Who Cares About Haiti?

In Peter Singer’s 1972 post titled “Famine, Affluence and Morality”, he conveys that wealthy nations, for example the United States, has an ethical duty to contribute much a lot more than we do with regards to worldwide assistance for famine relief and/or other disasters or calamities which may happen. In this document, I will describe Singers objective in his work and give his argument with regards to this problem. I will describe 3 counter-arguments to Singer’s view which he tackles, and after that reveal Singer’s reactions to those counter-arguments. I will explain Singer’s idea of marginal

The main purpose of this essay is to examine the current economic development and the future economy of Haiti. Haiti has ranked #1 as the poorest country in the Americas consecutively for the past decade. It has experienced a lot of political violence throughout history. Some events that have left an indelible mark are the colonization and the 2010 earthquake. The Republic of Haiti is located in the Caribbean neighboring the Dominican Republic. Haiti has also encountered rivalry with its neighboring countries such as the Dominican Republic. The official languages spoken in the nation are French and Creole. There are several other languages spoken in different parts of the country. Haiti was first independent nation in Latin America that gained

In Peter Singer’s article, Famine, Affluence, and Morality, he proposes the question: “What are the moral implications of a situation like the one in Bengal (230)?” In order to answer this question Singer presents at least two arguments which involve what one ought to do and the moral consequences of not acting or pursuing our moral obligations. His first and central conclusion is that we “ought” to behave in such a way as to decrease suffering and death as a result of lack of food, shelter and medical care. Assuming that the aforementioned events are “bad” Peter singer argues that we are morally obligated to help “relieve great suffering of the sort that occurs as a result of famine or other disasters” as long as “we can without sacrificing something else of comparable moral importance” (238). In fact, he goes so far as to present an additional conclusion that not acting or pursuing our moral obligation to help is unjustifiable and wrong and we must then change our moral schema about the obligations we have to others.

In Peter Singer’s 1972 article titled “Famine, Affluence and Morality”, he suggests that wealthy nations have an ethical duty to contribute much more than they do to other nations who are suffering through a natural disaster, extreme poverty, famine or other issues. In this paper, I will describe Singers objective and give his argument with regards to this issue. I will describe three counter-arguments to Singer’s view which he addresses, and after that reveal Singer’s reactions to those counterarguments. I will explain Singer’s idea of marginal utility and also differentiate how it pertains to his argument. I will compare how the ideas of duty and charity alter in his suggested world. To conclude, I

A majority of Haiti’s economy relies on foreign aid, with over half of its annual budget coming from outside sources. In 2010 a 7.0 magnitude earthquake hit Haiti which inflicted $7.8 billion in damage which caused the GDP to contract by 5.4%. Foreign aid skyrocketed and about $13.5 billion in donations and pledges flooded in with 75% of them coming from donor nations and the other 25% coming from private charities or organizations. Even 5 years after the earthquake, the situation hasn’t improved. Haitians are still dependent on foreign donations to live. The heavy dependence on donations makes up for Haiti’s low participation in the global economy, which is also negative. Besides the foreign aid, Haiti exports very few products -- with annual exports that are about a third of Jamaica's exports. The United States, a country that has trade

Everyone should have the right to live a stable life with all the necessary essentials, which include food, shelter, and medical care. Unfortunately, not every individual in our world has access to either one or all of these essential life elements. In Peter Singer’s essay, “Famine, Affluence, and Morality”, Singer emphasizes the importance of giving back to those who are less fortunate. Singer in particular claims that those who are affluent individuals should feel morally obligated to donate to humanitarian causes.

Before enrolling in Ethics and Society at Texas State University, I considered myself to be educated about my own decisions and my reasoning for why I think the way I do. Although I assumed I had my morals figured out, I never reflected on the aspect of whether or not it was moral to help one in need. I always understood if someone needed help, it was best to assist in whatever way I could. But after reading John Kekes “On the Supposed Obligation to Relieve Famine,” I now think that it should be reconsidered, depending on the given circumstance, if the person deserves to receive the help. I will explain why John Kekes article changed my perspective on the issue of famine relief throughout the following paper.

