The aspect of American identity worth focusing on is the concept of America as a nation of immigrants, that surely is a relatively truth. However, it is often presumed to be the full truth. Harvard political scientist Samuel Huntington’s book Who Are We? argues about many perspectives on immigration and the American’s identity. Huntington thinks the importance we provide our national identity has varied that we have defined our identity regarding ethnicity, ideology, race, and culture, vary over time. Referring America as a nation of immigrants is a false statement to Huntington, and immigrants are the only new arrivals to the settlers. Huntington also talks about how America’s core culture is based on the settlers society and the main factors of that culture such as: Christianity, English language, religious engagement, and English concepts of the rule of law. Samuel Huntington defines those who came to the New world in 17th or18th centuries are societies of settlers, Huntington believes that Immigrants did not really play a big roll for changing the settlers’ s society in the early years and the foreign born average is only …show more content…
He believes that a multicultural America will ultimately become "a multicreedal America," with different groups of different cultures. However, he does not mention a clear problem is that such an America would quickly become ungovernable. No political system can possibly work if large segments of the population refuse to endorse it or observe its rules. As Huntington himself views it, the most serious challenge to America’s traditional Anglo-Protestant identity and cultural values comes from the heavy and continuing immigration from Latin America, especially specifically from Mexico. In addition, he says that Mexicans are behind other immigrant groups in such important aspects of assimilation as educational attainment, employment, learning English, and
Since the dawn of American colonization in the early 1600s, the notion of immigrating to America has long been instilled upon various people as a stimulating opportunity to begin a fresh chapter in their lives. Even now, this possibility has brought many variations of people to America, culminating a society that brims with dreams and aspirations to form the diversified nation of today. When speaking of the current state of immigration, it is easy to conclude that immigration is heavily discussed from political standpoints. Though this current condition is composed of highly controversial perspectives, many of the early-century viewpoints found in literature genuinely embrace reality, for these writers were indeed immigrants themselves, thus adding an authoritative standpoint over immigration. The Americanization of Edward Bok (1921) by Edward Bok and The America I Believe In by Colin Powell, display the perspectives of two authors, who have lived as immigrants, through their own personal anecdotes. Both Edward Bok and Colin Powell convey a sincerely grateful tone and develop the idea of Americanization and the quest for opportunity through the use of connotative diction in contrast to the Immigration Chart and Political Cartoon which have a downright concrete and pessimistic tone and supports the idea that immigration exposes various challenges to incoming immigrants.
In “The Right Road to America?,” Amy Chua informs her audience about the possibility of America’s national identity becoming lost due to the influence of immigrants. Chua’s defines her thesis by stating “Around the world, nations face violence and instability as a result of their increasing pluralism and diversity,” (336). The key points of the text includes Chua explaining why America and other nations could lose their core identities, how the United States could become unglued from its true meaning, and how citizens can fix this imminent problem. The information in this text is significant, especially in today’s society. With all of the issues about immigration coinciding with our current president, this text relates to current subjects
Turner and Roosevelt’s writings focus on the importance of a national identity, rather than the individual’s ethnic or cultural identity. America is a melting pot, comprised of immigrants from Europe and Asia. These people are urged to let go of their individual identities and become “Americanized”. Both Turner and Roosevelt write that there is no room for anything other than an American national identity. In their writings, Turner and Roosevelt show very little tolerance for the week of mind and spirit. Roosevelt states in American Ideals that “the mighty tide of immigration to our shores has brought in its train much of good and much of evil; and whether the good or the evil shall predominate depends mainly on whether these newcomers
Huntington explains that a lot of the founding principles of the United States, such as freedom from oppression, and the formulation of the government were based on the majority cultures, which were white Europeans. Following the creation of the country, millions of people have flocked from the four corners of the globe in order to live in a nation of freedom and understanding (Huntington 1). It is thus the white originator culture which has allowed the United States to become a melting pot. However, Huntington proclaims that this unique identity is being threatened by the large amounts of Hispanic people who are becoming a part of the United States. Without assimilation into the larger culture, the ever-increasing number of Hispanics will likely become so numerous as to divide
For many decades the history of the United States and immigration has always been a very talked about topic of debate. Many Americans did not like the collision that immigrants would have upon the native-born American people, while others welcomed the flow of people as adding to America’s multiculturalism of difference. According to Immigration: Good or Bad for America (2016), a large amount of immigrants try to enter the U.S. borders without proper documentation, in this manner being labeled as illegal immigrants. In addition, the United States unusual position as a nation of immigrants is being questioned by
Immigrants are a large number in the population of America, therefore their influence on the country’s overall view on societies have changed. Paine can suggests that the rapid flow of immigrants can serve as a threat to the “unison” that America so deeply wants to achieve because the people within the country are all different. Thomas Paine believes this idea of uniting people as “impractical” due to the large amount of differences of the people, yet society has adjusted to the changes and now people live as a community. The problems within society has not changed, but citizens of America have chose to accept the people who live around them without mistreatment of others simply for their culture and
