When Is Abortion Morally Appropriate?

There are many factors that are taken into consideration when determining if abortion is morally permissible, or wrong including; sentience of the fetus, the fetuses right to life, the difference between adult human beings and fetuses, the autonomy of the pregnant woman, and the legality of abortion. Don Marquis argues that abortion is always morally wrong, excluding cases in which the woman is threatened by pregnancy, or abortion after rape, because fetuses have a valuable future. Mary Anne Warren contends that late term abortions are morally permissible because birth is the most significant event for a fetus, and a woman’s autonomy should never be suspended.

There are many common pregnancy alternatives, but most often the resulting decision is abortion because it is effortless. Abortion is endings a women’s pregnancy by removing or forcing a fetus or embryo from the mother’s womb before it is able to survive on its own. Not all abortions are purposely done some are spontaneous like when a women that has a miscarriage. Rather abortion is done purposely or naturally it is a worldwide complication as to it being wrong or right. Abortion is an ethical issue that will be analyzed according to a personal worldview and Christian worldview. Ethical thinking will be examined by value-based decisions that address abortion from the perspective of a Christian worldview and comparing it to a personal assumption by addressing ethical dilemma, core beliefs, resolution, evaluation, and comparison.

If all the following conclusions are acceptable then the conclusion of abortion being morally wrong is accepted. Each of these premises will be defended throughout this paper.

For many years, the topic of abortion has been very controversial. Many people who are Pro-Life believe that abortion is murder; that by committing this act an innocent human being is killed. However, individuals who are Pro-Choice argue the opposite. They believe that abortion is a “fundamental right” that is guaranteed to all citizens of the United States due to our U.S. Constitution. Not only do they believe that it is a right, but they also believe that allowing women to have a choice over when they want to have a child is very empowering.

Many differences of opinion arise in regards to abortion, including the obvious “pro-life or pro-choice” question many people have defiant answers to. Abortion is a topic that most every person has a very strong, firm stance on, resulting in a worldwide debate of the matter. Differences of opinion persist within both movements. “Some pro-life activists may condone abortions in cases of rape or incest, while others take an uncompromising stance, believing that all abortion is murder” (“Abortion”). Most pro-life thinkers state that it is inhumane and immoral to abort a fetus under any circumstance, yet it is very important that the woman has the right to make her own decision based on her situation. If a woman needs to have an abortion, she

“We the people” a significant phrase that set the framework for the United States Constitution, expressing an illustration of popular sovereignty and the preservation of equality (1). While reading the first chapter of our textbook, I came to the conclusion that our republic is remarkable for its establishment in people, giving them the right to be considered dignified and respected as citizens(2). To read this article titled “Black Cornell Student Beaten in Racially Charged Attack” in the year 2017, invokes in me the importance for why students like myself need to be reminded what “We the people” truly means in the presence of bigotry(3). My decision to research this article, extends from my ethical convictions, as a student whose ambitions

The debate on whether abortion is morally permissible has led to a division of people on two sides of the spectrum. Most of the world’s population has been separated into two main moral standings on the debate on abortion; prolife and prochoice. Some are inclined to be prolife due to religious and moral understandings of the case where as prochoice is considered the more liberal and morally freeing side of the argument.

They are many opinions about abortion and whether it is moral or not. Many of the moral judgments come from religious views that stems from that all life is sacred and that life begins at conception. While, abortion is a controversial topic not all of the arguments about abortion comes down to what is the moral right for the fetus. Throughout this essay I plan to prove that along with whether it is morally right to have an abortion that there is more to consider then just the fetus.

Introduction: In this paper, I will argue that, in some cases, abortion is morally acceptable. To support my argument, which consists of two premises and a conclusion, I will provide an explanation of how my argument follows the rules of a good argument. Also, I will give some objections to my first and second premise. Lastly, I will conclude with my thoughts that contributed to the argument.

Merriam Webster defines abortion as “a medical procedure used to end a pregnancy and cause the death of the fetus.” Although that statement seems clear cut, there is a lot of controversy over whether or not abortion is a morally permissible thing to do. Those who refute abortion claim that it is the a violation of a fetus’ right to life. However, the opposite view is that forcing a woman to have a baby is a violation of the right to her own body. The question ultimately comes down to more than whose right is more important and becomes more complicated when certain situations are brought up. After much debate this issue is no longer “is abortion morally right or wrong or should it be legal” but more of “is there a middle ground where both

The arguments mentioned above each focus on the fetus or human life and rights of the baby, the pragmatic approach examines the conditions under which the woman conceives. This approach to the issue of abortion establishes a sort of ethical hierarchy to ‘the most acceptable’ conditions under which it occurs. The same hierarchical nature is applied to the most acceptable reasons under which an abortion can take place. This approach solely examines the motivations of the woman and differentiates between self-caused (intentional) pregnancy and accidental pregnancy and justifiable reasons for pregnancy. The nature of the ethics of abortion are so convoluted given that they involve a unique two person situation with potential and actual rights that come into

It is widely accepted that the fact of abortion has been a subject of conversation and controversy for many decades. Since the proportion of people who accept abortion as a ?normal? procedure is equal to the proportion of those who think of abortion as a ?crime?, through time a lot of measurements have been taken against abortion but concerning it?s defense as well. Although the fact of abortion has been examined through it?s scientific and religious side, in this assignment we will try and examine abortion from an ethical point of view. The best way for someone to refer to abortion on an ethical basis would probably be through the description and evaluation of the subject based on two of the

The moral standings on abortion have been contemplated for numerous years. Depending on one’s personal beliefs, abortion can be looked at in many different ways and used for many different purposes. For example, abortions can be used due to the mother being unstable emotionally, mentally or financially. Also, people have abortions if the child is known to have life threatening health problems or birth defects. One of the more common arguments is whether or not the mother’s rights or the fetus's rights come first. For instance, many people view abortion as morally wrong because one is killing an innocent life, whereas others believe, women have the right to choose because she is the one carrying the fetus.

The question of whether abortion is morally justified or not has taken the minds of many into an emotional state of confusion. The matter at hand is no longer an issue in which simply only the ethical principles of humankind alone are challenged. It is now an issue that has grown over centuries of practice - evolved even, into a debate of significant scale where arguments have tirelessly engaged with each other. Whilst many countries have already decided for abortion to be conditionally legal, this does not constitute abortion to be considered morally justified. The termination of a living human, if not, something which would eventually be one, is simply, by fact, legal or not - murder.

Abortion is one most divisive issues facing our country today. One of the main devastating causes that result in abortion is rape. Not only is rape a prime leading factor to having an abortion, but also numerous reasons such as negative impact on the mother’s life, financial instability, relationship problems, unwillingness to be a single mother and medical reasons such as diseases, medical disorders and stillbirth. Many people believe it is immoral and even consider it to be murder. The issue here is the pro-life supporters forget to understand the definition of abortion; “The termination of pregnancy by the removal or expulsion from the uterus of a fetus or embryo prior to being capable of normal growth.” Pro-life believers do not support the idea of induced abortion and believe it should be illegal. As a matter of fact, if abortion were to be outlawed it would still be performed, unfortunately by an untrained or even uneducated staff.