Have you ever wondered about the journey of savory fruit take to sit in an American kitchen? Do you wonder how difficult it is to harvest coffee beans for daily cup of Starbucks coffee? Ranging from the Starbucks coffee beans in the land of Colombia to the intensified scuba diving ventures for live lobsters in Nicaragua, who really obtains our food? Where Am I Eating, by Kelsey Timmerman, relays exclusive field observations to readers, supplies critical interviews, and attempts to a mimic day in the life of these workers to answer these questions. Pesticides and genetically modified has unknowingly become part of a worldwide consumption trend. Beyond pesticide planes flying over banana worker’s heads to EMO seeds only being available for farmers, the author reveals how much the workers of these products are affected. With convenience and luxury for consumers comes the oppressed truth about the lives of the impoverished workers. Company websites contain descriptions of …show more content…
A author asked what Americans should know about the Colombian farmers, a response was, “Kelsey, please tell people that I come from a country where we work hard to give them the best quality of coffee we can give. We are honest. Tell them I have my health and my son and my family. (55) Workers in the Ivory Coast plead, “If we expect him [a son] to have a chance and not struggle as hard as his father an his grandfather and his great grandfather, we need to start valuing this generation of cocoa farmers as we value the fruits of their labor.” (117) This tactic worked because a majority of readers because readers can relate to. Finding out the truth about workers, their similar goals for their families as Americans, and their constant yearning for a better life is a huge factor that Timmerman successfully conveys. It is a main focal point within this part quarter of the book’s
In Slaughterhouse Blues, anthropologist Donald Stull and social geographer Michael Broadway explore the advent, history, and implications of modern food production. The industrialized system behind what we eat is one of the most controversial points of political interest in our society today. Progressions in productive, logistical, retail, and even biological technologies have made mass produced foods more available and more affordable than ever before. This being said, the vague mass production of ever-available cheap “food” carries with it several hidden
The first introduction in the film is multiple images of farms, and agriculture of all kinds. Then the author quickly states that farms do not look like they use to. The message, and start of this film is to inform the viewer about the changes in agriculture, and present ideas about where our food actually comes from. The purpose of the film is to introduce to consumers the risk of eating foods that are owned by large corporations. This film addresses issues with large corporations owning all food sources, treatment of animals, and food-borne illnesses.
One of the most popular food in the world. Chocolate! This delicious food is made from cocoa beans which are grown in pods on tree trunks.The production of cocoa beans have expanded over the years, from South America to the Europeans to the U.S. They originally were grown only in South America until Columbus brought them back from his last voyage. Since then cocoa has only grown in popularity. (Background Essay) The production of chocolate is poor for the Ivory Coast. First, the Ivory Coast isn’t earning enough money from the total income from exporting the cocoa beans for chocolate bars. Second, the agriculture on the Ivory Coast is terrible. Lastly, the cocoa production is affecting the existence of animals on the Ivory Coast.
We eat bananas almost every day; however, most of us do not really know where these fruits come from. In Banana Cultures, John Soluri focuses on the relationship between banana production in Honduras, especially in the North Coast between roughly 1870 and 1975, and banana consumption in the U. S.. He focuses on growing, protecting, transporting, and mass marketing of bananas. John Soluri integrates Agroecology, anthropology, political economy, and history in order to trace the symbolic growth of the banana industry. The author admits that his work is highly interdisciplinary, as a desirable trait in the academic world. The study incorporates a wide range of sources, including manuscript census data from Honduras, fruit company records, published scientific records, Honduran and U.S government correspondence, oral testimonies, and ephemera from U.S mass culture. Throughout his work, he combines elements of geography, biology, social history, foreign affairs, and environmental history. Soluri also looks at labor practices and worker’s lives, changing gender roles on the banana plantations, and the effects of pesticides in the Honduran environment and people. His central argument is that United States consumption of bananas causes major social, political, and environmental change in Honduras. In addition, he looks at the banana pathogens, the ways the United States treated these fungal diseases, and the terribly detrimental effects these new treatments had on the farmers on
Chiquita, the oldest banana transnational in Latin America was the primary target of banana worker rights and environmental activists until 2001. The company has since teamed up with the Rainforest Alliance to roll out the Alliance’s standards to its banana farms in Latin America.6 Chiquita prides itself on its recent changes, which have involved revamping the company to promote “The Chiquita Difference”; this includes a philosophy of social responsibility, sustainability, community involvement and food safety.7 These changes arose from the use of political activism by consumers in response to poor workers rights, thus exemplifying the fact that people do realize where their food is coming from and are willing to fight for those who create it. This shows that the process of defetishization has begun for many. Production
In the essay, “The Pleasures of Eating”, Wendell Berry, a lifelong farmer and an expert on food production, claims that eating is an agricultural act. According to Berry, consumers have become passive and don’t really know what they’re putting into their bodies. All they know is that they’ve been persuaded to want it. The extent of their knowledge is that plants and animals are raised on farms. They don’t know where the farms are, what type of farms they are, or what knowledge of skills are involved in farming. He supports this claim by first bringing to light the ignorance of the passive consumer and how they as passive consumers have become victims of the food industry. Then, he discusses how one must willingly escape this by reclaiming responsibility