The collection “Coming to America” is comprised of journal entries, biographies, and autobiographies that discuss the social and political transformations that arose from immigration. “Of Plymouth Plantation”, “Balboa”, and “‘Blaxicans’ and Other Reinvented Americans” illustrate how immigrants shape America’s direction. The changes that occurred when settlers migrated seriously impacted the nation they were travelling to. The first of these changes pertains to culture. Immigrants brought their religions and languages to their host country, and that caused a great deal of acculturation, usually to the new religion or language. Government is another principle that was implemented into the “inner workings” of the new country. Lastly, the newcomers
The year is 1776. In an act of defiance of the oppressive rule of the powerful nation of Great Britain, the political leaders of the British-American colonies sign into existence the United States of America. Even before this inception of the United States, North America had been seen as a place where one could move to start a new life and reap the full rewards for one’s work. These opportunities combined with the new United States government founded on the ideals of freedom and equity have attracted countless families from all over the world, making the United States truly a country of immigrants. Immigrants from European nations coming to America both assimilated and helped
Instead, it was in flux considering the changes they underwent in American assimilation efforts. Further, their cultural identities were a depiction of where the Mexican immigrants were at that historical moments that is, their positions. Regardless of whether they chose the identity or it was given to them by those in power. The identity they adopted differed from the one they held on to in the past. Moreover, Hall posits that cultural identity was not essential, or rather innate. The identity Mexican immigrants adopted was created from conditions in America. With harassment and discrimination, Mexican immigrants were different, inferior, and experienced themselves as the Other (Woodward, 1997). The notion of identity is fluctuating. For Mexican immigrants, they necessarily did not choose their new identity. However, they had the potential to change it, considering Hall regarded it as a matter of becoming as well as being. Cultural identity, was something that could, and probably would, differ in the
In the United States, the cliché of a nation of immigrants is often invoked. Indeed, very few Americans can trace their ancestry to what is now the United States, and the origins of its immigrants have changed many times in American history. Despite the identity of an immigrant nation, changes in the origins of immigrants have often been met with resistance. What began with white, western European settlers fleeing religious persecution morphed into a multicultural nation as immigrants from countries across the globe came to the U.S. in increasing numbers. Like the colonial immigrants before them, these new immigrants sailed to the Americas to gain freedom, flee poverty and
Two hundred forty-one years. In that small amount of time America forged its self into a vast landscape of different cultures. A combination of numerous cultures mongrelized together to form “We the people” in America today. Due to all the mixing in the pot, an uncertainty about the countries identity arose. For all the beauty that the melting pot brought, it also created a darker side, as aspects of each cultures fought for superiority in the nation. This fight emerges throughout American history and as a new era of deporis rises, the issues are becoming more relevant. In American Dreamer by Bharati Mukherjee, she shares her own experiences as an immigrant and the fight she partook in to have her own American identity seen. Mukherjee’s fight mirrors hundreds of naturalized American citizens who are trying to realize their identity, however it also shines light on native-born Americas struggling as well. The need for a unified American identity produces a nationwide identity crisis.
In “Uncle Sam Doesn’t Always Want You”, Mark Arex asserts “nativism is the most stubborn traits of American”. He introduces an anti-immigration debate, which is called Proposition 187, argues about whether immigration can get a valid status in the United States. Mark uses his experience to point out a phenomenon that the former immigrants against the new immigrants again and again. However, they seem to forget they are also immigrants to the United States. Also, the author points out that demand of workers leads to necessarily immigration. Nevertheless, worry makes the former immigrants to limit the new immigrants. Besides, he generalizes Schrag’s idea, the author of “Not Fit for Our Society”, the American remembers orthogenesis
The United States has been a host to a wide diaspora of people. Immigrants have had to transition from their familiar land to a new-fashioned foreign land that they must consider home. They bring with them the essence of their initial homeland such as customs, traditions and beliefs that inadvertently change the dynamics of culture within the United States. As a result the United States is an extremely culturally diverse nation. The continual changes or accretions that Americans encounter have always been a controversial topic depending on the experiences of individuals and communities that have immigrant populations. This essay will critically explore
“We are nation of immigrants. Some came here willingly, some unwillingly. Nonetheless, we are immigrants, or the descendants of immigrants, one, and all. Even the natives came from somewhere else, originally. All of the people who come to this country come for freedom, or for some product of that extraordinary, illusory condition. That is what we offer here—freedom and opportunity in a land of relative plenty.” (Middletown Journal 2005)
America is largely made up of immigrants, and thus it is referred to by many as an immigrant’s nation. The rise in immigrants of the first generation and those of second or third generation is changing the demographics of the United States each day. Duncan and Stephen observe that about “a quarter of U.S. residents are either first-generation immigrants or the second-generation children of immigrants” (109). Most of these immigrants move to the country with the aim of achieving the American dream through career success. We would like to believe that the nation follows through with its American ideology that immigrants are welcomed with open arms, and they will have economic opportunities. However, the process of integration and assimilation of these immigrants has for long been a common debate question. The immigration waves into the United States have occurred in several waves over the past years. In the earlier years, most of the immigrants were from Europe and their assimilation was rather smooth. But, the recent wave of immigrants groups prevalently from Asia and Latin America do not face similar acceptance and open arms as their predecessors.