When Should The Government Regulate What We Eat

The issue of whether the government's regulation of what we eat and drink is fair, this question has started many debates of whether the government should regulate what we eat and drink. On one hand people don't the government to interfere with their lives. On the other hand there are those who say the government should regulate what we and drink . Although arguments on whether the government's regulation of what we eat and drink sounds valid, there are some problems with them. Yes!! Government regulation of what we eat drink is fair>

The Federal government for years has told people what they should and should not put in their bodies. Whether it’s Tran’s fat or cigarettes, sugar or alcohol, saturated or salt, legislators and regulators pick things off our table because they think they know better. For example, considering the widespread of obesity in America, it is substantiated by statistics that “the cost of obesity is currently estimated at $190 billion per year” and the bad thing about it’s coming from taxpayers. (Experts, The) I have several issues with this statement: first, the simple fact that the government is spending money on a disease that humans caused on themselves. According to the article” What Causes Obesity?” it is stated that “The risk factors that contribute to obesity can be a complex combination of genetics, socioeconomic factors, metabolic factors and lifestyle choices”. Sadly, citizens have not much choice but to pay higher taxes. And finally, the simple fact that the government is spending money on ineffective solutions. According to the article, ‘Government Intervention Will Not Solve Our Obesity Problem’, it is stated that “despite the myriad of studies showing American obesity is increasing, research does not clearly support that government can solve this complex problem’ (Marlow) For example, the government solution of adding calories counts on the menu. A recent study has shown that “27.7 percent who saw the calorie labeling” had

Everyone loves the idea of a government that truly cares about him or her. Especially a government that would go so far as to layout a healthy diet plan to insure the health of your children and to battle childhood obesity. It is great that the government is concerned about adolescent obesity and the nutrition students receive at school. However, the National School Lunch Program (NSLP) Food and Nutrition Guidelines provide more problems for schools and they need to be eradicated, as well as repealing the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act.

Obesity has dangerously increased over the years. Its consequences can be fatal for the human immune system. Some of the complications of overweight are: heart disease, diabetes, malnutrition, cancer, and even death. However, the cost of healthy food is twice or three times more than the price of junk food. Everywhere healthy options are more expensive, even water costs more than sodas. Making healthier food more affordable, will contribute to having healthier population. I think healthy food options should be more affordable because cheaper prices for junk food promotes obesity and other severe health issues, and families with low income can’t afford the costs of a healthy lifestyle.

Obesity and malnutrition threatens our American society. So much so that the government has taken it into their hands to control what we eat and how we eat.

The Federal Government has worsened the obesity epidemic by subsidizing fast food industry and allowing markets to produce cheap, unhealthy products. Especially low-income families are subject to this obesity epidemic because they are only able

The obesity epidemic is rapidly advancing in the U.S., leading to physical and mental health problems as well as having financial impacts. Although there are existing federal programs and policies that address the obesity problem, these policies do not seem to account for the urgency of the current situation. It is essential to examine new policy strategies to combat the growing threat of obesity. Policy strategies explored in this paper include implementation of federal subsidization of healthy meals and taxation on fast food.

Are Americans becoming too overweight? Should the government have some sort of say in our diet? There are a multifarious number of obese and overweight people in the United States. We are becoming an unhealthy society and ending up with several diseases linking to obesity. More than two in three adults are premeditated to be overweight or obese. More than one in twenty adults are expressed to have extreme obesity (overweight np). This clearly shows us, being Americans, have no self-control whatsoever on the food we eat and how we take manage our bodies. We need any help we can get. So, I believe the government should have a say in our diet, considering we cannot control ourselves.

Despite having teams of the top scientist in the nation there is no nutrition expert or scientist on this planet-let alone our nation- who will say that the government controlling our diets will do anything to change the prevalence of obesity in American citizens. In 2008 the government implemented a tax on sugary drinks in New York however, this had an extremely limited effect on obesity rates. Abdukadirov states

One may not agree with the government regulating our own food. The government wants healthier food choices, people to be more athletic, and they really want everyone to make better decisions. The government is only trying to get the population to be healthier. People may not agree with the government regulating our own food choices.

Due to the obesity epidemic, the government may need to intervene as a result of its own involvement in supporting institutions that are contributing to the problem. For example, the government supports the production of food commodities and subsidized U.S. crops, most notably sugar

One may agree with the government regulating our food. If the government regulate our food, food will be healthier. Fast food will sell less unhealthy food. Restaurants will also sell less unhealthy food. Looking at calories on menus will let people decide what they want to get. By looking for how much calories that something contains. This will most likely make people want to go out and eat because of the healthy foods at fast food and restaurants. This will also bring in more people which means more money.

Healthy-eating activists are trying to persuade the government to make changes to foods that are unhealthy. They are wanting tax cost to be raised on sugary sodas, portion sizes to be restricted, and nutrition labels to be expanded. Food activists want better

The U.S. is one of the fattest countries in the world. More than ⅓ of American adults are obese. You probably have an obese friend, not only is it unaesthetic, but it’s also extremely unhealthy. Obesity can shorten a person’s life by 14 years. Unless you’d like to spend the last 14 years of your life without your beloved fat friend, then something needs to be done. It isn’t just a few people spending 14 years of their lives feeling guilty for helping end their fat friends life sooner, if over ⅓ of people are obese then the majority of people have to carry the weight of ending a friends life too soon. If action isn't taken the problem will just continue to get worse. I propose we ban the sale and production of all junk food and have government

Over the past 50 years, the way we eat has changed more than it had in the previous 10,000. Now, 60% of Americans over the age of 20 are overweight. The fast-food industry is highly responsible for today’s health epidemic. Some people choose to blame the government for not balancing individual rights, and the common good. However, the government is not forcing you to eat. You put yourself at risk of diet related health problems.