More and more health-conscious individuals are scrutinizing the source of the food their family consumes. However, even the most conscientious consumer is not fully aware of the exhaustive efforts and struggle to get a juicy, ripe strawberry or that plump tomato in the middle of winter, even in Florida. These foods are harvested and picked mostly by seasonal and migrant farm workers. Migrant workers hail, in large part, from Mexico and the Caribbean, and their families often travel with them. Migrant farm workers must endure challenging conditions so that Americans can have the beautiful selection of berries, tomatoes, and other fresh foods often found at places like a farmer’s market or a traditional super market. Seasonal and
One does not necessarily expect books about food also to be about bigger ideas like oppression, spirituality, and freedom, yet Pollan defies expectations. Pollan begins with an exploration of the food-production system from which the vast majority of American meals are derived. This industrial food chain is mainly based on corn, whether it is eaten directly, fed to livestock, or processed into chemicals such as glucose and ethanol. Pollan discusses how the humble corn plant came to dominate the American diet through a combination of biological, cultural, and political factors. The role of petroleum in the cultivation and transportation the American food supply is also discussed. A fast-food meal is used to illustrate the end result of the
Throughout my reading of Where Am I Eating? I learned about the multiple issues surrounding the global food economy. Parts I-III opened my eyes to a whole other world that I was completely oblivious of. I’m not sure what I thought went on behind the scenes of where my food was being grown previous to my reading of this book, because I’m not sure it ever crossed my mind at all. So, you could say I wasn’t too shocked to learn about the horrible conditions that occurred in the coffee, chocolate, and banana plantations that Kelsey visited, but I was absolutely blown away by the lifestyle that the lobster divers faced in Part IV
Not only with the lack of education that could help the residents see the chemical effects of grooming GM crops and prevent it from harming their bodies, but also in conjunction with the mental pressure to secure money, it leads to “sickness” of the mind and the thoughts of ending their own lives. These two concepts explains the limited social mobility of the people in Monsanto, where many residents face extremely difficult obstacle to move to a higher social class. Despite the drive of obtaining money from globalization, which should help residents move up the social ladder, the high mortality rate instead reverse the effect of globalization, changing the opportunity of making money to being in debt from borrowing money and losing property. This leads the residents, despite moving to a higher social position, digress and possibility shift lower on the social ladder. To further limit social mobility, several aspects of perceived neoliberalism, which should give the farmers the options to choose how to farm, affected the experiences of how farmers in Monsanto attempted to buy GM seed to make
The documentary Food Chains portrays the story of poor workers who make a living everyday by picking tomatoes and putting them into a basket. These workers come from a small town in Florida called Immokalee. The purpose of the film is to make the general public cognizant about the terrible conditions these workers experience without sufficient wages. The filmmakers tried to get the reality of these workers across to the public, especially large companies like Walmart and Publix, so that the pleas and demands for higher wages from these workers can be heard. The public does not pay attention to who cultivated the tomatoes they are consuming or who picked the oranges that they are now making orange juice out of.
“Should We Care About Genetically Modified Foods?” by John N. Shaw appeared in Food Safety News issue of February 1, 2010, as a feature under the health section on the controversy between the pros and cons of genetically modified foods (Also known as GMO, genetically modified organisms). The main idea of this article is to inform people of the benefits of GMOs . The author, John Shaw received his Bachelor of Science degree in Finance with a minor in Marketing from the University of Arkansas in 2007, where he was a “leadership scholar.” In addition to his studies, he has worked as a research assistant with Food Law LL.M. Director Susan Schneider, interned with Wal-Mart Government and Corporate Affairs division, the Arkansas Attorney General Public Protection Division, and with United States Senator Blanche Lincoln. John has a passion for Food Law, sports, and outdoors. In the article, he states, “ I submit that I am no scientist; merely an interested student.” According to the article, he is passionate and has done sufficient research about the topic to support his argument.
"We used to produce rice and we had excellent coffee; now we produce nothing. With the situation here people abandoned the fields," says Lopez "empty shelves and no one to explain why a rich country has no food. It's unacceptable," adds the 90-year-old farmer from San Cristóbal, on the western state of Táchira, bordering Colombia.
The article explores how the Sulawesian people went from producing the food they needed to survive to planting cacao as a cash crop which they sold to survive (Li, 2014). After reading her article and listening to her lecture, I found that I had a greater appreciation and understanding for the production and availability of the food that I consume.
The fact that Monsanto was so easy to penetrate Vietnamese agricultural market not only question a huge number of social activists but also surprise many Vietnamese citizens including me. Monsanto was one of the main suppliers of Agent Orange - a military herbicide used in America - Vietnam war from 1965-1969, which has been causing millions of hectare deforesting as well as thousands of deaths and millions of malformation cases in Vietnam (Monsanto, 2009). Now Monsanto changed their business to agriculture sector, who “focus on agriculture working to find sustainable agriculture solutions” (Monsanto, 2009) and are selling genetically modified (GM) seeds to Vietnamese farmers. The problem is that a reliable conclusion on GM seeds’ benefits and hazards are still of highly controversial topic.