Which Do You Think Would Help The Citizens Of The World'S Poorest Nations More, Increasing Foreign Aid Or Removing All The Agricultural Tariffs And Subsidies?

1069 Words4 Pages
Two Questions Which do you think would help the citizens of the world's poorest nations more, increasing foreign aid or removing all the agricultural tariffs and subsidies? The latter would help them more. Here's why, in researching global poverty one can come across startling statistics, e.g. almost half the people in the world live on less than $2.50 a day (Shah, 2011), 1 out of every 2 children live in poverty (Shah, 2010); speaking of children, 1 child will die every 4 seconds due to poverty, easily preventable diseases and illnesses, and other related causes (Shah, 2010), the GDP of the 41 Heavily Indebted Poor Countries is less than the wealth of the world's 7 richest combined (Shah, 2011). These facts are dumbfounding. And they might cause one to reason that global poverty is an issue of insufficient supply. That if there were more food and resources available and disseminated around the world, these impoverished people would (1) stand a better chance at surviving the hardships of poverty, and (2) have an increased opportunity to make a better life for themselves. While this is not an illogical way of reasoning, as there is an occasional shortage of food and resources (particularly medicines), one of the main causes of global poverty is an oversupply of goods, resources, and services. And this may seem counter-intuitive given the aforementioned facts (how can people remain poor when there's plenty to go around?). Nevertheless, this oversupply phenomenon is

More about Which Do You Think Would Help The Citizens Of The World'S Poorest Nations More, Increasing Foreign Aid Or Removing All The Agricultural Tariffs And Subsidies?

Open Document