What´s Discrepancy Model?

Response to Intervention (RtI) came about initially in answer to the over-identification of struggling students as special education students. It was developed starting in the late 1970s by numerous researchers seeking a method of identifying learning disabilities that avoids the problems of the discrepancy model. Many educators were concerned that too many students were being identified as having a learning disability, not because they actually had one, “but because they had not been successful in a general education program” (Prasse, 2010). Many were also concerned that students with a true learning disability were not receiving the help they needed quickly enough. Before RtI, the accepted

Response to intervention (RTI) is a multi-tier methodology to early identify and support students with learning and behavior needs. Research states, that educators are able to close the academic gap of a student with a disability the earlier that the child is diagnosed. Since, they are able to get the extra help as early as possible. Overtime identifying students with learning disabilities has become very confusing. However, research has made it easier for educators to distinguish these students and reduce the misunderstanding concerns. This is great news because as stated before the earlier teachers can identify these students; the earlier the child’s can get assistance. But, are these assessments properly diagnosing our Culturally, Linguistically, Exceptional, Diverse (CLED) students? The article, “Challenges of General Outcome Measurement in the RTI Progress Monitoring of Linguistically Diverse Exceptional Learners”, give the readers a walk-through on how the RTI model and General outcomes measurements (GOMs) might be putting our ELL students at risk, as oppose to helping them. The article is broken into eight sections such as: general outcome measures, how current assessment procedures impede

The two options for identifying students with disabilities are RTI model and the IQ-Achievement discrepancy model. The RTI model is a multi-tiered approach to identifying students with disabilities. With this approach the amount of students who are identified as having a learning disability has decreased because of the support students receive at different tiers and it eliminates inadequate instruction as the reason for reading problems. Universal screening and high quality teaching is done for all students. Students who show that they need additional help receive tier 1 services where frequency and intensity increases. Students are monitored and receive research based instruction in the general education classroom. Some students may still struggle and have to receive more intensive and frequent service. Those students will receive supplemental support from an educational professional. Tier 3 services are provided to students who still struggle and need even more intensive service. Students may also qualify for special education services. The IQ-Achievement discrepancy model is used to determine if a disability is present. Standardized tests are used to eliminate low intellectual ablity as a determining cause for reading problems. With this model, a professional assess whether there is a discrepancy between a student’s scores on an iq test and scores obtained from areas

As in any research based program there are benefits and challenges. One of the biggest benefits of RTI is it has the ability to transform how we educate all students. When implementing Response to Intervention it helps to treat learning disabilities, identifies students with disabilities, classifies every student’s strengths and targets the specific disability. Perhaps the greatest benefit of an RTI approach is that it eliminates a “wait to fail” situation because students get help promptly within the general education setting. As soon as assessment data indicates a problem area for a student, interventions are put into place to address these concerns. One of the biggest challenges that are occurring is that RTI is still uneven; some districts use it and some do not and because of this it becomes a challenge. There is confusion as to what RTI is and whether schools are required to use. In addition, the evidence based and differentiated instruction is one of the issues in response to education. “Interventions that are research based but not feasible are not likely to be implemented with fidelity, which would undercut the validity of RTI decision making” (Kubiszyn & Borich, 2010,

The assigned video is explaining Response to Instruction and Intervention (RTI) . This is a plan to make decisions of the educational path of a student. It enhances education for all students and assesses whether they will need additional support with growth or more independence in reading. All of the students in the building have the opportunity to be assessed through RTI not just students with an IEP.

Many children have physical, or pathological disabilities which cause them to have a below average performance in a usual classroom environment. The government of the United States of America, having recognized this, issued the Education of All Handicapped Children Act in 1975 in order to assist children afflicted with these disabilities (Berger, 2014). This lead to the creation of multiple special education programs for these children. Programs, such as LRE and RTI strategies have allowed many children to receive education they otherwise would not be able to receive.

