What is Knowledge(Draft)

In order to manage knowledge successfully, it is essential to clarify the essence of knowledge before identifying the importance of knowledge management. The perception of knowledge has been varied broadly; however, one of the generally accepted defintion is from Davenport and Prusak (1998). According to their points of view, knowledge is defined as a set of experience and values, it either comes from individuals ' mind or roots in the organisation, which can be found in the documents, routines, practices and norms, and is assumed to flow between individuals through various networks, being used to assess and embody new

The main argument here is that the knowledge represents for me the basis of my values, from which I learned most things, which in return guided me to the other good values like the honesty, responsibility and accountability. I highly believe that the knowledge is the major source of all other good

| The study of knowledge: What constitutes knowledge, the nature of knowledge, and whether knowledge is possible

Knowledge is based on what is, or truths. The only established truths are the forms. The forms represent true, eternal, unchanging, or facts. Knowledge stems from the idea of forms. One who has knowledge must understand the forms. Only a

Knowledge is the framework for understanding information and using it to inform judgements, opinions, predictions and decisions – a pyramidal relationship (See diagram 1)

The assumption of the theory of knowledge is based on the aspects of instruction. However, for example, physical knowledge cannot be attained though logical-mathematical knowledge. There are four stages in that all children must pass through in developing knowledge. The stage follows:

To fully understand this title it is prudent to define the key terms: knowledge, traditions, areas of knowledge, correctives, and ways of knowing. Knowledge I concluded was any information that we, either as a collective population or individuals, know or believe. Traditions are the knowledge that is passed on from generation to generation. The areas of knowledge are “disciplines in which knowledge may be based”. A corrective is something meant to counteract or correct something else. Finally the ways of knowing are “the methods through which knowledge becomes apparent to us”. Having defined

Knowledge is defined to be facts, information, and skills acquired through experience or education. There are two categories that fall under knowledge; personal knowledge and shared knowledge. Shared knowledge refers to what “we know because.” It can also be defined as communicated and constructed knowledge; within culture, social norms, and semiotics. Personal knowledge refers to “I know because.” An expanded definition of personal knowledge refers to personal experiences, values, and perceptions. Shared knowledge changes and evolves over time because of methods that are continuously shared. It is assembled by a group of people. Personal knowledge, on the other hand, depends crucially on the experiences of a particular individual. It is gained

Even though we use the word, knowledge, daily, philosophers and psychologists have noted for centuries that the definition of knowledge gets more complicated. We say knowledge to what we know. However, what do we know? Is it because we have learned that we know? How do we know? How do we consider that something that we know is real and true? Many philosophers have tried to separate knowledge of “What” from “How”. In the lecture, Professor O’Brien said that Socrates and Plato said, “True knowledge cannot arise from an empirical base, so it must be innate, and innate knowledge is knowledge of perfect forms, such as geometry, mathematics, logic, and morality.” We can assume that they are saying the knowledge comes from our own perception.

“In gaining knowledge, each area of knowledge uses a network of ways of knowing.” Discuss this statement with reference to two areas of knowledge.

fact, a principle or the truth, entering our own classification of “knowledge”. On the other hand, this

In the Natural Sciences and Religion the gaining of knowledge involves networks of ways of knowing which are often linked together in order to produce knowledge. However, the gaining of knowledge can be centered on academic knowledge production for example, gaining knowledge while working on an academic research otherwise through a process of discovery where knowledge suddenly comes into people. In addition to this, a network can be defined as connections between entities to create an integrated whole. Therefore the entities, being the ways of knowing, result with the integrated whole being the knowledge. The ways of knowing are the means by which we are provided with the essential information and understanding that permits us to gain knowledge within an area of knowledge. Information can be gained while reading, reasoning, observing and talking. Also, since ways of knowing interact with each other, each area of knowledge uses a network of ways of knowing to gain knowledge. In this essay I will discuss, how in order to gain knowledge there is the involvement of a network of ways of knowing. Also, I will be analyzing this question through the perspective of two subject areas : Natural Sciences and Religion.

“Knowledge is nothing more than the systematic organization of facts,” is a quote said to shed light onto what knowledge really is. Two particular Areas of Knowing (Human Sciences, and History), have been identified as following this quote, but I disagree. The human sciences uses people as the basis for gaining knowledge, and is not only the systematic organization of facts. Likewise,

Scientists must observe the world around them. What we are doing with observations and active experiments is we are approaching the knowledge in a particular way. Based on how we interpret things with that particular approach, we conclude something. For example, you know that opposite poles attract and you may conduct a lot of experiments checking this theory and your conclusion cannot be 100% correct until you observe it by yourself. But why and how they attract is what you can call knowledge. You may have different methods to gain that knowledge and make an own conclusion after

Knowledge can be defined as information gained through sense perception, emotion, language and reason, while it is defined by Plato as “justified true belief.” The claim that knowledge takes the form of a combination of stories and facts is however not accurate in history and biology. First, it brings up the questions of what are stories and what are facts. Stories are accounts of past events from somebody’s perspective, while a fact is the truth. When looking at the two areas of knowledge, they each favour one side of the combination over the other. For example, knowledge from history mostly takes the form of stories, while knowledge from biology mostly takes the form of facts. This distinction between the different types of knowledge leads to the knowledge questions of “How do we obtain knowledge in the different areas of knowing?” and “To what extend is knowledge in certain areas of knowledge subjective or objective?”