preview

Who Is Guilty In Lord Of The Flies

Decent Essays

Looks are deceiving and may fool us among who is innocent and who is guilty. Lord of the Flies, a novel by William Golding, is a famous novel filled with suspense, action, horror and especially murder. Three boys never made it out alive, Piggy, Simon and a boy with a mulberry birthmark. All three were murdered and all on separate degrees, first degree, second degree, and manslaughter. The evidence adds it all up and states who is guilty of each murder. A boy with a mulberry birthmark was the first victim. When the group was finished lighting there signal fire, so they could be rescued from the island, they accidentally set the forest on fire and the boy was caught in the middle of the fire and was killed and was never mentioned after it. The boys did not have the mental capacity to form the specific intention to commit this murder so this would be considered manslaughter. Nobody in the group noticed, except for Piggy, that the boy was missing from the group after the forest fire. “That little ‘un …show more content…

Simon’s death was on the second degree, it was not planned, but it did happen in the heat of the moment. Jacks new tribe was around the fire and Simon was in the bushes coming to tell them that the beast is just a body of a parachutist, but the boys thought he was the beast and ferociously attacked him with their hands and teeth tearing him apart. Jack tried to make the excuse that the beast took the form of Simon and so that it’s okay that they killed him. This was not a planned murder, but it wasn’t an accident either so that’s why this murder was committed on the second degree. “Kill the beast! Cut his throat! Spill his blood! Do him in!” (pg. 138) is what the boys were saying when killing Simon, they should have realized eventually that it was Simon that they were attacking, but they just kept going and tearing him limb by limb like savages, this is defiantly an act of

Get Access