When Is Animal Cloning Wrong

The JonBenet Case Several analyses have been conducted when it comes to the JonBenet case, in which it is assumed that the parents of JonBenet murder the six-year-old beauty queen. Due to the investigation that was conducted the case is still unresolved. A different outcome could have arisen if the initial police officers and investigators would have focused on looking for other suspects other than JonBenet 's parents, secured the scene, and separated and interrogated the people inside the scene. The forensic evidence that was discovered that day was unreliable due to the standard procedures that were not followed. The first step in maintaining a crime scene integrity is to properly secure the scene and the immediate vicinity around it. If a crime scene is properly secured unnecessary disturbance and contamination of the evidence is reduced. Immediately after the scene is secured an entry log is kept to account for any person who is inside or is wanting to go inside. Shoe impressions may be asked for comparison if any latent shoeprints are found. However, this protocol was not observed in the murder of JonBenet. The scene was left unsecured, and individuals were entering as they pleased. Secondly, investigators did not follow the standard operation procedures compromising the crime

Technology is making it easier and more accessible to clone animals, especially typical pets living in normal households. The process of cloning is explained in the article “Should You Clone Your Pet” in the section “Science Fiction.” Scientists are now using genetics to make embryos, which are a cluster of cells. The embryo is then implanted in the female dog’s womb. Hopefully it would grow just as it would in a normal pregnancy. Eventually, the dog would give birth to the cloned animal. But is it really easier as it seems to clone a deceased pet instead of just getting a new one?

Cloning doesn’t always work either. Even if the chances are decreased, the chance of your cloned pet to die sooner are there, as well as the chance for birth defects. Then, would you be willing to go through the pain of another death, or even willing to pay for what it takes for the birth defects? I wouldn’t take the chance. Anyways, I wouldn’t use my money, even if I had plenty of it, to do such a thing. Instead of bringing another animal into this world, I would adopt. It’s helping another animal, and eventually you’d form bonds just as strong with that animal as you had with your deceased pet. On a different note, I wouldn’t want a pet like my old one; if I could I would take my old pet back from the grave, but despite how it may seem, cloning only makes an animal similar your old one. They would look the same, but may act completely different. There was once a bull named Chance; he was extremely docile animal. When Chance died, his owners got him cloned. The clone, dubbed Second Chance, was nothing similar in personality to Chance. Upon two different occasions Second Chance actually attacked his owners, almost killing the man.

Why did scientists keep animal cloning a secret for so long? Did the scientists know that animal cloning would cause controversies? Do the bans on animal cloning actually prevent scientists from advancing cloning technology? Did scientists think that their discovery would help or even hurt the food industry? Animal cloning could help the food industry as long as its negatives do not outweigh the positives.

The leading research team for dog cloning is at Texas A & M University. Their project is called Project Missyplicity, named after the chief contributor’s beloved

Secondly, cloning kills another animal. Cloning takes chromosomes from an egg and destroys them. That cell was going to be a new animal. Take Dolly it took 277 tries, that is 277 baby sheep killed to make another already existing sheep. If we were to clone humans any scientist who clones is technically a murderer. Other examples is the dog Snuppy they used 97 eggs to get 3 puppies. That means 97 individual puppies dead to make a clone’s clones. This is another, more grim, reason why cloning is not a good thing.

Scientist haven’t successfully cloned a human. What sense does it make, to waste money and time on something that isn’t going to be cloned. Yes, most animals are successfully cloned but why clone if you aren’t getting what you want out of it. In the article “Here Kitty-Kitty-Kitty” Magnus says “The people who want this are spending huge sums of money to get their pet immortalized or to guarantee they’re getting

She is a proven hitmaker with 35 million albums sold in the United States, giving her the record of having the most albums sold of any female country artist in the last 25 years. Her album "Come On Over" also claimed the record for the most weeks in the number one spot on the Top Country Albums chart.

Should people not be allowed to clone animals? Some people see cloning animals as bad, but some people see cloning as a good thing. Cloning should not be illegal because it has great future effects in daily life, saving endangered species, and scientist can use them as test subjects.

One thing about cloning is it won’t be like the original animal. Yes it may look identical, but the behavior won’t be. As the article, “Should you clone your pet?” stated (paragraph 9), “ In other words each clone has a unique personality… Just ask Sandra and Ralph Fisher. They had a bull named Chance, an unusually gentle animal who posed for photos with kids. When Chance died,

Cloning is a controversial topic because new areas of science often raise questions about safety. Early experiment performed on animals showed potential dangers. For example, cloned cows developed faulty immune systems. In some studies, cloned animals seemed to grow old faster and die younger than normal members of the species. According to Encarta online

Many Americans do not understand how risky it will be to clone a human, not to mention how hard it is to clone an animal. Many news article and publications offer this information to the public, because many scientists will not address the media with the real facts. In an article titled, “Creator of cloned sheep, Dolly, says he wouldn’t want to make copies of humans”, Dr. Wilmut stresses that only 1-5% of those embryos used in cloning result in live animals, and survivors are plagued with obesity, kidney problems and other troubles, and even Dolly is suffering from arthritis (1). Most cloned animals, like cows, pigs, goats, sheep, die during embryonic development, and others are stillborn with monstrous abnormalities. Bloated mothers have laborious miscarriages, and occasionally die themselves. The clones usually struggle for air in intensive care units, only to have to be euthanized, the process of ending the life of an individual suffering from a terminal illness or an incurable condition, according to an MSNBC article titled, “Much confusion over cloning” (1). The risks and uncertainties associated with the current technological state of cloning are the basis for why

In “My Sister’s Marriage” by Cynthia Marshal Rich reflects different distorted points in their motherless family.   In this story there are main three characters such as Doctor Landis as father and Olive and Sarah Ann as daughter and supportive character Mr. Dixon as future husband of Olive.   From the story, I like to highlight some points like Friendly and poor parenting, excessive control over the girls freedom, internal conflicts, rebel for freedom and distorted view of love etc.

Cloning is very unethical. It would be violating the human rights in many ways. It would be violating of the freedom of beliefs and thoughts (Peter Flaherty, and D. Lynn Moore. Civics. McGraw-Hill Ryerson, 2000) Cloning also reduces human dignity. Humans can be sold as manufactured products. If we allow

There are also many negative aspects of cloning. To create different organs or limbs in order to help a person to live longer or more comfortably seems to go against nature. The way human life should be created is through sexual intercourse. Harmond Varmus, a schoolteacher, said it best; “Human cloning represents a grave attack on the dignity of conception and on the right an unrepeatable, unpredetermined set of genes.” To clone an animal is almost the same thing. We are playing with the way humans and animals have reproduced for years. Is it fair that we clone and then kill an animal just for its organs in order to save a person’s life? Scientists are not even sure that the animal’s organs will be compatible with the human body. According to the Medical Research