This three-tier RTI system is wonderful at the early stages of education because it allows teachers to identify at-risk students and move them through the intervention process. However, in the later stages, it is often too late to evaluate students for learning disabilities as these should have been recognized early on in a child’s education. It should be noted that students at this stage do still need interventions, but in a different format.

Over the last decade, school administrators began implementing the RTI program at a rapid pace. This implementation was inspired by President Bush’s reauthorization of IDEA, which identified RTI as a viable way to qualify students for special education (Fuchs & Fuchs, 2007, p. 14). Fuchs and Fuchs (2007) defined RTI as a three tiered system of education. There has been research completed to show RTI was a reliable systems, but it is an open ended systems. The designers of the RTI program have left several of the specifics for individual administers to determine for their districts. While the open framework granted administrators leeway to alter the program, this also leads to questions about

Response to Intervention (RTI) is an in school service program designed to guarantee that all students are getting a high quality education. Before students are referred for special education services, it is essential that they receive effective teaching designed to meet their own learning requirements. All students in public schools are required to be included in the RTI program.

Tier 1 focuses on effective classroom instruction and practices for academics and the management of behavior for all students. Tier 1 includes the quality core instruction and curriculum all students have equal access which incorporates the classroom teacher using proactive data-driven practices to identify and help children who are not being successful (Hilton, 2007). Using research-based differentiated instruction for all learners and a universal screener to measure proficiency at least twice a year are keys to an effective program. These screeners identify students who are not meeting standards. Approximate 80%-90% of students will be successful in a Tier 1 program. If less than this percentage is successful, classroom practices must be evaluated.

RtI works at its best when personal from across the school, including administrators, general education teachers, special education teachers, supplemental specialists, music and gym teachers, and counselors all collaborate to support the framework, because each staff member shares equal responsibility for the success and failure of all students (Shapiro 2011). RtI needs the full support of all staff members, because it does not show immediate results and could take between 3-5 years to see its positive impact. RtI gives schools the chance to correct literacy issues, and fix the problem early, before students’ progress forward where they pay for it long into their future.

In the 3rd step plan the implementation is when educators will monitor and provide feedback to ensure the intervention is delivers properly. And step 4 is to evaluate the problem, consultant and teacher will evaluate the responsiveness to the intervention and modify if needed. These steps result in a great intervention program that is precise to see desired results in the RTI. With intervention trial and error is how real results are achieved. In previous years before interventions and RTI’s were placed in schools, too many children were sent for learning disabilities or special education showing teachers inability or unwillingness to teach sand accommodate academic diversity ( Reynolds, 1987). The article states how teachers can generally implement learning strategies until the student gets it and if after interventions and RTi’s measure the responsiveness as not responsive the child can be placed in special education to receive IEP’s to adjust to their learning disability.

Less than thirty years ago, a learning disability (LD) such as dyslexia was associated with "stupidity and laziness" (2005, Butterworth, p. 456). Such a notion is difficult to imagine in our world today, which we owe to scientific evidence that has allowed us to understand the genetic factors contributing to LDs. However, a number of LDs, such as dyscalculia remain relatively unexplored despite increasing awareness and acceptance of LD in general. Dyscalculia causes children to have difficulties in one or more of the following three areas, counting numbers, relating procedural problems to mathematical symbols, and solving word problems. Moreover, dyscalculia affects one in every twenty "school-aged" children (Geary, 2004, p. 5), which raises

The Pyramid of Intervention is a term applied to the system of supports that a school provides for its struggling students. It is a three tiered model of instruction and intervention. Teachers begin by using the state curriculum with all student and monitoring student progress. The teacher adapts resources to fit the needs of the students. Progress is assessed by observations, assessments, and the collection of student work. Children learn curriculum differently depending on a their readiness, participation in class, support from parents, and learning

RTI is an intervention system that is planned to increase student’s literacy. RTI is also considered a screener for students with learning difficulties (Wixson, 2012). RTI is considered to be a way to give students services before we label them with a