chose to send Japan a clear message to stop fighting and despite all the innocent lives that were lost, it was the right decision to do. Additionally, if I were President of the United States during the late 1940s, I would also have made the decision to drop the atomic bomb on both Hiroshima and

perfect example of the Japanese battle attitude. Japanese pilots would strap themselves into planes loaded with explosives and fly them into American ships. By the war’s conclusion the Japanese kamikaze attacks had sunk 3 aircraft carriers, damaged 285 craft and sunk a total of 34. The Japanese also did well in increasing support for the war effort. “Both scientist and publicists were in fact powerful instruments inflaming popular hatred against the democratic countries and in regimenting the people into blindly supporting the war of aggrandizement (Ferrell 16).'; This resolve would only have been strengthened had American and Russian forces tried to invade Japan. This almost suicidal type of fighting would have resulted in a tremendous amount of casualties for both sides. American casualties alone were projected at 500,000. The amount of deaths caused by an invasion would easily dwarfed those of the atomic bombings (Purcell 82).

On August 6, 1945, during World War II, and American B-29 bomber dropped the world’s first atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima. Three days later, a B-29 dropped a second atomic bomb on the city of Nagasaki. General Douglas MacArthur and other top military commanders favored continuing the conventional bombing of Japan already in effect and following up with a massive invasion, codenamed “Operation Downfall.” They advised  President Truman that such an invasion would result in U.S. casualties of up to 1 million. In order to avoid such a high casualty rate, Truman decided–over the moral reservations of Secretary of War Henry Stimson, General Dwight Eisenhower and a number of the Manhattan Project scientists–to use the atomic bomb in the hopes of bringing the war to a quick end. America was wrong to drop the atomic bombs on Japan. These actions resulted in a deterioration in Japan’s economy, the Japanese people witnessed traumatic experiences, and

The bombs took 129,000 Japanese live, but the death toll would have been much higher had an invasion taken place. The American people had been attacked unprovoked, seeking justice , and to spare their soldiers lives, they dropped the bombs. The ethical, moral, and political reasons for dropping the bombs give credit to both sides of the argument on whether the final decision was right or wrong. However, whether you support or oppose the use of the atomic bombs, their use cut the war short and saved more lives than they

Like other European countries the Japanese could not sustain their military successes against the U.S. until mid 1943 U.S. military forces had put the Japanese on the defensive. They fighting from island to island American troops recaptured the Philippines, and a combined force of British, American, and Chinese troops returned Burma to Britain. The Allies then moved toward the Japanese mainland. By summer 1945, American president Truman ordered to drop the bomb first in Hiroshima and second bomb in Nagasaki. The atomic bomb not only killed over 100,000 lives but also poisoning the soil, air, and groundwater. Later on the emperor Hirohito announced that they surrendered. Even though the used of the bomb was intended for ending the war but its effect was dreadful, many innocent victims were killed. The used of Atomic bomb was justified in this situation since the used of bomb saved more than thousands to millions lives of both American and Japanese people. Without the used of bomb the war might probably extended for longer period of time and many more lives would have been killed. It might be true that the use of atomic bomb was inhumane but every war is inhumane. (Compton)

“The committee concluded that the bomb should be used to end the war as soon as possible; that it should be dropped on a military-urban target so as to demonstrate its full force; and that a demonstration or warning should not be made beforehand, lest the bomb lose its shock value.” (McDougall np) The United States had two options really and they were either invade Japanese mainland or use the atomic bomb. “The Japanese navy had ceased to exist and Japan 's military losses were staggering, but instead of surrendering the Japanese army decided to fight on. U.S. military leaders then calculated what losses could be expected if U.S. troops invaded the Japanese mainland. Based on earlier battles, they expected the casualties to be horrendous.” (Hiroshima 77) In war, lives being lost is unavoidable, however President Truman knew that if the bomb was not dropped the amount of casualties would be too many from the invasion.

It is important to realize the background of this momentous event, in regards to the initial attack. While many people focused on Hitler and his rampage over in the European sector of the world, the Japanese went under Americans radar. It is even stated by renowned Historian Barton J. Bernstein in his journal, “The Atomic Bombings Reconsidered,” that the initial intended use for the bomb was supposedly a last ditch effort to destroy Nazi Germany (Bernstein 2). This outcome obviously never became a reality, as the tensions between Japan and the U.S. began to overshadow all other aspects of the war.

The Atomic Bomb, one of the deadliest weapons in the history, was used against Japan on August 6, 1945. Just months before they were expected to surrender in an already casualty soaked battle. A literal bomb was dropped on them, then within days another one August 9th, 1945. All this Did was add more blood on the hands of the soldiers who most barely wanted to fight in the first place, because they weren't the people who volunteered, theses were the drafted. These were the ones who did not agree with what was going on, but could not speak up because they would have been shot anyway do to them “Being against the government.” Anyways, there was no need for the bomb to be dropped or have left the U.S. for any reason really, Japan was going to surrender soon, there would have been less casualty, and everything could have been resolved a different way.

The main argument aims to defend how Japan was already defeated by the time the bombs were dropped, which of course makes sense provided that their allies, Germany and Italy, had already been conquered. However, the Japanese at the time were relentless in their struggle to avoid defeat and an unconditional surrender. Nevertheless, a survey given out by President Truman titled the “United States Strategic Bombing Survey,” was given out to 1000 experts in an attempt to study the heart of the conflict. The following conclusion of “it seems clear that, even without the atomic bombing attacks, air supremacy over Japan could have exerted sufficient pressure to bring about unconditional surrender and obviate the need for invasion” was made at the end of the survey (Dahi). Provided their implicit conclusion that the bombs were an unnecessary act of war, the argument is surfaced that Japan would not have lasted much longer if the intervention had been halted. However, as history has revealed, “the Japanese military command rejected the request for unconditional surrender” (“The Manhattan Project”). From this statement, it is evident that even if Japan had surrendered, it would have had to come at the cost of manpower and lives on both sides---something that the United States were done allocating resources to. Whether or not a single atomic bomb was dropped or many bombs meant for smaller areas, the destruction appears to parallel each

The dropping of these bombs was unnecessary. The Japanese government was on the verge of collapse. They were completely defeated, and the Japanese were ready to surrender. Admiral Leahy said, “"The use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war against Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender…”(Document 2). This weapon had no benefit towards us in winning the war against Japan. Not only that, but the US had already bombed 60 of the cities in Japan, leaving many cities ruined. Death counts from bombing raids total 300,000 lives from the US bombing. From this number, you can clearly see how the atomic bomb wasn't necessary and we had already killed so many lives. Dropping these bombs did nothing to end the war, as it already was ending. The atomic bombs only devastated Japan further and killed more civilian lives.

The atomic bombs aided in stopping the war . Very few actions in any war globally are morally justifiable. Any political leader or commander during time of war has limited options and the best they can do is to ensure that their course of action leads to minimal loss of life. The Japanese army had refused to surrender and there was very little that President Truman could do other than use the nuclear bombs. The decision may be attributed to the fact that over half a million casualties were to be caused by the invasion of the Imperial Japanese Army. Additionally, more deaths were likely to occur due to starvation for Allied PoWs as well as civilian as the war could have taken much long . The Imperial Japanese Army did not in the slightest sense consider surrender as an option meaning that the war could have raged on. They forced their men to fight from the commencement of the war. Additionally, civilians had also