When The Editor Should Decide Whether To Edit Video Content

Television is the mainstream of our culture. Violence on television has been a topic of conflict since before 1950. There have been repeated debates on how to protect children from the harmful effects of violence on television. Television is one form of modern media that influences the everyday lives of people. Televised violence has a major effect on how children perceive the world and how they behave. "American television has become the most violent in the world. It is for this reason why researchers have focused their attention toward television violence" (Cantor & Hoffner 424-4-25). Children enjoy watching television and now with the increased technology of cable and movie

Viewers across the nation are affected by the social media causing stress on the subject by bombarding the public with media stories, rumors and “a sense of mass panic”. Victims have to relive that horrible moment because the media wants to

assassination challenged TV executives to basically invent live TV news and figure out the technology needed to produce remote-live coverage to meet the television audience’s new expectations. When news of J.F.K. assassination was received by the TV stations, they were not prepared to cover live-breaking news. “Up until that weekend in Dallas, what people saw was the finished news product – the edited story and the cropped photo in their newspapers, or the packaged stories that appeared on television,’ said long time CBS journalist Bob Schiefer.” (Barney, C., 2016, August 12) After watching the shooting of accused assassin Lee Harvey Oswald on live television, there was a huge cultural shift in how people wanted to experience the news. The television audiences’ expectations shifted from being a passive receiver of news to an active observer of the events, where they did not have to rely on someone else’s interpretation of the

Just by looking at a recent event that has been in the news this can be seen. Looking at the recent event from Fox News and the Washington Post of the Orlando shooting the form in which the information is portrayed has an interesting impact on the person viewing it. The video on Fox News was made in a way to keep your attention having details such as including a woman with blond hair to help portray the news, strong emotions partly portrayed through the serious attitudes of the conveyors, and a short length. All of these aspects were put in for a reason, to keep our interest. If it doesn’t then we will simply stop watching it because of our short attention spans. Like Postman would say it was for entertainment. There was nothing about the given situation that could be connected to our lives. The article on the Washington Post however was different. Even though there was still not really anything that could be taken to connect with one's personal life it was not portrayed in quit as enrapturing a form. There were many facts and quotes given by different professionals making it a lot less interesting to take in and harder to keep reading. Even though both news organizations still centered on the aspect of entertainment the different forms in which the information was given gave a different turn on the similar information

Those are a few of the criteria that the media looks for when broadcasting a story as it creates a shock value that draws in viewers and can create a better visual. For the Las Vegas attack, the media showed diagrams of where the “sniper” was when he began shooting (BBC, 2017), and videos quickly went viral of the concert right when the shooting began. Greer (2007) argues that with the rapid development of technology it has changed how media produces their stories, and picks crimes more on a visual bases to create a media spectacle. This could explain why those mass shootings were so widely covered.

In the media there is a great deal of violence and nobody can really deny that. However, the effects media has on children and young adults have been debated for years. In this paper I will be discussing the effects of media violence, the other factors, and the possible solutions to alleviate this global issue.

Everyone is influenced and shaped by society. Society affects our perceptions, our consciousness, and our actions. A majority of the influence, especially on the younger demographic comes through the media; specifically through television. It is important to examine how violence in the media develops a pervasive cultural environment that cultivates a heightened state of insecurity, exaggerated perceptions of risk and danger, and a fear-driven propensity for hard-line political solutions to social problems. The purpose of this essay is to evaluate the impact of television and media violence, as well as the human cost of violent media, and the overall effects on society from watching TV.

In the mean world syndrome video, several points are discussed about how violence in the media affects viewers. Although violent crimes has decreased over the years, the media has been showing more violent acts than before. Children have been affected by this phenomenon and it has had a disturbing effect on them too. The media should be more proactive with being fair and less damaging in the future.

There is a proceeding with dialog in the matter of whether brutality in the media is really in charge of the fierce conduct in kids and in the public eye, or whether it is a substitute to portray the rough society in which we live. It is evident that our general public today is amazingly brutal. TV is an indication of genuine living. Keeping in mind the end goal to deal with the issue of brutality in our way of life, we should quit faulting the indications and overlooking the heart of the issue. Savagery is all over and is difficult to dodge, however by staying away from the issue it won't vanish.

In the past few years, I have noticed that the news talks about some pretty touchy subjects, and it causes an up-roar in society. For example: the shootings that have been taking place all around America is an affect of television. Because television allows news about shootings become mainstream, it causes people to choose a side about if cops are rightfully doing their job or abusing their power. If television only allowed

Media violence is one of the most debated public issues society faces today. Television screens are loaded with the glamorization of weapon carrying. Violence constitute as amusing and trivialized. Needless portrayals of interpersonal violence spread across the television screens like wild fire. Televisions spew the disturbing events such as children being assaulted, husbands inflicting domestic abuse on their wives and children succumbing to abuse by their parents. Scenes of betrayal, anguish, infiltrate the television screen. Unfortunately, a child becomes subjected to media violence. Everything a child sees or hears in the media affects them in some way or another. The precise effects of media violence on children are

It explains the impact of violence in our society and how that could bring to a person or their memory the image of physical or emotional assault. In most circumstances, the person affected with the violence is more aware that violence is an action that can have impact on people. There is also another form of violence where individual that is being affected in most cases are unaware of the violence inflicted upon them. For example, we have television seen as a source of the most broadly shared images and messages in history; it is the mainstream of the common symbolic environment into which children are born and which has a major part to play in our lives. One can argue that media violence contribute towards social violence where the effects place a huge impact in ones being. Television violence is not only a form of media violence; there are other significant forms of media that contribute to media violence which are computer games, comic books, and

Today’s society is heavily influenced by television. The violence disrupts a child’s learning process and can alter the moral beliefs that an older person has. Children view more violence on Saturday mornings than any other time. The cartoons aimed at little children influence youngsters to mimic violent acts because their parents do not fully explain the effects of the stunts. It is pathetic that in such a technology based society, such a simple thing as television can have a negative effect on people.

In today’s world, there is an endless amount of information available to people everywhere around the globe. Mass media is definitely shaping our world, whether it is in a positive way or a negative way. Television and the radio waves provide us with hours of entertainment. The emergence of the Internet allows us to access thousands of pages of information within the reach our very own fingertips. But with the convenience of all this information comes along a certain level of responsibility. As a society, we Americans must decide what is appropriate information and entertainment for the masses to access and enjoy. But does today’s society give too much leeway in what it thinks as “appropriate?” Does increased

The vividness of presentation is one way to raise the level of salience of an issue. A story that is presented with graphic detail can cause the public perception of the issue involved to greatly increase. If a story is sensationalized by the media, the audience will unconsciously attach themselves to that particular topic. A story that shows graphic details and pictures of the events of that story cause people to feel as if they were a part of that event. For example, pictures of the crash of Flight 800 stick in the audience’s mind. This leads the audience to believe that the crash of Flight 800 is an essential story that we must learn more about. The problem with this is that the audience sometimes focuses too heavily on the story to see the issue at hand. This can negatively affect the media’s agenda setting power because the story is too detailed for the audience to see the issue behind the story (Baran 302).