In the reading, “Feeding the Hungry” by Jan Narveson the author argues that as a human race we are not morally obligated to help out and feed the poor (514). Furthermore, the author defends in this view by discussing a variety of topics and certain examples to defend his view. These topics talk about how people are not morally obligated to help other people. One, of the main points the author tries to argue is that people that are primarily focused around charity do not pay attention to help their lives (512). Another, example the author talks about how when we go to these third-world countries we are destroying their culture and more than likely or not we are not even to really help them. Lastly, the only time the author feels like were morally

Jan Narveson 's Moral Matters plays an important, if controversial role in the field of applied ethics. Narveson 's unique, contractarian approach analyzes ideas as diverse as suicide, abortion, sexual ethics and affirmative action. Amongst the more contentious aspects of the thoughts expressed in the book is his view of global poverty. Narveson extends foundationalist, anarcho-capitalist approach to this issue; arguing that while charity is morally virtuous, there is no moral obligation on the part of the global rich or developed nation to alleviate the global poor from their precarious position. He also argues that by continuing free trade, enough economic growth will occur to relieve the global poor regardless. *This essay will elaborate on Narveson 's position on global povery and criticize said position in the following aspects; *it 's counter intuitiveness*, *descent into skepticism or relativism* and a failure to account for the interconnectivity found in global financial institutions, *capitalism* and climate change.

The United States seems to have occupied Haiti and taken it upon themselves to almost ‘dictate’ their way of living for what they seem to deem as better for the Haitians. The first order, after having fought off rebels who intended to capture the city for themselves, was to oversee the elections. After said elections the preferred candidate for the U.S., Sudre Dartigurnave, won. He was elected on August the 12th and a little over a month later, on September 15th, a treaty was signed that ensured the U.S.’ domination of Haiti.

Ike left a long trail of death and demolition. It is evaluated that flooding and mudslides executed 74 individuals in Haiti and 2 in the Dominican Republic, aggravating the issues brought on by Fay, Gustav, and Hanna. The Turks and Caicos Islands and the southeastern Bahamas managed to far reach harm to property. Seven passing's were accounted for in Cuba. Ike's tempest surge crushed the Bolivar Peninsula of Texas, and surge winds, and flooding from substantial downpours brought on far-reaching harm in different parts of southeastern Texas, western Louisiana, and Arkansas. Twenty individuals were slaughtered in these territories, with 34 regardless others missing. Property harm from Ike as a tropical storm is assessed at $19.3 billion. Furthermore,

English is the most broadly spoken language worldwide. However, there are many non-English speaking countries in the Americas and the Caribbean. Haiti is one of the non- English speaking Caribbean countries. Their way of life of a group of people developed over time and passed down from generation to generation. The Republic of Haiti is located in the Caribbean Sea, between Cuba and Puerto- Rico. It is a tropical country with an average temperature of 80 degrees Fahrenheit. The capital of Haiti is Port-au-Prince and its official languages are French and Creole. It would be impossible to cover every aspect of Haitian culture in a short cultural paper. We have therefore, chosen to take a values approach to discuss power, prestige, filial responsibility, modernization, status and roles of older adults in that culture.

59 percent of Haitian live in poverty and do not have their basic necessities. The Giver is a novel that was read as a class and also the article "Haiti in Crisis". In The Giver the people live in a utopia and have a perfect and happy life. The people who live in The Giver's community have a complicated free life and do not have to deal with the world problems. In the article "Haiti in Crisis" by Bryan Brown and Patricia Smith it explains how Haiti is a very unfavorable place and they are trying to rebuild from the horrific things that has happened in their past.

The cholera outbreak in Haiti in the late part of 2010 raised a lot of question within the community and abroad. As the country tried to recover from the horrible devastation of the earthquake. Speculation has arose among many human right organizations within Haiti and internationally that the United Nation (UN) have accidental or purposeful dumped waste in the population’s drinking water. In a short period of time, many were infected or have died from the cholera infection. The ethical dilemma comes from the vulnerability of the Haitian population failed infrastructure and the missed steps in protocol by the UN. While the core value of the UN missions, or any other peace keeping mission to say the least, is to “do not harm”, nonetheless harm

Peter Singer said; “If it is in our power to prevent something bad from happening, without thereby sacrificing anything of comparable moral importance, we ought, morally, to do it” (Famine, Affluence, and Morality). As human beings, we have a moral compulsion to help other people, despite the verity that they may be strangers, especially when whatever type of aid we may render can in no approach have a more significant consequence on our own life.